New York Terror Trial: Giuliani Says Obama Too "Concerned with Rights of Terrorists"

By: Ryan Smith
Topics: Daily Blotter

(CBS)

NEW YORK Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani saw firsthand the destruction that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is accused of masterminding September 11, 2001 as jetliners smashed into the Twin Towers.

Eight years later, the former Republican candidate for president in not mincing words with the Obama administration, saying Sunday that in bringing those accused of the Sept. 11 attacks to New York for trial, the President has become too concerned with the "rights of terrorists" and is oblivious to, what Giuliani feels, are the real dangers of radical Islam.

"What the Obama administration is telling us loud and clear is that both in substance and reality the war on terror from their point of view is over," Giuliani said. Moving the case to a civilian court, he said, "seems to be an over concern with the rights of terrorists and a lack of concern for the rights of the public."

The former mayor was similarly critical of the administration's handling of the shooting spree at Fort Hood last week. President Barack Obama, he said, "doesn't get the fact that there is an Islamic war against us."

Giuliani's view that the Obama administration is erring in trying Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four others near the site of the World Trade Center was echoed by other Republicans on the Sunday news programs.

This comes as current New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg seems to be at odds with his predecessor, saying that "it is fitting that 9/11 suspects face justice near the World Trade Center site where so many New Yorkers were murdered."

And New York Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly said holding the trial in the city most devastated by the 2001 attack is appropriate, and he pronounced the Police Department prepared to meet any security challenge.

(AP Photo/www.muslm.net)

Photo: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

Meanwhile, Democrats defended the decision of Attorney General Eric Holder to try the five in New York where more than 2,000 civilians were killed on Sept. 11.

"If somebody murders Americans and they murder Americans in America, they ought to be prosecuted in America, and hopefully convicted in America," Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee told Bob Schieffer on CBS' Face the Nation Sunday.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, a former senator from New York, said she had no problem with Holder's decision to try Mohammed and the others in the state.

"My goal is to make sure that the mastermind and the other implementers and designers of this horrific attack on us pay the ultimate penalty for what they did to the United States and to a lot of people whom I know and who I had the honor of representing," she said, adding, "I'm not going to second guess the attorney general."

Republicans argued that the five are war criminals and should be tried in the military tribunals where other Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, detainees will be judged. They disputed administration arguments that these five were conspirators to a crime committed on American soil.

Rep. Pete Hoekstra of Michigan, top Republican on the House intelligence committee, said the trial could expose the people of New York to years of propaganda from the defendants.

(AP)

Photo: Twin Towers in New York City attacked Sept. 11, 2001.

"We are now going to rip that wound wide open and it's going to stay open two, three, four years," he said. "They are going to do everything they can to disrupt it and make it a circus" for their radical ideology, he said.

But White House adviser David Axelrod countered, "We believe that these folks should be tried in New York City ... near where their heinous acts were conducted in full view, in our court system, which we believe in."

Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., said there was no better group of people to determine the guilt or innocence and the punishment for these men "than the people in New York who saw the towers fall."

Reed added that Mohammed and the others wanted to be considered as holy warriors, and "if we try them before military officers, that image of a soldier will be portrayed by the Islamic community. That's not the image we want."

Republicans also took issue with a statement from a White House official that the administration may buy a near-empty prison in northwestern Illinois to incarcerate suspected terrorists now housed at Guantanamo. "Why move them into the United States while we are still under the threat from radical jihadists?" Hoekstra asked.

(REUTERS)

Photo: Flags at half-mast in Liberty State Park, across the Hudson River from Ground Zero.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said moving prisoners to Illinois could be a "huge issue" in that state, particularly in the Senate race in the state next year.

Giuliani appeared on "Fox News Sunday," ABC's "This Week" and CNN's "State of the Union." Reed and McConnell were also on Fox. Clinton spoke on ABC and NBC's "Meet the Press." Hoekstra and Leahy appeared on CBS' "Face the Nation." Axelrod appeared on CNN.

WHAT DO YOU THINK? Should suspected terrorists be tried in New York City civilian courts, military tribunals or held in detention indefinitely?

PREVIOUSLY ON CRIMESIDER
November 13, 2009 - Khalid Sheikh Mohammed: Can New York Handle Self-Proclaimed Sept. 11 Mastermind?

14 Comments Have Your Say
Email Story Send to a Friend
Share This Tell Your Friends
Tweet This Tweet This
More Share It

Add a Comment

See all 14 Comments


by snesich November 18, 2009 4:31 AM EST: Rudolph Giuliani is either a coward and incredibly naive about how the judicial system works, or he's just exploiting this "issue" for what he perceives as political gain.

So, which is it, Rudy? Do you really, truly believe this drivel you're spewing or is it just something you're trying to exploit to enhance your own power and glory?

Either way, you've only reinforced my belief that you're no longer a person to be trusted. Bye bye, Rudy.; Reply to this comment


by thesevenveils November 17, 2009 12:29 PM EST: Typical of "Screw the Constitution" Giuliani. He'd be a perfect mafia boss.; Reply to this comment


by skepticalJM November 17, 2009 11:45 AM EST: Justice only for some?; Reply to this comment


by koko98-2009 November 17, 2009 11:29 AM EST: Mr. Guilani did not have any problems when the first World Trade Center attackers were tried in the '90's. He is just doing what he does best sewing the seeds of fear. What a tool.; Reply to this comment


by briannorwood November 17, 2009 10:16 AM EST: Thank God that Guilliani did not become President. I for one am sick and tired of this jackass.

If he had as much pride and faith in our democracy and the American judicial system as I do, he would understand the symbolic importance a conviction of this murderer would be for the entire world.

Guilianni is nothing more than a grand-standing blowhard!; Reply to this comment


by bruce691 November 17, 2009 8:13 AM EST: Its hard to believe that Guiliani was a prosecutor. Justice is for "We the people". It has nothing to do with whether a person deserves a trial. It has everything to do with the laws of the USA. If an individual breaks OUR laws he/she will be brought to justice. I hope he is convicted and executed. I'd love to watch his execution. But, we as Americans, deserve this trial to show the world what we are about. Isn't this what we have been fighting and dieing for? For over 200 years!!; Reply to this comment


by SusanStoHelit November 16, 2009 8:36 PM EST: They are criminals and mass murderers and should be tried as such. And personally - they have not made me too scared to maintain American values. We believe in justice. And if they did it - and we know they did - we've got the evidence.; Reply to this comment


by mikelpond November 16, 2009 8:15 PM EST: these cowards are always ready to go to war because they're kids won't be going. But as soon as we start talking about the prisoners from the war they were in favor of, suddenly it's too dangerous? This is stupid and cowardly. If he is soo afraid why didn't he say so going in? I think we know why!
mike; Reply to this comment