Dad Who Chose Prayer Over Doctors 'Shocked' by Daughters Death

By: Ryan Smith
Topics: Daily Blotter

(iStockphoto)

OREGON CITY, Ore. (CBS/AP) Carl and Raylene Worthington, parents of a 15-month old daughter, Ava, put their faith in spiritual healing, when their child got sick. Now the couple is on trial for manslaughter and criminal mistreatment for the infant's death.

Carl Brent Worthington testified Friday that in the hours before his daughter died of pneumonia, he didn't lose his faith, which he called a gift from God.

But Worthington wouldn't say whether he would have done anything differently or taken the 15-month-old to a doctor last year.

"That's an impossible question to answer because I wasn't faced with that," he told prosecutor Greg Horner. "It's possible someone could lose their faith and take their child in."

"If I don't have the faith, that's where I would have been, taking her in," he said.

(AP Photo/Randy L. Rasmussen)

Carl and Raylene Worthington hold hands during opening statements on Monday, June 29, 2009

If convicted on the manslaughter charges, the couple faces up to 10 years in prison. It is the first such case brought under a 1999 Oregon law that bars a religious defense in most abuse cases.

The Worthingtons have argued that Ava appeared to be a healthy child suffering from a seasonal cold and never seemed in jeopardy until she died of a fast-moving infection on the night of March 2.

Worthington sobbed as he described how he and others were convinced Ava was better, so they were in the kitchen breaking a fast undertaken as part of the faith-healing. But from down the hall came a cry, he said, and he went to the bedroom to find Ava dead.

"I was shocked," he said.

Prosecutor Horner suggested that family and friends undertook exceptional efforts in Ava's last hours that they now are downplaying. The prosecution contends the girl died of a long-standing condition, a mass on her neck that grew so large it impeded her breathing and damaged her respiratory system, allowing pneumonia and infection to take hold.

Worthington said that the family and church members who gathered at the home drew on all of their faith-healing practices: annointing the girl with oil, giving her a dab of wine with water, calling church members for prayers, fasting and praying over the girl three times in the 24 hours.

(AP Photo/Rick Bowmer)

Carl and Raylene Worthington

The Worthingtons are members of the small Oregon City church, which advocates spiritual healing instead of medical care. It was the focus of an investigation a decade ago after a series of child deaths, resulting in the change to state law limiting exemptions from prosecution in faith healing deaths.

Horner questioned Worthington about what he told police after the death, saying the interviews painted a more serious picture of the girl's condition than did his trial testimony.

Despite testimony from doctors that the girl could have been saved with medical attention shortly before her death, Worthington said he had heard nothing at the trial that proved she would have been helped.

When asked why he didn't know about his daughter's pneumonia and infection, Worthington replied: "Because I'm not a doctor, I guess."

At an earlier hearing, the judge said the key in the Worthington case was the failure to provide medical care when there is a "compelling state interest" in protecting the health of children.

Worthington also testified Friday that at the insistence of Oregon child welfare officials, his surviving older daughter did get a medical exam after Ava's death.

It showed the elder daughter healthy, he said, and the exam was done because state officials, who could take custody of the child, left the parents little choice.

1 Comment Have Your Say
Email Story Send to a Friend
Share This Tell Your Friends
Tweet This Tweet This
More Share It

Add a Comment


by brianbwb-2009 July 13, 2009 10:37 PM EDT: The main problem here is one of belief. While it is apparently the nature of some to believe in a deity that, in this extremely large and complex universe, is even remotely concerned with some of the least significant parts of it, believers forget that their belief is just that, a belief.

When they force their beliefs upon others, in this case a child whose life and welfare is entrusted to the adult "believers", they then are responsible for that child's life, so since they refused actions that would likely have saved the child (at least with a far greater probability than their belief) they are then guilty of neglect resulting in the death of that child, and trying to avoid that responsibility by blaming it on their deity is not only blasphemous, but also is the worst form of cowardice.

If they truly believed that their deity would heal the child, then plead guilty, or no contest to the charge, stand up for their belief, and let their deity watch over them while they receive the legal sanction for their misdeed.; Reply to this comment