Bill Clinton: Billions To Haiti Are "Modest." Really?
Only in Washington, D.C. political circles, it seems, can billions of dollars be dismissed as a "modest amount."
But that's how former president Bill Clinton characterized the U.S. government's foreign aid to Haiti, saying on CBS's Early Show on Friday that relatively little money has been handed to Haiti over the years. (It's about 2:30 into the nearby video.)
The truth is that, according to a government report, U.S. taxpayers handed "about 1.1 billion in assistance" to Haiti during the 1990s. In the following decade, the sum jumped to around $1.6 billion; it would have been higher if aid had not been cut off from 1999 through mid-2004 after the election of Jean-Bertrand Aristide.
That's not counting other aid that U.S. taxpayers send by paying for the lion's share of the United Nations' budget (now over $1 billion a year from the United States). In addition, according to government data, the U.S. sent an extra $367.55 million in 2006 to UN agencies like UNDP, UNICEF, and UNESCO, and the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief was funded at $6 billion in 2008, with much of that earmarked for Haiti as a high-priority "focus country." Less than a year ago, the U.S. Congress approved another $900 million to fight AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria.
Nor is it counting the $100 million that President Obama announced this week will be directed to Haiti, and far more that will likely follow once the U.S. Congress becomes involved.
Clinton may be an unusually able politician, but characterizing billion-dollar sums "modest" really is a bit of a stretch.
The ex-pres, of course, was responding to comments from talk show host Rush Limbaugh, who said this week that: "We've already donated to Haiti. It's called the U.S. income tax."
One way to look at it is to say that Limbaugh was narrowly correct: the fact that U.S. taxpayers have been handing over ever-increasing sums to Haiti and the United Nations -- even as their own incomes have been dropping and unemployment has been rising -- looks a lot like having given at the office.
But more broadly, the sad truth is that after taxpayers in wealthy countries have sent billions of dollars over the years, even before the earthquake Haiti was an economic basket case and nearly ungovernable. The U.K.'s Daily Mail notes that "gangs have continued to wreak havoc and murder throughout a country where new graves are guarded to prevent bodies being stolen for voodoo rituals. The most infamous of these killers is the Cannibal Gang, a group of sadists once led by a former prisoner with political aspirations, who was himself shot in the eyes and had his heart cut out in 2004. His gang lives on, murdering innocent people and allegedly eating their organs."
It's not even clear how much aid actually reaches its intended recipients. It can be misused by international bureaucracies like the United Nations, which spent $23 million on an elaborate ceiling sculpture paid for in part by foreign aid funds. In Haiti, free food from the United States is widely sold illegally in the country's markets instead of being distributed to the hungry (it's ranked as one of the 10 most corrupt nations). And of course the lower prices on subsidized food can drive local farmers, who can no longer make a living, out of business.
So perhaps Clinton was more correct than he knew: foreign aid actually reaching the Haitian people may be only a "modest amount." That's all the more reason to give to private-sector organizations, including local charities in and around Port-au-Prince, that will put the money to better use than international government bureaucracies ever could.
Declan McCullagh is a senior correspondent for CBSNews.com. He can be reached at declan@cbsnews.com and can be followed on Twitter as declanm. You can bookmark Declan's Taking Liberties site here, or subscribe to the RSS feed. Before becoming a CBS employee, Declan was the chief political correspondent for CNET, a reporter for Time, and Washington bureau chief for Wired.
© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved. But that's how former president Bill Clinton characterized the U.S. government's foreign aid to Haiti, saying on CBS's Early Show on Friday that relatively little money has been handed to Haiti over the years. (It's about 2:30 into the nearby video.)
The truth is that, according to a government report, U.S. taxpayers handed "about 1.1 billion in assistance" to Haiti during the 1990s. In the following decade, the sum jumped to around $1.6 billion; it would have been higher if aid had not been cut off from 1999 through mid-2004 after the election of Jean-Bertrand Aristide.
