Coop's Corner
January 29, 2010 11:47 AM

Better GDP, Better Presidential Prospects?

By
Charles Cooper
Topics
In The News
Even his most glittering speech won't do much to rally support for Barack Obama's political agenda. But more reports like Friday's GDP estimate would do wonders to reverse his slide in the polls.

In the fourth quarter of 2009, the U.S. economy grew at its fastest clip - 5.7% - in the last six years. High fives all around? Not quite.

On the surface, this report is great news. But the numbers also reflected a slowdown in inventory liquidations, which dropped $33.5 billion compared with the $139.2 billion decline in the third quarter of 2009. CNBC noted that the change in inventories contributed 3.39 percentage points to GDP, or "the biggest percentage contribution since the fourth quarter of 1987."

Not to be a total party pooper as there is good news in the report: After allowing for the inventory adjustment, the economy still grew a more sturdy 2.2% from 1.5% the previous quarter. But can the nascent recovery continue without more government spending? Even the White House's official spin acknowledges that this inventory bounce, is likely to be transitory.

Paul Krugman, who has warned for months that the economic rebound is likely to fizzle without more fiscal stimulus, argues in his most recent New York Timespiece that "the only thing that's keeping us from sliding into a second Great Depression is deficit spending."

More deficit spending, that is.

"On jobs, it's now clear that the Obama stimulus wasn't nearly big enough. No need now to resolve the question of whether the administration should or could have sought a bigger package early last year. Either way, the point is that the boost from the stimulus will start to fade out in around six months, yet we're still facing years of mass unemployment. The latest projections from the Congressional Budget Office say that the average unemployment rate next year will be only slightly lower than the current, disastrous, 10 percent. Yet there is little sentiment in Congress for any major new job-creation efforts."

He's entirely right about that. Republicans in Congress - as well as many Blue Dog Dems - aren't going to vote for more spending just now, not with the midterm elections on the horizon and the Tea Party crowd feeling its oats. (Maybe that explains the spectacle of Judd Gregg going ballistic on national television Thursday.) But all the political pyrotechnics and posturing in the world won't have as much impact on the White House as the next monthly unemployment report (as well as the ones which follow). If the jobs numbers start going his way, the president will be off to a strong start. Otherwise, 2010 could turn out to be a very long year for the administration.



  • Charles Cooper is an executive editor at CNET News. He has covered technology and business for more than 25 years, working at CBSNews.com, the Associated Press, Computer & Software News, Computer Shopper, PC Week, and ZDNet. E-mail Charlie.

Add a Comment
by bankersvox January 31, 2010 12:41 AM EST
I hope the Pres follows through on NUCLEAR ENERGY and more drilling. That would have very positive effects domestically and for our security.
Reply to this comment
by jgg000101 January 30, 2010 1:04 PM EST
if this figure is revised downward at a later date obama will, and should, lose whatever credibility he has left.
Reply to this comment
by RobAla January 29, 2010 5:39 PM EST
Regarding better prospects for President Obama's approval rating, a President needs the trust of the people in order to gain approval. He has done very little to gain mine; in fact it is quite the opposite.
The President's popularity has decreased due to the following:
Most Americans don't care for lies, corruption, and extremism in a President:
1) He lied 8 times in promises to televise the health care discussions openly on CSPAN.
2) He made deals giving one premium health care plan to union members (supporters) and another to the rest of the country.
3) He stood by and allowed the House and Senate to buy health care votes using taxpayer money.
4) He allowed the health care bills to be fashioned behind closed doors and be filled with political favors.
5) He tried to take over the nations health care by the federal government - most Americans do not want this extreme action.
6) He irresponsibly overspent trillions of dollars the US didn't have on bailouts (President Bush started it and President Obama accelerated it) and bogus stimulus packages.
7) He has behaved in the most partisan manner of any recent President, after promising bipartisanship.
Just to name a few.
This is given rise to anti-democrat and anti-Obama opinion.

His SOTU address didn't help his cause:
Call me skeptical. He lectured the nation on being bipartisan, and then slammed half the people in the room - including the Supreme Court. He lectured the nation about the evils of earmarks, yet this year he signed a bill with 100s of earmarks. He lectured the nation about the evil influence of lobbyist, while having lobbyists in his administration. We have a con man standing in the position of the Presidency. He continually divides the American population. In speaking of repayment of student loans during the address, he offered one deal to those who planned to work for the government and a lesser deal to those who elected to work in the private sector. He fashioned deals in health care, where unions (who politically support him) pay no additional fees on premium health care plans, and forces the fees on the rest of the nation. I find his arrogant and bias words to be sickening.
Reply to this comment
by stormerF2 January 29, 2010 4:50 PM EST
How come we are at the worest GDP since 1946 and the White House is drooling?During the year of 2009 the GDP dropped the lowest ever since 1946 and the Obama Administration is giddy,over a slight increase in the last quarter? Which will be adjusted down just like the 3rd quarter was.
Reply to this comment
.

Follow Coop's Corner

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook