HealthPop
By

Ryan Jaslow /

CBS News/ February 14, 2012, 3:48 PM

Whitney Houston's autopsy results: What's taking so long?

Singer Whitney Houston performs at the pre-Grammy gala & salute to industry icons with Clive Davis honoring David Geffen in Beverly Hills, Calif., Feb. 13, 2011.

/ AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill
(CBS) What killed Whitney Houston? With unconfirmed reports about the 48-year-old singer's cause of death running rampant, officials have said they will not rule out or confirm a cause of death until they have toxicology results, which can take up to eight weeks to obtain, Reuters reported.

Whitney Houston to be held on Saturday in Newark, N.J.
Complete Coverage: The death of pop diva Whitney Houston

That announcement echoes the cases of Michael Jackson and Amy Winehouse: their toxicology screens took up to two months while speculation grew. These high-profile cases have raised the question, why does it take so long to determine cause of death?

"Toxicology labs are often backlogged," Dr. Lawrence Kobilinsky, professor and chair of the department of sciences at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City, told HealthPop. But as far as doing the actual tests and interpreting results, the process ideally should take no more than a week, he said. Kobilinsky said most people aren't aware that these toxicology labs handle lots of other cases, including drug tests for criminal cases or jobs, and they typically don't fast-track cases just because the subject is famous.

"I suspect the popular media has made toxicology tests almost as magical as everything else," Dr. Andrew Baker, president of the National Association of Medical Examiners, told Reuters. "I am sure there are TV shows where they squirt blood into a machine and five seconds later, they get a print out of every drug the person has ever taken. (But) it just doesn't work like that."

How does an autopsy and toxicology test work?

Kobilinsky, who is not involved in Houston's case, says during an autopsy, the coroner looks for obvious signs of death or signs of cardiac problems to determine if death was from natural causes. But some things might not be able to be seen on an autopsy - such as an arrhythmia, for example - which is why coroners spend so much time reviewing all the information and ruling out other causes, with the help of toxicology screens and other tests. The autopsy itself typically only takes about two to three hours, Kobilinsky said.

Kobilisnky said if a lethal amount of drugs or alcohol caused the deaths, the toxicology results would reflect this quickly from tissue sample and blood tests. But sometimes during a toxicology screening, something totally unexpected may come up, pointing to a new cause of death.

"That's what these tests are all about, finding what you may not expect to find," he said. "I think with six to eight weeks they're covering themselves because it's such a high-profile case. They want to dot the i's and cross the t's in case something comes up strange."

Michael Hensen, chief technical operations officer at Pacific Toxicology Laboratories in Chatsworth, said to the Los Angeles Times, "Once the testing is done there's a review process. That could delay the results as well." He said, "There may even be a delay in getting started as they decide what they're going to test for."

Like most Americans, Kobilinsky has seen the media reports change depending on what channel he's flipped on and said if Houston had a lethal amount of alcohol or drugs in her system, then that would be the cause of death. If levels were not lethal but present enough to cause her to fall unconscious in the bathtub where she was reportedly found, then drowning would be the immediate cause of death, secondary to drugs. If Houston had a heart attack, then that would be the cause of death.

The bottom line? The coroner has to decide once all the evidence comes back - so don't believe everything you're reading.

Kobilinsky said the coroners are in the same boat: "Now they just have to sit and wait."

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
6 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
magnumdr says:
Why can't people just let this Lady rest in peace. I hate this type of coverage that drags on forever. She is dead, let it be.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
puzzler125 says:
It does not take six weeks for the tests from start to finish. The specimens have to get to the laboratory for testing and wait in line just like everyone else's samples.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
julianpenrod says:
When the liars won't reveal the truth to you, you have to be able and willing to find it for yourself. Tragically, many often fail to discern the clues. They're trying to soft peddle the idea of it being expected to take up to six weeks for the reuslts of Whitney Houston's toxicology and autopsy. Apparently, some questionable business is taking place in the background that they don't want to admit. So they whistle up one of their pet "experts", "Dr." Lawrence Kobilinsky. On cue, Kobilinsky parrots that "toxicology labs are backlogged and tests often take that lojng. The message they want taken away is that there's nothing unusual in the tests taking that long. But, then, he adds that "it's such a high profile case" that "they want to dot the i's and cross the t's in case something comes up strange"! Does this mean, then, they taking longer than usual or not? And does it mean they don't dot all the i's and cross all the t's for anyone they don't consider "high profile"?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rwsmith29456 says:
She had an autopsy. Isn't a good idea to wait for a toxicology report in a case like this?? And the reports take some time, not like on the TV where they get instant results.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mcampo84 says:
Um...I believe what's taking so long is a thing called "science." Unfortunately when it comes to scientific certainty, you can't just make a guess and say that you guessed right; you need proof.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SockMonkeySexy says:
What takes so long is something you eluded to in the story !! DUH.

1.) She's dead and by no apparent means that would suggest foul play.

2.) There are many more tests out there to be done. Why should she rank any higher than you or me, or someone's child, or parent ? She shouldn't.

I know...the instant gratification society that we insist upon just doesn't work all of the time. So guess what ?

Take a number and wait your turn.
reply