February 1, 2012 3:11 PM

Sugar should be regulated like alcohol, tobacco, commentary says

By
Ryan Jaslow
Topics
News ,
Food and Drink ,
Disease ,
Research

sugar (Credit: iStockphoto/CBS)

(CBS) Should the government regulate sugar, just like it regulates alcohol and tobacco?

A new commentary published online in the Feb. 1 issue of Nature says sugar is just as "toxic" for people as the other two, so the government should step in to curb its consumption.

The United Nations announced in September that chronic diseases like heart disease, cancer, and diabetes contribute to 35 million deaths worldwide each year, according to the commentary. The U.N. pegged tobacco, alcohol, and diet as big risk factors that contributed to this death rate.

Two of those are regulated by governments, "leaving one of the primary culprits behind this worldwide health crisis unchecked," the authors, Robert H. Lustig, Laura A. Schmidt and Claire D. Brindis, argued.

They said that over the past 50 years, sugar consumption has tripled worldwide. That's also helped contribute to the obesity epidemic - so much so that there are 30 percent more obese people in this world than there are malnourished people.

But how does sugar compare to alcohol?

Sugar meets the same criteria for regulation as alcohol, the authors wrote, because it's unavoidable, there's potential for abuse, it's toxic, and it negatively impacts society. They write that sugar is added to so many processed foods that it's everywhere, and people eat up to 500 calories per day in added sugar alone. Sugar acts on the same areas of the brain as alcohol and tobacco to encourage subsequent intake, they wrote, and it's toxic because research shows that sugar increases disease risk from factors other than added calories, such as when it disrupts metabolism.

"Many people think that obesity is the root cause of these diseases," they wrote. But 40 percent of normal-weight people are developing diseases like diabetes, hypertension, lipid problems, heart and liver disease. "Obesity is not the cause; rather, it is a marker."

That's why it's time that the government steps in and regulates sugar in ways similar to tobacco and alcohol, the authors wrote. That includes taxes, age restrictions and other policies to control the distribution of sugar.

"We are now seeing the toxic downside," co-author and sugar researcher Lustig, a professor of clinical pediatrics at the UCSF Center for Obesity Assessment, Study, and Treatment, told WebMD. "There has to be some sort of societal intervention. We cannot do it on our own because sugar is addictive. Personal intervention is necessary, but not sufficient."

Dr. Marion Nestle, professor of nutrition, food studies, and public health at New York University, told HealthPop that she agrees that it's time for policy changes, since many Americans take in roughly 25 percent of their daily calorie intake through sugar.

"I don't think people have any idea how many calories they take in when they take in soft drinks - particularly because they are consumed in such large quantities," Nestle said. She thinks regulation could eventually be possible, since many local governments are already enacting policies to curb sugar in schools or tax sodas.

"If you have enough of those, the federal government can step in."

Industry groups disagreed with the science and implications of the commentary.

The Sugar Association said it  disputes some of the statistics presented - namely the tripled sugar consumption rates, which it said were based on "incomplete science" in a statement emailed to HealthPop.

"We are confident that the American people are perfectly capable of choosing what foods to eat without stark regulations and unreasonable bans imposed upon them," read a prepared statement from the Sugar Association.

The American Beverage Association added in a separate statement, "Moreover, an isolated focus on a single ingredient such as sugar or fructose to address health issues noted by the World Health Organization to be caused by multiple factors, including tobacco use, harmful alcohol use, an unhealthy diet and lack of physical activity, is an oversimplification"


Add a Comment See all 211 Comments
by sweepmeoffmyfeetnow February 18, 2012 1:45 AM EST
reading As I am having my cup of coffee with a high dose of caffeene, made with tap water that has rocket fule,arcnic and murcery in it. and you say sugar is bad for me.
Reply to this comment
by SHOCKJ2000 February 12, 2012 11:45 PM EST
1 reason and 1 reason only they want to regulate sugar and its for money. Already too many rights and freedom has been taken from us as americans and its only going to get worse the more people vote in liberals All they want is money power and control and we keep giving them more. If they regulate sugar prices of food will go up, companies will loose business and more then likely go under, jobs will be lost across the board and people will be no better off but just the opposite. How about we stop regulating things and let people make choices on their own. Bring freedom back...
Reply to this comment
by shogun63 February 4, 2012 4:08 PM EST
It is the lack of sugar that are making our kids fat!!!! I grew up on chips, cookies and soda as did all of my friends. Not a single one of us were ever fat. Now in our 40's we are all still thin
Reply to this comment
by foodandart February 3, 2012 3:55 PM EST
75% of ALL MEDICAL COST goes to pay for *chronic*, DIET-RELATED disease. Not infectious diseases, not accidents. 75% of YOUR INSURANCE PREMIUM that is rising at what, 10% annually, pays for people that choose to abuse themselves with food.

