December 19, 2011 11:13 AM

FDA warns man to stop donating sperm over internet

By
Ryan Jaslow
Topics
Health Care ,
News ,
Kids and family ,
Strange

Screenshot

(Credit: http://trentdonor.org/)

(CBS) The FDA has issued a stern warning to Trent Arsenault of Fremont, California: Stop donating your sperm over the internet or you're going to prison.

PICTURES: Sperm: 15 crazy things you should know

The 36-year-old engineer at Hewlett-Packard has been donating his sperm online since 2006, when he answered a personal ad from a local couple trying to have children, the San Francisco Chronicle reported. Since then he's fathered 14 children and has more on the way. Last month alone he impregnated three women through his donated sperm.

"I know the holidays are busy," Arsenault jokingly told the Chronicle. "But I didn't know that included babies."

Arsenault donates his sperm because he believes sperm banks shouldn't charge women or couples seeking families. According to the Chronicle, he also likes that his donation isn't anonymous, which may allow him to one day have a relationship with the children.

Trent donates his sperm after signing contracts with prospective donors who visit his personal website. The site contains a breakdown of his vitals including his height, blood type, diet, and health history, as well as pictures of Arsenault throughout the years.

The FDA has been monitoring Arsenault for more than a year. The agency sent him an "order to cease manufacturing" in Nov. 2010 for distributing 328 donations of semen to 46 different women. The FDA cited that Arsenault's sperm is not tested for communicable diseases in compliance with federal regulations.

Arsenault told The Daily Beast in October that local police delivered the letter which said if he engages in the "recovery, processing, storage, labeling, packaging, or distribution" of sperm, he faces a fine up to $100,000 and a year in prison.

"I saved the FDA letter," Arsenault told The Daily Beast. "It may be worth something someday on eBay."

Arsenault is currently challening the order on the grounds that the FDA can't regulate him giving away sperm to someone he has a personal relationship with. He is allowed to provide his sperm while the case is pending.

But he's not the only who engages in this practice. There's a registry of free private sperm donors that set women up with donors without using sperm banks.

"We do not believe this is a service that recipients or donors should be charged for," reads the Free Sperm Donor Registry's website.

"If it's legal to go to a bar, get drunk, and sleep with a random stranger, then it can't possibly be illegal to provide clean, healthy sperm in a cup," the registry's founder, Beth Gardner, told The Daily Beast. Gardner is the first to admit however that not every donor may be "professional."

Doctor's are against these types of private donations because of safety concerns, but realize they occur.

"I know people will get their friends and just use the turkey baster or whatever. Clearly that happens," Dr. Lynn Westphal, a reproductive endocrinologist at Stanford, told the Chronicle. "But there are reasons for these FDA regulations. It's safer to have the sperm tested."

16 Photos

Sperm: 15 crazy things you should know

View the Full Gallery »


Add a Comment See all 27 Comments
by qmpash December 21, 2011 6:54 AM EST
Live sperm from a live donor who does not charge for this service is not a drug or medical treatment that comes under the aegis of the FDA. God knows, they do a poor enough job with what they are supposed to regulate, but rarely do. The important thing to note is that this individual is giving his sperm away for nothing. Medical services charge high fees and this is what probably is bothering the FDA. If unchecked, this man could kill a cash cow. The FDA might just as well try to regulate prostitution. Good luck with that. Mankind has been trying to do that for 5,000 years without any success.
Reply to this comment
by Not_An_Amateur December 20, 2011 2:26 AM EST
Why would they spend time on this? when 50,000+ are DYING each year from Big Pharma and their con with medicines that produce no cures and MASSIVE profits.
If the research is done..there are high probability drugs right now that will cure CANCER !!

Do your job CBS. Investigate the crime entity known as FDA/Big Pharma.

They've killed more people than The Mafia & street gangs will in a 100 years.
Reply to this comment
by realtimecoffee December 20, 2011 3:15 AM EST
I know right, without big pharma we'd be losing a few extra million a year and the population would have stabilized at about 1900, leaving more room for big factories and slave labor.
by peg0325 December 20, 2011 12:12 AM EST
Has anyone mention the Duggards to the FDA?
Reply to this comment
by nansea5 December 19, 2011 9:21 PM EST
Just dump it!
Reply to this comment
by realtimecoffee December 19, 2011 9:05 PM EST
Time to flip stupid tradition on it's head and honor people who DON'T have children. 7 billion is already twice what Earth can accomodate. We argue about Chevy Volt while breeding ourselves into catastrophy. Time to end taxpayer supported overbreeding.
Reply to this comment
by mecanik-2009 December 19, 2011 8:44 PM EST
Now I'v heard it all. Bit I have to admit this is a creative way to make some money. Unless he's doing this for free and if he is he's probably a nut job that gets into this and has sexual fantasies about impregnating women. At any rate I think he should be allowed to do it if there's women who want it. And I'm sure there are.
Reply to this comment
by puzzler125 December 19, 2011 6:53 PM EST
"Clean, healthy sperm." Okay, prove it!
Reply to this comment
by qmpash December 21, 2011 7:01 AM EST
Open your moth and smile!
by wildinaustin December 19, 2011 5:11 PM EST
The FDA could be busted for being incredible! What safety risks is the FDA referring to? I've looked everywhere for these safety risks and found none. Our government seems to have too much time on it's hands if this is how they spend their days. I wish they would worry about taxes, health ins and our budget instead of trying to legislate common sense!
Reply to this comment
by mjlewis6 December 19, 2011 4:18 PM EST
Give it away for FREE. Most guys would. IF the government were involved in LICENSING sex, you can be sure there would be vagina locks and "seasons' for breeding. As it is, there are statutory rape laws in place to prevent the taking of game "not in season." All about denial and conditioning of the next generation of taxpayers for stability in a community to generate more voters.
Reply to this comment
by credibility2 December 19, 2011 2:30 PM EST
This guy is an idiot and so are the females who have solicited from him. This is the same as prostitution.
Reply to this comment
by gadfly65 December 19, 2011 3:18 PM EST
Your argument lacks credibility.
by jonds56 December 19, 2011 6:59 PM EST
You are mistaken
See all 4 Replies
See all 27 Comments
.

Follow HealthPop

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
Better Information. Better Health.
CBS News on Facebook