That's not counting other aid that U.S. taxpayers send by paying for the lion's share of the United Nations' budget (now over $1 billion a year from the United States). In addition, according to government data, the U.S. sent an extra $367.55 million in 2006 to UN agencies like UNDP, UNICEF, and UNESCO, and the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief was funded at $6 billion in 2008, with much of that earmarked for Haiti as a high-priority "focus country." Less than a year ago, the U.S. Congress approved another $900 million to fight AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria.
Nor is it counting the $100 million that President Obama announced this week will be directed to Haiti, and far more that will likely follow once the U.S. Congress becomes involved.
Clinton may be an unusually able politician, but characterizing billion-dollar sums "modest" really is a bit of a stretch.
The ex-pres, of course, was responding to comments from talk show host Rush Limbaugh, who said this week that: "We've already donated to Haiti. It's called the U.S. income tax."
One way to look at it is to say that Limbaugh was narrowly correct: the fact that U.S. taxpayers have been handing over ever-increasing sums to Haiti and the United Nations -- even as their own incomes have been dropping and unemployment has been rising -- looks a lot like having given at the office.
But more broadly, the sad truth is that after taxpayers in wealthy countries have sent billions of dollars over the years, even before the earthquake Haiti was an economic basket case and nearly ungovernable. The U.K.'s Daily Mail notes that "gangs have continued to wreak havoc and murder throughout a country where new graves are guarded to prevent bodies being stolen for voodoo rituals. The most infamous of these killers is the Cannibal Gang, a group of sadists once led by a former prisoner with political aspirations, who was himself shot in the eyes and had his heart cut out in 2004. His gang lives on, murdering innocent people and allegedly eating their organs."
It's not even clear how much aid actually reaches its intended recipients. It can be misused by international bureaucracies like the United Nations, which spent $23 million on an elaborate ceiling sculpture paid for in part by foreign aid funds. In Haiti, free food from the United States is widely sold illegally in the country's markets instead of being distributed to the hungry (it's ranked as one of the 10 most corrupt nations). And of course the lower prices on subsidized food can drive local farmers, who can no longer make a living, out of business.
So perhaps Clinton was more correct than he knew: foreign aid actually reaching the Haitian people may be only a "modest amount." That's all the more reason to give to private-sector organizations, including local charities in and around Port-au-Prince, that will put the money to better use than international government bureaucracies ever could.
Declan McCullagh is a senior correspondent for CBSNews.com. He can be reached at declan@cbsnews.com and can be followed on Twitter as declanm. You can bookmark Declan's Taking Liberties site here, or subscribe to the RSS feed. Before becoming a CBS employee, Declan was the chief political correspondent for CNET, a reporter for Time, and Washington bureau chief for Wired.
Popular in Politics
- FBI director acknowledges domestic drone use 145 Comments
- Obama and Berlin: Faded echoes meet new realities
- Obama on NSA programs: Americans "not getting the complete story" 259 Comments
- GOP Sen. Murkowski backs same-sex marriage
- Immigration reform would cut deficit, analysis shows 82 Comments
- House Republicans pass 20-week limit on abortions 576 Comments
- Smooth, on-time Obamacare rollout no sure thing: GAO
- IRS readying to pay $70M in employee bonuses, senator says
However, we can not throw money at problems. Order must be fully restored by foreign intervention if necessary. We could need 10,000 Marines plus about 35,000 Army to do this security issue justice. There must be a government structure to support best practices in fiscal management. Aid packages must be the result of careful, realistic goals and monitored, and evaluated in that light.
Feeding and providing shelter for these people must be done first with tight compliance and incremental goals. Reliable security must be present.
If the current government can not organize effectively soon, then a viceroy must be appointed.
For all that people complain about the US being the world's policeman, it does appear to me that the entire world would be in constant conflict - one that Americans would be afraid to go out into - if we didn't interfere.
Or, at least, so say the Democrats. That's why there's no such thing as an affluent Democrat.
--
1.1 billion over a decade.
dubya spent that entire amount every fortninght in Iraq....
If YOU want to send all your wealth to another nation just so you can feel good about yourself, that's your choice - but you don't have the right to dictate that your neighbor do the same as you.