Now do you insured people that pay handsomely every year think it's fair that sugars - esp. HFCS which IS used as a filler, as a moistener, and as an addicting agent that oops! just ALSO has the capacity to push many into metabolic disease should be cheap and in almost every refined product under the sun?

How much money DO you want to see taken from your paychecks each week to PAY for the medical costs that come of the consumption of this poison?

Come 2014 and Obama's insurance mandate, you're gonna find out.

Have a Coke and a smile.
Reply to this comment
by soupy71 February 3, 2012 8:36 PM EST
how about we educate people and let them decide for themselves
by larissa97 February 4, 2012 7:16 PM EST
Oh boy, here we go. Stop buying into the tobacco and alcohol lobby's inflated statistics. You do know that's what they are, right? Obesity is a problem but don't you find this 'sudden' interest and all these sudden studies into obesity interesting as these two lobbies try to direct interest away from their 'users'? Yeah. Funny how that works.

And no, I'm not obese. Far from it but I'm also not a sheep that's willing to jump on the blame the fat people bandwagon that so many internet bullies seem to enjoy. There's a lot of REALLY bad science floating around and all of you just eat it up because it allows you to pick on an already unpopular segment of society.
by CHL_9mm February 3, 2012 3:54 PM EST
We seriously need for Obama's people to get out of our faces.
Reply to this comment
by karek40 February 3, 2012 2:38 PM EST
Which of us has right to regulate the amount of sugar another eats, alcohol he or she drinks, tobacco they chew or smoke, or times a day they have unprotected sex? This country has gone regulation crazy and that is one of the primary reasons (government regulations) so many industries have left the country.
Reply to this comment
by dawnblewellen February 3, 2012 5:13 PM EST
If my taxes and the country's resources go to pay for motorcyclist without helmets and their lifetime care, children born to parents who have no job, pay for liver transplants for alcoholics and pay for massive amounts of medical care for chronic disease you better believe the government needs to intervene and regulate. Obviously we can't do the right things (ie regulate ourselves) on our own so the government has to step in.
by shogun63 February 4, 2012 4:06 PM EST
Right on!
by larissa97 February 3, 2012 10:37 AM EST
Oh wow are these people ever stupid. First of all, it's not the sugar that's a problem, it's the sheer volume of food that is consumed. Take away sugar and they'll just consume protein and carbs which will still be converted to fat which will still have essentially the same effect.

AND are you going to tax my brain for needing glucose? Because, you know, it does. And are you going to tax fruit because that's fructose which is also a sugar? And what about foods prepped with sugar? There are a LOT.

And what about people who are underweight, like myself, who have to take in more calories than normal including, yes sugar, in order to keep from losing more weight each day? Do we have to pay a penalty for having a different metabolism even though we DON'T have these diseases you claim we have?

I don't btw - have heart disease and diabetes and the host of other 'conditions'. I'm screened every year because of a neurological condition.

This? Such a bad plan. Really.
Reply to this comment
by rhcrest February 3, 2012 5:58 AM EST
Oh my Lord! Now i have heard it all!!!! This gov't is out of it's mind with lust for control and power over its citizens. I cannot believe that this was even a serious news story! It's going to be time for open revolt soon, when we go down to DC and start dragging the politicians out of there buildings and throwing them on the sidewalk where they belong.
Reply to this comment
by valleydentalcare February 2, 2012 7:31 PM EST
I wrote an article " The Sugar rush of the twenty first century"...
and how it is costing billions in dental care for the damage it inflicts...
You can read my full article at yourvalleydental.com and click on Blog section..
Reply to this comment
by larissa97 February 3, 2012 10:45 AM EST
I drank soda for years and yes, it did damage to my teeth but that was the acidity of the soda. Once I stopped? No more damage. My current sugar intake isn't causing me any problems. Then again, I use a water pick daily. Proper oral hygiene will offset any problems with sugar.
by bobkat258 February 2, 2012 3:12 PM EST
Honestly, I think I want to move to another country. And all you brain-washed Bushy flag wavers can keep your comments about America being the best country in the world to yourself. It's just no longer TRUE!
Reply to this comment
See all 211 Comments
.

Follow HealthPop

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
Better Information. Better Health.
CBS News on Facebook