Clash Brewing over $100M Citi Bonus

(CBS)
Hall's potential nine-figure payday is stipulated in his contract with Citigroup, which owes a lot to his management of the lucrative Phibro energy trading unit. But, of course, Citigroup is on the hook for $45 billion in government aid and White House executive pay czar Kenneth Feinberg is looking for ways to rein in banks' super-sized bonuses.
As the Deal's George White points out, the situation presents a bit of a conundrum for Citigroup– satisfying the government's demands for fiscal sanity in executive pay structure would also mean perhaps losing its top money-earners, making its return to profitability all the more difficult.
It would also require nullifying an existing contract simply on the basis of its unpopularity, a prospect fraught with legal complications.
On the contract issue, White lays out the two schools of thought:
Roger Ehrenberg argues that "if contracts entered into legally and without prejudice are all of a sudden cast into doubt, the entire foundation of free and fair commerce is in jeopardy."
But Reuters' Felix Salmon counters that "Hall's contract would be worth bupkis if Citi had gone bankrupt; the only reason it didn't was that the US government bailed it out. So if the US government wants to call some shots here, it can."
Citigroup's position is particularly hazardous because they, unlike some other financial giants like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan, didn't post 2nd-quarter profits, meaning they're still tethered to the government to a greater degree.
Other banks may also take their cue on bonuses from whatever happens to Citi, so there promises to be many gazes fixed on it when decision time comes.
Popular on MoneyWatch
- Amy's Baking Company: Post-meltdown PR campaign
- How to stop the mediocrity pandemic
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- 4 Things Not to Buy at Costco
- Top 10 professional life coaching myths
- 5 Things You Should Buy at Costco
- 12 great college graduation gift ideas
- Powerball: What to do if you won














A) I wonder how much money ONE person needs. Mr Hall can never spend 100 mill plus his annually salary - which is most likely also in millions. How many people could survive for the next two to three years - until the recession is over - on 100 million ? 1111 families for three years (30k annually).
B) I completely agree with Reuters' Felix Salmon that: "Hall's contract would be worth bupkis if Citi had gone bankrupt; the only reason it didn't was that the US government bailed it out. So if the US government wants to call some shots here, it can."
C)If we let Citi / Mr Hall get away with his 100 million bonus, we have to pay all the CEO?s (including GM, Ford,...) their bonuses and at that point we would have been better off, flushing all the bail-out-money down the toilet.
So for me NO Bonus until Citigroup is in the black?s and has payed off his debs to US.
Isn't it time the system went in for some much needed repair?
Due diligence and oversight long ago slid out the window. No one was watching.
A dramatic change swept through all of North America's boardrooms over the past 30 years. It is one of the underlying causes of the headache the economy is now feeling, but more importantly, it has resulted in the general feeling of "disconnect" by most Americans from the billions in bonuses being paid to too many on Wall Street who produce absolutely Nothing.
"We the shareholder of your companies, ?.
http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/03/letter-to-ceos-of-fortune-1000-cos.html
And now we bow before the Almighty Dollar and His son the Stock Market.
AMoney
Corporate Prayer
This is just all been a lie....
The corporation needs our help, but the people behind it all have masterminded our nation's economic disaster, while profiting from it.