December 1, 2011 11:09 AM

Suing Lawrence Taylor "next frontier" in fighting sex trafficking, says expert

By
Julia Dahl
Topics
Daily Blotter

Gloria Allred and Cristine Fierro

(Credit: AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
(CBS) NEW YORK - On Monday afternoon, 18-year-old Cristina Fierro stood before a crowd of reporters at a Manhattan hotel and announced that she was suing former football star Lawrence Taylor.

Fierro, previously known only as "C.F.," is the young woman who, at age 16, was allegedly forced by a man named Rasheed Davis to meet Taylor in a hotel room for sex on May 5, 2010.

Taylor was initially charged with rape, but in January 2011 he pleaded guilty to two misdemeanors instead, and was sentenced to six years probation.

Davis, on the other hand, pleaded guilty to sex trafficking charges and is serving a seven year prison term. According to the U.S. Attorney's sentencing statement, Davis beat Fierro when she said she didn't want to have sex for money, and took the $300 that Mr. Taylor gave her at the end of the act.

"I am glad Mr. Taylor was prosecuted," said Fierro on Monday, reading from a statement. "But I feel as though he should have gone to jail to think about what he has done to me."

Standing beside Fierro was celebrity attorney Gloria Allred, who is representing the young woman.

"Lawrence Taylor pled guilty to patronizing a prostitute and sexual misconduct," she said. "She was not a prostitute, but was instead a child victim of sex trafficking."

Allred announced that Fierro is bringing two lawsuits - one under a local administrative code that allows a victim to sue someone who has committed a "crime of violence motivated by gender," and the other, under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act, which defines any child under 18 who is induced into the sex trade as a victim of sex trafficking.

Allred said she believes this case is "the first civil lawsuit of its kind on behalf of a child victim of sex trafficking against a buyer of a commercial sex act with that child."

Seeking justice in civil court for sexual abuse or trafficking is not new: Just yesterday, one of Jerry Sandusky's alleged victims announced he is suing the former coach; and on Nov. 10, a Miami jury returned a $100 million verdict against Rev. Neil Doherty on behalf of a man he allegedly drugged and raped as a child.

In 2009, a group of Mexican farm workers who had allegedly been trafficked into unpaid labor in Colorado won a $7.8 million in a civil suit against the people who, according to the Denver Post, "brought them to America and forced them to live as virtual prisoners as they worked off their debts."

But experts we spoke to said they believed Allred was correct when she said that Fierro may be the first victim of sex trafficking to ever sue the buyer of the illicit services she provided.

"Men who buy sex from children have this sense they won't be punished, that they'll get away from it," says Bradley Myles, the Executive Director of Polaris Project, a non-profit organization that works to combat human trafficking and modern-day slavery. "These types of cases are starting to send a clear message that you're going to get prosecuted or sued. They are creating a paradigm shift in how we think about children in the sex trade."

And while the suit may be unprecedented, it is, perhaps, the logical next step in a long movement to name, understand and combat what used to be called child or teen prostitution, but is now known in law enforcement circles as "domestic minor sex trafficking." The theory, say advocates and attorneys, is that the so-called pimps who run underage boys and girls for sex on the streets - and between the states - do so through the same kind of violence and intimidation used by people who bring women from foreign countries into the U.S. Thus, they should be called traffickers, and their "prostitutes," trafficking victims.

"The majority of sex trafficking [in the U.S.] happens domestically, between states, not from other countries," says Jeff Dion, Director of the National Crime Victim Bar Association.

According to Kathleen Kim, an attorney and professor at Loyola Law School who has represented victims of trafficking, one reason that there are almost no cases of victims suing their traffickers is that being forced to sell sex is a uniquely traumatic experience that people are reluctant to relive, even in criminal court.

"Most victims would rather just put it behind them," says Kim, who co-authored a booklet entitled "Civil Litigation on Behalf of Victims of Human Trafficking."

Kim says the Fierro case represents a "novel" use of the federal anti-trafficking law - one that has been made possible by changes in 2003 and 2008 which allowed for civil remedies for victims and expanded the pool of defendants who could be sued.

Of course, the facts of Fierro's civil case have yet to be established definitively. According to Allred, Taylor has 30 days to answer the lawsuit.

Lawrence Taylor's attorney Arthur Aidala called the allegations set out in Allred's statement Monday - for example, that Fierro's face was visibly bloody and bruised when she met Taylor in the hotel - "a fairytale."

He told Crimesider that he has a sworn deposition from Fierro's former roommate that contradicts much of what is laid out in Allred's version of events.

"The truth is very ugly for the plaintiff," says Aidala. "We've gone to great lengths not to disparage this girl. Now she has a lawyer exploiting her."

But no matter who wins, the case is, as Bradley Myles of the Polaris Project puts it, "groundbreaking."

"The next frontier in fighting sex trafficking in the U.S. is going to be these civil tools," says Myles.

