November 25, 2009 5:30 AM

ACLU Helps Pittsburgh Man Get $50,000 After Flipping Off Cops;"Finger" Protected by First Amendment?

By
Ryan Smith
Topics
Daily Blotter
(CBS/AP)
PITTSBURGH (CBS/AP) Getting a $50,000 payment after flipping the bird at a police officer?

That may sound out of hand, but if a tentative settlement approved by the Pittsburgh City Council stands, that is how much David Hackbart stands to gain after filing a free speech lawsuit against the city.

Hackbart says that he was attempting to parallel park in April 2006 when he used his middle finger "to express his frustration" at a driver who pulled behind him and blocked his entry into the space.

Upon hearing a voice instruct him not to "flip off" the driver, he "directed his middle finger at the person speaking," according to the lawsuit. That person turned out to be Sgt. Brian Elledge of the Pittsburgh Police Department.

Elledge ordered Hackbart to stop his vehicle and cited him for violating a state statute prohibiting the use of obscene language and gestures, the lawsuit alleges.

A district justice found Hackbart guilty of violating the statute, but the district attorney withdrew the charge after the ruling was appealed to a higher court.

The American Civil Liberties Union sued saying Hackbart's gesture was constitutionally protected speech and merited a lawsuit.

"Courts have interpreted this section of the statute very narrowly to bar only speech and conduct that is truly obscene and thus outside of First Amendment protection," said Sara Rose, an ACLU attorney.

"The law is clear that using one's middle finger to express discontent or frustration is expressive conduct that is protected by the First Amendment."

Rose said ACLU had been getting a number of complaints from Pittsburgh residents that police have be abusing their authority and "infringing on constitutionally protected speech."

A federal judge postponed a September trial indefinitely at the request of attorneys on both sides.

The city council gave initial approval to the settlement Tuesday, but must vote again next week to approve the payment. The settlement would also include additional police training, Rose said.

The rub?

If the payment goes through, Hackbart will only net $10,000 after $40,000 in attorney's fees.

WHAT DO YOU THINK? Do Americans have a constitutional right to flip off police? Does Hackbart deserve $50,000 for his troubles or has the ACLU gone too far?


Add a Comment
by bikelawyer December 11, 2010 1:07 PM EST
He was arrested for SPEECH. That was wrong. The police screwed up. He was arrested and prosecuted for silently expressing his opinion. $10,000 is a small price. $40,000 for legal fees is not unusual as these cases take time and energy. The attorney fees awards are important b/c lawyers won't take these cases if they won't get paid! In Florida a 14 yr old kid was put into a choke hold by an officer who was upset b/c the boy BLEW HIM A KISS. Yes, an "Air Kiss". "ASSAULT" Charges were filed. The prosecutor took this to trial - and lost. A civil case is now pending.

The police have NO authority to "touch" you, arrest you, prosecute you without probable cause. If they violate that they can be liable for damages. Blowing a kiss is not an "assault" and using your middle finger to express your opinion is not a crime. We can argue over the "value" and damages, but clearly this fellow had the right to recover!
Reply to this comment
by Rohanite November 25, 2009 12:55 PM EST
Liberty and justice for all. I'm sure this is exactly what the founding fathers were going for - the right to express anger through childish actions towards whomever we please!
Reply to this comment
.

Follow Crimesider

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
48 Hours New iPad app A perfect companion to TV's most popular true-crime series.
CBS News on Facebook