23-year-old denied heart transplant by U Penn hospital because of autism, mom says
In this July 2012 photo released by Karen Corby shows her son Paul at the Pottsville Free Public Library in Pottsville, Pa. Karen Corby whose autistic adult son was denied a heart transplant is using an online petition to gather support in a bid to convince a hospital to reconsider.
/ AP Photo/Courtesy of Corby FamilyPaul Corby, from Pottsville, Pa., has autism and a mood disorder that causes occasional outbursts. Four years ago, the 23-year-old was also diagnosed with a deadly heart condition called a left ventricular noncompaction that requires a transplant.
The congenital disorder left part of his heart less able to pump blood through his body. After seeking a new heart at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Karen told CBS Philly that Paul was denied the opportunity to be put on the list in part because of his autism.
She said the doctor wrote to her, "I have recommended against transplant given his psychiatric issues, autism, the complexity of the process, multiple procedures and the unknown and unpredictable effect of steroids on behavior."
"I was devastated," Karen told CBS Philly. "I don't see why anyone would think his life is less worthy of saving."
In a statement to the Associated Press, the University of Pennsylvania Health System said it cannot discuss its patients' cases but noted that "when individuals are referred for transplant consideration at Penn or any other certified transplant center, all aspects of their medical status would be reviewed."
"This includes the current health status and post-transplant prognosis of the recipient, the impact of other existing health problems on the success of the surgery itself and over the longer term, as well as the potential interaction between a patient's existing drug therapies and the drugs that would be necessary to stop transplant rejection," the statement from spokeswoman Susan Phillip said. "Our criteria for listing an individual for transplant are regularly reviewed in comparison with national standards, but we always encourage patients to seek another opinion."
Dr. Arthur Caplan, head of the Division of Medical Ethics at New York University's Langone Medical Center who is not involved with this case, told HealthPop that getting onto a transplant program's waiting list is "very much in the hands of the transplant team," which may include a surgeon, social worker, psychologist and specialist, such as cardiologist.
Besides the patient's health, considerations may include the surgeon or doctor's experience, whether the hospital likes to take on risky cases or financial considerations. A transplant can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars - the procedure itself with follow-up monitoring and treatments - so someone without insurance or who is a non-resident living in the U.S. might be excluded by some hospitals for example, Caplan said.
With disabilities in particular, Caplan said he knows of cases in which people with high-functioning or mild intellectual disabilities have gotten transplants, but someone with a more severe case "would be next to impossible" to transplant. That's because of the constant monitoring required because the procedure is so high-risk: whether it's taking the large amounts of medication to prevent the body from rejecting the transplant or seeking treatment at the first sign of infection.
Such care isn't only needed immediately after the transplant, he said. Patients require a lifetime of monitoring, and the anti-rejection medications even may raise cancer risk.
"A heart transplant is substituting a chronic disease for a terminal disease," Caplan said, "It's no picnic."
As such, rather than work with a patient who may lose a heart, the hospital might go with someone who has a better chance of long-term survival given the nationwide organ shortage.
Karen however told CBS Philly that her son takes almost 20 drugs a day as is without any problems, and his medications thus far have not caused any behavior problems.
The case is similar to an incident in Philadelphia where a New Jersey family's 3-year-old daughter Amelia was denied a kidney transplant because of mental disabilities, a decision went viral online.
Karen has began her own online petition on change.org.
"I want to save his life and that's the only way," Karen told CBS Philly.
Caplan says it is ethically hard to argue that a person like Paul, who seems to be enjoying life and has a strong system of family support, should not be considered for a transplant "and it should be hard." He also however added that he does not second-guess the transplant team's decision.
Caplan said if people are outraged by the case, he has one question: Are you a donor?
"If more people would sign their donor cards and licenses, we'd have more hearts," said Caplan. "All these things get rationed and fought over, so as much as somebody might say 'how can they do this,' the question is, "Did you sign your donor card?"
Popular in Health
- Consumer Reports 2013 sunscreen ratings: Which is tops?
- Surgeons remove 4-pound hairball from tiger 10 Photos
- How to get in shape for your wedding
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- Doctor: Gel manicures a potential skin cancer risk
- Heartburn raises throat cancer risk but antacids may help
- Drinking sugary drinks daily linked to kidney stones
- Which sunscreens are recommended for 2013?













"Plus he's on 19 medications, Which the Mother declined to mention to the News people"
In this article it says "Karen (who is this man's mother) however told CBS Philly that her son takes almost 20 drugs a day as is without any problems, and his medications thus far have not caused any behavior problems." You may want to read the article before making untrue comments. I am guessing most of these medication are to help his heart condition. I am also guessing some are for other issues but since I do not know this man or this mother I am just guessing on this.
Just give your son the best last days you can, we all die.
"Just give your son the best last days you can" If it was your child, parents, sibling, partner or anyone you loved would you just give them the best last day or do whatever you could to trying to save their life?
Something not someone
This is a tough decision and it is painful to those who love the individual, but there are good reasons.
"If they wanted to be "nice" they could put her son on the list but that does not guarantee him a heart! " Yes being put on the transplant list does not guarantee him a new heart but it does give him a chance to get a heart. How is it being "nice" by putting this man on the transplant list? Doctors jobs is to make sick people healthy and to keep people alive. Putting him on the list is not them being nice but just them doing their job. This is not about life being unfair it is about people being unfair. These doctors do not having any kind of understanding of people who are autistic and do not having a heart themselves.