Brian O'Dwyer, the attorney who helped the family of missing New York City boy Etan Patz sue Jose Ramos for wrongful death - despite the fact that Patz's body was never found, said that the standard of proof is much lower in civil as opposed to criminal court.

"Most of the time it's fairly easy to get a judgment," said O'Dwyer. "The problem is collecting on the judgment."


Add a Comment See all 28 Comments
by quotelawrence December 9, 2011 10:10 PM EST
I can not believe the insanity we are teaching our children and young adults, they get mixed up with pimps, and pimps are known to everyone there is no subversion it is obvious but these young people seem to want something maybe money they go along with everything, to a point and I think every citizen in america should take a minute and go downtown in the evening where pimps, and thugs are wearing their pants so low their junk is hanging out the young girls are running around with everyone acting as if they enjoy the attention and it is obvious that their parents stopped paying attention, because the adults Blacks, Mexicans and taking advantage of these young girls, but you can watch the Police drive by and do nothing, the kids are smoking dope, with the adults, and the adults are hitting on the young girls and it is happening, it is happening as I write, but the cops are turning their heads until someone says something, then it becomes an investigation when it was in plain sight, our society is disfunctional and we just sit back and watch it going down,
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis4 December 9, 2011 1:31 PM EST
Here is a better idea: legalize prostitution, including 'underage' (a human made invention that goes against the fact that we are born with fully functional genitalia from birth) and teach children that NO ONE (not their parents, not their relatives, not 'society') has the right to tell them who they sleep with and who they do not, nor has the right to touch their genitalia or anywhere else on them without their permission.

Easy and simple solution to this 'problem' that is really non-existent and is more about other people looking at children/teenagers having sex and being 'disgusted' by that, much like some people looked at homosexuals and interracials having sex and were 'disgusted' by that.

Keep the ******** 'maturity' issue out of that, that is so damned viewpoint that it is almost totally worthless.
Reply to this comment
by Zann-Zel December 1, 2011 5:28 PM EST
by tomanyt December 1, 2011 3:48 PM EST
@Zabb-Zel....Again, "how was he to know she was underaged ??" And she was paid to perform a service. This makes her a prostitute. Why was she not charged with prostitution?
---------------
First of all - if you're gonna have sex with someone for God's sake, know them well enough to know how OLD they are first!
Second - SHE was NOT paid. The man who FORCED her in there took the money - so no, she's NOT a prostitute.

There is a big difference in Choosing to have sex for money and being FORCED to have sex for money!
Reply to this comment
by cmixxx December 1, 2011 5:11 PM EST
Hope LT enjoys eating his dinners out of a can.
Reply to this comment
by Overruled1 December 1, 2011 5:09 PM EST
I'm afraid this law isn't going to work like they thought.
As I see it, the child victims wont become adults.
Reply to this comment
by Zann-Zel December 1, 2011 5:30 PM EST
Some of them do survive and become adults - obviously!
by Bisk1 December 1, 2011 5:07 PM EST
How many more clients is she SUING ??? Was LT her first and last ??
Reply to this comment
by sallychicago December 1, 2011 7:48 PM EST
Exactly, if she was doing this for a while, there are more men. She's going after the man with the most to lose and money to win....I don't think he has much, besides his pension.
by jade84116 December 1, 2011 4:58 PM EST
Rape maybe, but not sex trafficking as this didn't involve money as far as I know anyway.
Reply to this comment
by Zann-Zel December 1, 2011 5:15 PM EST
It says in the article that the slave trader TOOK the money he paid.
by rational_1 December 1, 2011 4:51 PM EST
Guess I'm going to have to start demanding to see the passport of every bimbo I sleep with from now on just to make sure I never meet Gloria Allred. Ol' Gloria is the poster child for erectile dysfunction.
Reply to this comment
by Zann-Zel December 1, 2011 5:15 PM EST
LMAO...well I guess you gotta blame it on someone - it can't be YOUR fault!
by akibeel December 1, 2011 4:38 PM EST
WHOOP WHOOP Gloria Alred sighting WHOOP WHOOP
BS story ensues...
Reply to this comment
by wlhoppers December 1, 2011 4:42 PM EST
Good one!
by dean-oh December 1, 2011 4:36 PM EST
I'm sorry, but Gloria Allread is the scum here. I swear if some woman didn't like the way some guy looked at her, Allread would want to go after him....and of course, it all about the $$$$$, nothing else. A VERY diss-liked person.
Reply to this comment
by wlhoppers December 1, 2011 4:45 PM EST
Gloria goes after these cases because she can't hack it as a real lawyer.

I met her once - she wears television makeup constantly in case a camera shows up at any given moment. Looks like you could peel it off with a putty knife.
See all 28 Comments
.

Follow Crimesider

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
48 Hours New iPad app A perfect companion to TV's most popular true-crime series.
CBS News on Facebook