Sarah Palin: Big Tent Republican?
(Rand Paul)
Rand, like his Texas Congressman father Ron, the junior Paul never bought into Republican claims that toppling Saddam Hussein was vital to American national security interests. Here's the Paul plank. Also, take a look at this seven minute video clip Paul did where he looks into a camera and spells out his concerns about current U.S. foreign policy as well as abuses in the national defense procurement cycle.
In contrast to Palin's rote recitation of justifications for overthrowing Saddam, Paul says he would have voted against a declaration of war against Iraq. During the runup to the U.S. invasion, he says that there "was some question whether intelligence was manipulated."
"The strange thing about Hussein and Iraq is that we actually had been their biggest ally for 20 years because we saw them as a bulwark against the Iranian dominance of the region so I don't think there was a reason to go into Iraq," he said.
Another point of departure from Palin's foreign policy positions: Paul rejects the notion that fighting "them" over there relieves us from fighting terrorists on U.S. soil. He also questions the notion that U.S. policy in the Middle East is killing more terrorists than it creates.
And then this leftist, um, libertarian-Republican questions the bedrock assumption held by many Republicans that it's possible to balance the budget by going after welfare queens is baloney. The reason: The military-industrial complex - which he mentions by name.
"We give billion dollar contracts to Halliburton and they turn around and spend millions on lobbyists to go ask for more money for government so it's an endless cycle of special interest lobbyists then the weapons we decide make - we're being influenced by the makers of weapons on which are the best weapons. That's a crime."
In a statement her PR flak provided to the Washington Post, Palin acknowledged that policy differences exist with Paul. Still, she's bestowing the Sara mark of approval.
"I'm proud to support great grassroots candidates like Dr. Paul. While there are issues we disagree on, he and I are both in agreement that it's time to shake up the status quo in Washington and stand up for common sense ideas."
There you have it, folks. Sarah Palin. Big Tent Republican.
Popular in Politics
- For GOP, scandals could be an electoral plus - or minus 309 Comments
- IRS targeting overlooked biggest soft money groups
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 328 Comments
- Republicans use IRS scandal to tar Obamacare
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington
- Where is the Benghazi cover-up Republicans promised? 405 Comments
- Ousted IRS chief: "I did not mislead" the American people 261 Comments
- Why Obama should worry that current scandals might impact 2016 241 Comments
If so, then perhaps Rand Paul's political beliefs should also be directly compared to ACTUAL Leftists such as Obama and his questionable Cabinet of policy "Czars". Shall we also compare Mr. Rand Paul to Pelosi? Compare him to Reid? You have to be joking.
Mr. Rand Paul is a solid U.S. Constitution-believing American. Hardly what one would truthfully label a Leftist. A hardcore Constitutionalist? YES!! Explaining that R. Rand Paul is A Leftist by today's definitions? No-Way!!!
http://******/aakf9Z
Nor should it be presumed without proof that she even knows what Paul's international policy positions are. Nowhere do I find (in this article or in the announcement of the support by Paul's staff) that Palin ever said why she supports him.
Maybe she likes the word Libertarian.
Nor should it be presumed without proof that she even knows what Paul's international policy positions are. Nowhere do I find (in this article or in the announcement of the support by Paul's staff) that Palin ever said why she supports him.
Maybe she likes the word Libertarian.
She found Kentucky on the map?
Nice work!
Depends on the question, "out of touch with WHAT?"