Nutrition experts blame government for bad eating habits
istockphoto
(CBS) Americans have a reputation for reckless eating - no secret there. We fill our cupboards with fatty, sugary, high-calorie foods while shunning the nutritious fruits and vegetables that government guidelines urge us to eat.
But what underlies our dubious diets? A controversial new study suggests that federal polices deserve some of the blame because they inflate the cost of healthy food.
The guidelines call for us to consume more potassium, dietary fiber, vitamin D, and calcium - and to get fewer calories from saturated fat and added sugar. But meeting those goals inflates our annual grocery bills by hundreds and perhaps thousands of dollars each year, the controversial study showed.
For the study - published in the journal Health Affairs - a team led by University of Washington epidemiologist Dr. Pablo Monsivais used a phone survey and questionnaires to examine the economic impact of meeting the guidelines among consumers in King County, Washington.
The researchers found that the average consumer had to pay an additional $380 each year just to raise daily potassium intake from the current average of 2,800 mg to the recommended 3,500 mg. In addition, they found that it's far cheaper to get calories from fatty, sugary processed food than from fruits and veggies.
A few hundred dollars over the course of a year doesn't sound like much. Do we really pick our foods on the basis of a few dollars here and there?
"People who have less of a budget have less of a choice," Dr. Monsivais told CBS News. "There's a real economic factor" that keeps some people from making healthy food choices.
Other experts agreed.
"It's a common misconception that food choices are solely a matter of personal responsibility," Dr. Marion Nestle, professor of nutrition, food studies, and public health at New York University and an outspoken critic of the fast food industry, told CBS News. "People are hugely influenced by the price of food. If you don't have any money and go into the store to buy some fresh fruits, you might decide that it's cheaper to have a couple of fast food hamburgers."
And those who can afford healthy food may lack the time or the necessary food-preparation skills, Dr. Nestle said.
Government-sponsored cooking classes and kitchen equipment may not be in the offing. But Dr. Monsivais and Dr. Nestle agreed that federal agriculture policies could do more to encourage healthy eating. For example, some of the federal farm subsidies now directed to producers of corn, soybeans, and other crops used to make fast and processed foods could be redirected to growers of fruits and vegetables.
"What's the matter with that?" Dr. Nestle said. "I can't think of a thing."
What do you think? Is the government setting us up to make bad food choices?
Popular in Health
- Feet come first when it comes to body parts with most fungi
- Mysterious respiratory disease infects 7 in Ala., 2 dead
- Airway made by 3D printer saves infant's life
- Almost all states seeing big drop in teen birth rates
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- "Clouds" singer known for viral hit dies from osteosarcoma
- Surgeons remove 4-pound hairball from tiger 10 Photos
- Heartburn raises throat cancer risk but antacids may help
Go to your grocery store and start checking labels. You'd be amazed at how many of the "healty" foods you eat each day are loaded with High Fructose Corn Syrup.
Our government is giving corn-growers subsidies to make that stuff and I have a strong suspicion that we don't even actually know how bad that stuff is for us. Far worse than regular sugar.
It's kind of like the federal government giving fat subsidies to tobacco growers, and then -- from the other side of their face -- getting all up in arms about cigarette manufacturers, finding new "warnings" to put on cigarette packages, and throwing up PSA's about how bad for you smoking is.
If it's bad for you, and creates expensive diseases like cancer or diabetes, why the hell is the US government providing subsidies to grow the damned stuff?
People are responsible for what they eat. Not "the government." And yes, it's a damned sight more difficult for poor people to eat "healthy" than it is for wealthy people. That's true regardless of what country you live in.
But if the US is serious about wanting Americans to eat healthier, they'd do far better to start giving those subsidies to fruit and vegetable growers, and not producers of HFC and cigarettes.
By the way, CBS, awesome product placement with the Wheaties ad alongside this article. Rock on.
@ccdsswrkr08...sounds to me you want a matching button to go with your "look at me badge". Many of us aren't as lucky to have just an 8 hour a day job not to mention brutal drives home. I happen to eat healthy myself, yet completely understand those that eat fast food or unhealthy simply because of time restraints
_____________________________________________________________
Not looking for recognition, I'm looking for people to step up and take responsibility for themselves instead of expecting everyone else to. Brutal drives? I drive an almost 2 hour commute to and from work every day. My husband works 6 days a week, 10 hours a day driving an hour and a half to and from work. YET, we manage to eat healthy. My point is, it is possible to budget your meals and still eat healthy. I have people come into my work who receive over 500 in FS for 3 person families and tell me it's not enough, when both parents arent working and they have all the time in the world to budget their funds. But what do they do, they take the cash they do have and get cable, and cell phones, and play on the internet and buy crap food. It's insane! Sorry people, but you do actually have to try in life.
But then again, like Bill Gates with his massive vaccination program, they are just addressing the over population problem.