HealthPop
By

Michelle Castillo /

CBS News/ March 21, 2012, 11:49 AM

Tobacco use claimed 6 million lives in 2011, report shows

cigarette butt, ground, smoking, laws, stock, 4x3 istockphoto

(CBS News) Think a pack of cigarettes only costs you what the store clerk is asking for? Think again. According to the latest edition of the "Tobacco Atlas," the cost of a single pack of cigarettes costs an American smoker $35 when it comes to future health care costs. And, for the almost six million people who died from tobacco use in 2011, cigarettes also cost them their life.

U.S. Appeals court backs FDA's graphic tobacco warning labels
PHOTOS: Shocking ads: Tips from smokers

"We can no longer deny nor accept the massive human and economic harm caused by tobacco," said Dr. John R. Seffrin, chief executive officer for the American Cancer Society, said in a written statement. "This book is a vital tool for not only public health advocates, but also for governments, economists, educators and the media to use to tell the story of how a cohesive, well-funded tobacco industry is systematically causing preventable deaths and crippling economies. We know what needs to be done to counteract these tactics and save up to hundreds of millions of lives."

The American Cancer Society and World Lung Foundation presented the fourth edition of the Tobacco Atlas at the 15th World Conference on Tobacco or Health in Singapore. Since the first atlas was issued in 2002, 50 million people have died from tobacco use and 43 trillion cigarettes have been smoked.

Other findings included that the combined profit of the top six tobacco companies in 2012 was $35.1 billion -- equal to the combined profits of Coca-Cola, Microsoft, and McDonald's that year. In terms of smokers, that means for ever person who died in 2010, the industry profited $6,000.

"If Big Tobacco were a country, it would have a gross domestic product (GDP) of countries like Poland, Saudi Arabia, Sweden and Venezuela," according to the World Lung Foundation.

Eighty percent of deaths from tobacco use occur in low and middle-income countries, the report found. Tobacco use is the number one killer in China and causes 1.2 million deaths annually, which experts expect to go up to 3.5 million deaths by 2030. It's also the leading cause of death for men in Turkey and Kazakhstan. In Egypt, tobacco-related illness accounted for 11 percent of total health care expenditure. Despite high rates of tobacco use and health problems worldwide, 39 percent of countries do not provide cessation support services in their health professional offices.

Click here for more information on the new Tobacco Atlas.

In the United States, the greatest proportion of female deaths - 23 percent - are due to use of the drug. While total cigarette sales averaged about $71 billion between 2000 - 2044, it cost an estimated $193 billion in annual health-related economic losses.

Earlier in March, the U.S. Surgeon General issued a report that more measures like increasing cigarette taxes and creating smoking bans are necessary to stop teens from smoking, according to Healthpop. Even though rates are down, one in five high school-aged teen smokes and the rate of decline is slowing. An estimated 3,800 pick up their first cigarette every day, and 90 percent of current smokers start before the age of 18, according to the press release.

The scariest fact? If trends continue, one billion people will die from tobacco use and exposure during the 21st century, or roughly one person every six seconds. The industry shows no signs of stopping. More than 43 trillion cigarettes have been smoked in the last decade, and cigarette production is increasing to the tune of 16.5 percent.