She said the doctor wrote to her, "I have recommended against transplant given his psychiatric issues, autism, the complexity of the process, multiple procedures and the unknown and unpredictable effect of steroids on behavior." Everyone is different. Autistic or not steroids can (and most likely will) effects anyone behavior. These doctors say effects of steroids on this mans behavior is unknown and unpredictable. Not that they know it will have a negative effect on this behavior. The only way to know is to try it. All medical advances are made due to trying procedures that the effects are unknown. Transplants were first done with the outcome being unknowns and they only way to know if they could do organ transplants in humans was to try. For anyone having a heart transplant the process is complicated and they will need multiple procedures. It seems like the only reason the doctors give that does not apply to anyone needing a transplants is that he is autistic.
"And before anyone gets snippy about it, my sister in law was very lucky and got a transplant, my cousin did not." did your cousin not get the transplant they needed due to doctors refusing to put them on the transplant list for a issues they were born with and they could not control or change. For your sister in law, what if the doctors refuse to put her on the transplant list and she was no longer with you due to this.
Inmates have received transplants that the states and tax payers pay for. This man who's only crime is that he was born a little different then most people can not have the same chance to get a new heart to save his life as criminals in prisons. This is just wrong and sick.
http://www.wpri.com/dpp/news/local_news/west_bay/cranston-aci-inmate-receives-organ-transplant
http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/submitted/Perry/transplant.html
Autism is more than just about them not forming like other people, it's about everything being not formed right.
I guess this mother rather risk him spending the rest of his life in sleep and dying on the operating table... then she'll go and blame the doctors for HER Ignorance! - Ignorance meaning that she ignored their advice AGAINST it. Not to mention she'll probably go on to try and SUE them.
If she really wants to save her son's life, why not give her heart - if she's a match?
He's on 19 medications, like that's also not going to contribute to something failing? - And I believe the doctors and what they said in this article... Because who;s to say that the condition is NOT going to come BACK?
It has nothing to do with discrimination, it has everything to do with the others who are ON that list who need the heart transplant more than him... Considering they won't redevelop the same condition twice and they'll live longer.
One person said on her petition about Donald Trump and that he got a Transplant and that he's "older than pepper" Well he also was NOT on 19 medications.
Not to mention if he has an mood disorder and has an outburst while recovering that could cause the new transplant to go down hill and kill him.
I agree with them about Steroids... I totally agree with these doctors. Because his body could also reject the transplant... and that being because it's a foreign object... It doesn't have his anti-bodies... The anti-bodies in the transplant attack his anti-bodies and the red blood cells do the same... they fight a war until one of them wins.
Instead of SEEKING another opinion she rather make the university of Pennsylvania look like the BAD GUY!
There are still so many people on those transplant lists who've not gotten their transplants and they aren't autistic.
And I totally agree with this quote - "A heart transplant is substituting a chronic disease for a terminal disease." - meaning that it won't cure it and that it could come back.
There is Organ shortage. They aren't going to risk giving a heart to someone who may only live a few moments or a few months or a few years. Autistic people rarely live long.
I also agree with "Caplan said if people are outraged by the case, he has one question: Are you a donor?" "If more people would sign their donor cards and licenses, we'd have more hearts," said Caplan. "All these things get rationed and fought over, so as much as somebody might say 'how can they do this,' the question is, "Did you sign your donor card?"
A lot of people don't donate their organs... part of it is because of toxins in their body and they can't be put on the list. Besides I thought there was something that was creating heart muscle for heart-patient people?
And even if he gets PUT on the list, What's the guarantee that he's going to get the transplant before he dies? - and even if he does get the transplant what's the risk that he's just going to die a while after? -
A. Autism is a brain-based condition leaving the person unable to multitask very well. So it can be harder to communicate, do complex motor tasks, or sort out sensory inputs. But everything else is formed just fine. Please do tell where you went to medical school (or any school).
B. Paul's heart defect is Paul's heart defect. That is why he needs a new heart. No doctor said it could reoccur. So why would you? That is a crazy leap of logic that you made which is completely wrong.
C. 19 medications are primarily for his heart condition and I would assume, conditions caused by his heart condition.
D. Autistic people live just as long as the rest of us. And they are frequently very intelligent. Maybe one of them could help you with your grammar and spelling if you ask nicely.
E. There are no guarantees, as you say, and that's life. There most certainly no guarantees, for instance, that people like YOU won't spread lies and make completely irrational statements, but there you go, you've proved that point already (many times over).
How do I know? My 10 year old daughter has LVNC.
Oh, and I have no clue what you mean by "as I recall people with autism don't live very long". Please point me to the study or article where you recall reading that.
I support the expression of opinion on any subject but to support that opinion with totally false information deserves a rebuttal. Your prejudice is evident with your conceptual leap of logic that people with autism are not "formed like other people".
I also hope that the doctors doctors making this decision are punished either in this life or the next.
Although already probably a violation of equal protection laws, I pray this will spur legislatures to pass explicit laws protecting the different.
To allow a panel to decide that somebody is not worthy of a chance at life is the first step toward a world we should all fear.
Pardon me if I am somewhat incoherent. For the first time in 20+ years of using the internet, I just want to smash things - monitors, keyboards, etc...
Instead, I'm going to go downstairs and hug my autistic son and pray he never gets hurt or sick enough to risk being judged unworthy.