Magic mushrooms improve personality? What study says
Wikimedia Commons
(CBS) Will "magic mushrooms" become the next medical marvel?
A groovy new study shows that even a single dose of the shrooms' active ingredient, psilocybin, can enhance people's sense of "openness." That's a term researchers use to mean imaginative, broad-minded, and sensitive to feelings and aesthetics.
The personality change seen in the study has researchers thinking psilocybin could be used to ease depression and anxiety in cancer patients, or maybe help longtime cigarette smokers kick the habit.
"There may be applications for this we can't even imagine at this point," study leader Dr. Roland R. Griffiths, a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, said in a written statement.
The study - published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology - showed that nearly 60 percent of 51 participants given psilocybin exhibited greater openness upon completing two to five eight-hour sessions with the hallucinogen. During each session, participants were encouraged to lie on a couch, listen to music through headphones, and wear an eye mask to block visual stimulation - and to direct their thoughts inward.
Not bad work if you can get it.
The personality change was seen in participants who had undergone what they considered a "mystical experience." Griffiths said such an experience involves "a sense of interconnectedness with all people and things accompanied by a sense of sacredness and reverence."
Maybe that's why the mushrooms - which grow in tropical and subtropical regions of South America, Mexico, and the U.S. - are sometimes called "God's flesh."
But not everyone mellowed out on the mushrooms. Griffiths said some participants reported strong fear or anxiety during their daylong trips, although no one experienced any lasting negative effects.
Most of the study participants said they participated regularly in religious services, prayer, or meditation, according to the statement. Would psilocybin prove beneficial for people who are less "spiritually active?"
"We don't know whether the findings can be generalized to the larger population," Griffith said.
And then there are the cops to consider. According to the website of the U.S. Justice Department's National Drug Intelligence Center, psilocybin is an illegal drug, classified as a Schedule I substance, along with heroin and LSD.
Bummer.
Popular in Health
- "Clouds" singer known for viral hit dies from osteosarcoma
- Mysterious respiratory disease infects 7 in Ala., 2 dead
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- Molecule may be able to block cocaine addiction
- Emergency face transplant successfully performed in Poland
- Miami face-chewing victim still recovering one year later
- Disney pulls show that makes fun of gluten-free child
- Experimental asthma drug helps untreatable patients in study















Meanwhile, back in the forest, Tradition lives on.
rated the experience as having slight spiritual significance and as having slightly increased her sense of well-being or life satisfaction." Are the authors so poorly grounded in concerns relating to ethical treatment of human subjects that they cannot see the problem here? It would be one matter if they were investigating a drug that induced cancer remission, and were encouraging the study participant to continue, but even in that scenario, study investigators must tread very lightly. Her first reaction to the experience should have immediately resulted in her removal from continued study, while still being included in the description of the study results.
Beyond the ethical concerns, the experiments were poorly controlled: 1) The independent raters were aware of the fact that all study participants received a drug 2) Someone who is willing to take hallucinogenic drugs is likely to be more open to chemically-induced spiritual experiences and reporting a long lasting benefit would be a likely bias of these subjects.
I'll quote from another example of the fuzzy thinking of the authors: "Considering the rarity of spontaneous mystical experiences in the general population, the finding that more than 70% of volunteers in the current study had "complete" mystical experiences suggests that most people have the capacity for such experiences under appropriate conditions and, therefore, such experiences are biologically normal." Huh? If a complete mystical experience is rare, how does a chemically-induced mystical experience make it "biologically normal"?
What strikes me as very odd about this work is the fact that the institution where the study took place (Johns Hopkins University) is one where investigators are very unlikely to succeed unless they bring in a lot of clinical money or research dollars. The relevance of this work to the average clinician is quite low, but there are organizations that would be highly interested in knowing if certain drugs can make people "more open" in a long-lasting sense, and I wouldn't be surprised if they are spending quite a bit of money to find out.
Experience the Balance, the Peace.
It's Free.