The Trick Was On Us
(GETTY)
First, we learned that Bernard Madoff mocked regulators in a jailhouse interview in which he expressed astonishment that his huge fraud was not unraveled earlier by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The young investigators, Madoff said, should have "checked basics like his account with Wall Street's central clearinghouse and his dealings with the firms that were supposedly handling his trades," the Times reported. "If you're looking at a Ponzi scheme, it's the first thing you do," Madoff said, in what could pass as an epitaph for the costly debacle.
Next, we learned that former Vice President Dick Cheney had a convenient and extraordinarily broad case of amnesia in 2004 when he was questioned under oath in the Valerie Plame CIA leak investigation.
Over and over again, Cheney failed or refused to specifically answer pertinent questions about his role in the leak or its cover-up. If his name were Dick Smith, and he were not a heartbeat from the presidency at the time, the Feds surely would have indicted him based upon this implausible and incomplete testimony. Martha Stewart was convicted for less — and, you could argue, so was I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby (above, with Cheney).
Finally, from a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, we learned more details Friday night about Bush-era interrogation policies and tactics. We learned more about the philosophical and strategic struggles between agents of the Central Intelligence Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. We learned that some well-meaning bureaucrat/officer wrote a memo asking if Saddam Hussein could be interviewed without the benefit of the recitation of a Miranda warning. Permission was granted.
None of these revelations ought to shock us. We've known for a while that Madoff is a crook, that Cheney is proud to flaunt his monarchal bent, and that the CIA and FBI fought like lions and hyenas over the soul of terrorism law following the attacks of September 11, 2001.
Still, when this sort of corroborating evidence emerges into the light of public scrutiny, it becomes harder for those who deny the basic facts to continue to do so. The third or fourth draft of history is usually clearer than the first.
So, the trick this Halloween is the recognition that there are still plenty of liars and con men and rogues running around doing great damage to our legal and political and economic systems.
The treat this Saturday is the knowledge that they usually get busted in the end — and sometimes even before all the damage is really done.
(CBS)
Popular in Politics
- Michelle Obama decries "slander" that educated blacks are "trying to act white" Play Video
- Top Obama officials knew about IRS probe, says WH
- Immigration bill would require fingerprinting at 30 airports
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK 693 Comments
- Republicans continue beating Benghazi drum 479 Comments
- IRS scandal highlights leadership vacancies
- Adviser on White House scandals: "Partisan fishing expeditions" won't distract Obama
- Burma or Myanmar? WH grappling with name game
The treat this Saturday is the knowledge that they usually get busted in the end ? and sometimes even before all the damage is really done. ]
interesting. is this meant to infer that there's a treat to be had somewhere.
i see only tricks.
tremendous damage has been done ... damage that was made possible by a system that both didn't initially prevent it from occuring ... and from this same system that hasn't really changed at all to prevent it from happening again.
there's a myriad of examples ... well beyond what mr. cohen presents ... where what passes for success is getting what one wants ... justifying it as necessary or appropriate ... and in many cases it becoming a standard of acceptance.
our culture has degraded to a state where the moral/ethical 'touchstone' (what you go to to decide should i ... or shouldn't i) for most is now 'can i get away with it'. if you let someone get away with it ... they'll keep doing it. it's only 'standing in the way' of those practicing in this deluded form of justification that stops it. allowing/accepting it condones and reinforces it.
why isn't anyone really standing in the way of this nonsense? these people are supported blindly by those who align with their 'ends' ... and justify the means because they themselves believe they are the ones that gain somehow.
we all lose when this is allowed to continue to occur. why isn't everyone 'standing in the way' ... when are people going to stop only looking out and caring for their own 'ends' to be served?
Please examine the weakness of the key point Cohen attempts to set up. "We learned that some well-meaning bureaucrat/officer wrote a memo asking if Saddam Hussein could be interviewed without the benefit of the recitation of a Miranda warning. Permission was granted." My friends, the Miranda rights are unique to the people of the United States. Absolutely Saddam didn't deserve to be read these rights earned by the forefathers of the United States. Please don't allow Cohen's bold and clear biased ways to affect your ways of reasoning.
these rights are symbolic of who we are supposed to be as a society. whether or not they technically apply to one group or another may be your foundation for your 'reasoned' argument ... but don't allow your own bias to 'justify' actions that serve 'your' own ends ... at the expense of who we're really suppossed to be.
why did you stop there. why didn't the republicans 'roll back' the risky progam? why didn't they ever really bring these things for a vote on the senate floor. the republicans had control of everything. should't they have been able to force thru what they wanted ... they did with everything else that they 'really' wanted.
gwb regularly took credit for and supported affordable mortages as a keystone in the alleged economic successes during his term.
My how we conveniently forget that Hillary and Bill could never remember anything important when under oath. Pardon me but your bias is showing.
His adultery was never the cause of two wars. If he spefically lied to cover up a misdeed it was done to protect himself from his wife not in order to punish a CIA spy, invade a country for profits, and spy on his own citizens.
about what?
pardon me but your petty partisanship is showing.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/williamjclinton
In summary:
During the administration of William Jefferson Clinton, the U.S. enjoyed more peace and economic well being than at any time in its history. He was the first Democratic president since Franklin D. Roosevelt to win a second term. He could point to the lowest unemployment rate in modern times, the lowest inflation in 30 years, the highest home ownership in the country's history, dropping crime rates in many places, and reduced welfare rolls. He proposed the first balanced budget in decades and achieved a budget surplus. As part of a plan to celebrate the millennium in 2000, Clinton called for a great national initiative to end racial discrimination.
This is from a government website it is documented and well get the picture your lies are ending and most are getting tired of them plus the nonsense.