According to the American Cancer Society, quitting today not only ensures that your sense of smell will return to normal and food will taste better. After five years, the risk of cancer of the mouth, throat, esophagus, and bladder are cut in half compared to a current smoker. Cervical cancer and stroke risk can fall to that of a non-smoker within five years as well.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
20 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
eciguser81 says:
As an ex-smoker of 12 years I try to see this issue from both perspectives! The smokers just want to be left alone and the anti-smokers relentlessly fight for their right to not breath in smoke! Both sides have valid arguments! I personally decided that the risks to my children and I weren't worth it anymore but quitting was nearly impossible! That is until I found a little gadget on www.kickmyash.com that helped me! The electric cigarette could also effectively unite both sides since it allows the smoke to continue what they enjoy (at a much cheaper price) without bothering the surrounding non-smokers with the smell and smoke! It's a shame that big tobacco has such a hold on our government that these amazing products are being unfoundedly attacked by the FDA, who approves the setting afire to and inhalation of 7,000 chemicals but refuses to even entertain the idea of 3 ingredients and a battery! Go figure!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
michael2040 says:
As a smoker I think they should take them off of the market, our dear government is aways willing to tell us what we can use legally or illegally without ammendments. It is a public safty issue. But face it they like the Tax money and fedearl state and local governments are not going to give up the cash.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
harleyrider4freedom says:
Not 1 Death or Sickness Etiologically Assigned to Tobacco. All the diseases attributed to smoking are also present in non smokers. It means, in other words, that they are multifactorial, that is, the result of the interaction of tens, hundreds, sometimes thousands of factors, either known or suspected contributors - of which smoking can be one.
reply
honestabe8 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Are they present in the same rates as with smokers?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
magnumdr says:
You say that Tobacco claimed these lives. There are probably other things in our World that helped these smokers pass away. I am getting sick of the tobacco haters spreading this type of story and ommiting all of the facts so they can blame the deaths directly on tobacco. I ber that this is a big lie just to make all smokers look bad in other peoples eyes. The "least" these people could do is tell the whole story and include the truth about why they died and what caused it, not just blaming it on smoking because they admitted they were somkers!!!!!!!!!!!!! LIARS.
reply
vielmann replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Denial won't save you, buddy. You can act like it's no big deal, but then you'll eat your own words and regret every minute you do. So puff away, addict. We need the living space once you're gone.
harleyrider4freedom replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Here's my all-time favorite "scientific" study of the the anti-smoking campaign: "Lies, Damned Lies, & 400,000 Smoking-Related Deaths," Robert A. Levy and Rosalind B. Marimont, Journal of Regulation, Vol. 21 (4), 1998.

You can access the article for free on the Cato Institute's wesbite, Cato.org. This article neither defends nor promotes smoking. Rather it condemns the abuse of statistics to misinform and scare the public. Levy, by the way taught Statistics for Lawyers at Georgetown University Law School. There is also a popular law school class called How to Lie With Statistics.


You might also find this study of interest. It examines carcinogens in cigarette smoke and finds them insufficient to be a cause of cancer. Last sentence is the key one:

there is little reason to be confident that total removal of the currently measured human lung carcinogens would reduce the incidence of lung cancer among smokers by any noticeable amount.
http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/16/3/584.abstract
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Smokinjoe36 says:
Did you know that the American Cancer Society assumes that
90% of all cancers and 72% of all heart disease is caused by smoking?
And on what sound scientific data have they based this on?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Smokinjoe36 says:
Statistically, this does not make any sense. Smokers have decreased by over 50% since the 60's, and smoking deaths have increased by over 400%. Seems to me that it should be that unexplained deaths due to cancer have increased over 400% since the 1960's.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
aka_mythos says:
I don't smoke... but the way I see it, this is 6 million people who died doing something they enjoyed.

We make smokers pay way more than the product actually costs. We ban the use in public settings. We make them stand in the rain 50ft away form a doorr. We place warnings on their purchase, and we spend millions of dollars telling them its bad for the,m. Maybe they just don't care. Maybe they're just happy doing what they do.

While societies standards may have changed, the same reality is true, that at some point you just have to accept that living is at your own risk.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Tiredashell says:
This is definitely one product for which we have long known there were serious health effects. For some reason, it has not lost its appeal, despite the fact that the risks have been well publicized for decades. It is not very logical.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
feskridge says:
Solution is simple. Tax cigarettes so that they cost 7 or 8 bucks a pack. Problem solved (in the U.S., anyway).
reply
aka_mythos replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
They already cost that much.
honestabe8 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
aka: really? i don't smoke (tobacco), so i had no idea...wow.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
donllawfang says:
If Segs are killing people in the millions why don't the governments make sigs like the laws of selling dope and shut down all growing and selling which will help I belive.
reply
aka_mythos replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Because its an established legal industry and would require something on the level of a constitutional ammendment like prohibition did, to accomplish it.
honestabe8 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
aka: wasn't pot legal before it was prohibited without a constitutional amendment?
See all 20 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right