Dow
     +0.00
12883.95
+0.00
|
     +0.00
1349.96
+0.00
|
     +0.00
14091.63
+0.00
|
     +0.00
2915.86
+0.00
|
     +0.00
54.16
+0.00
|
     +0.50
115.18
+0.44%
|
     +0.02
1.99
+0.82%
Econwatch
May 14, 2009 3:49 AM

Obama Aides Take Axe To Chrysler's Budget

By
Declan McCullagh
Topics
Bailouts
4973210

The Obama administration appears to have reminded Chrysler about the cost of accepting government bailouts: with federal funds comes federal control.

A report this week in Advertising Age said that Chrysler wanted to spend $134 million in advertising over the nine-week duration of its bankruptcy. But Mr. Obama's auto-industry task force sliced that figure in half.

Robert Manzo, executive director of Capstone Advisory Group and a Chrysler consultant, testified at a May 4 hearing in bankruptcy court that the task force "believed that it was not feasible to not spend anything on marketing and advertising for fear of eroding the image of the brand." But, Ad Age said, the task force overruled the car maker. (Chrysler's factories will be shuttered for those nine weeks.)

Mr. Obama's Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry includes Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and officials from the Commerce, Transportation, Labor, and Energy departments, plus representatives of the EPA, White House, the Economic Recovery Advisory Board, and the National Economic Council. It includes no professional marketers.

Expect bailout-recipient General Motors to be paying close attention.

This is part of a series of moves by Mr. Obama and his aides -- specificially, to exert more control over American businesses -- that has alarmed free-market and conservative thinkers.

One example is the attempt to find ways to regulate pay in the financial services industry -- even at companies that accepted no federal bailout cash. Then there's Mr. Obama's pressure on the health care industry to cut costs (which may be difficult to measure), and the administration's unusual legal assault on Chrysler creditors.

Mr. Obama and his aides soon may have more opportunities to demonstrate how far they're willing to go. As the New York Times reported on Tuesday, men's suit maker Hartmarx is in bankruptcy, and its workers are pressuring creditor Wells Fargo to keep the company intact -- a choice that might not bring in as much money.

Their leverage? Wells Fargo received $25 billion in tax dollars as part of a bailout. So Hartmax employees, as the Times notes, see an opening: "The workers and their union are arguing that Wells Fargo, having received $25 billion in the bank bailout, should keep a 122-year-old American company like Hartmarx in business and preserve some 3,600 jobs."


  • Declan McCullagh is the chief political correspondent for CNET. Declan previously was a reporter for Time and the Washington bureau chief for Wired and wrote the Taking Liberties section and Other People's Money column for CBS News' Web site.

Add a Comment See all 63 Comments
by lami987 May 18, 2009 1:01 AM EDT
All Chrysler's commercials I saw were for gas guzzlers. It seems Chrysler just plainly don't have any smaller vehicle on their product lines. With those kinds of vehicles on hand any amount of advertising of any kind could not help. Look like Chrysler is toast until Fiat's smaller cars are introduced here.
Reply to this comment
by dfnj2009 May 15, 2009 7:09 PM EDT
Don't worry, as soon as the Chinese Yuan is allowed to float against the dollar all our CEO jobs will be outsourced!!!

Time to bring the military home before the big riots start. No jobs, no peace. No jobs, no peace. No jobs, no peace. No jobs, no peace. No jobs, no peace. No jobs, no peace. No jobs, no peace.
Reply to this comment
by roach9703 May 15, 2009 11:46 AM EDT
Hey Folks we have with Chrysler Nannynomics? No, Sonny you can't spend that.
Reply to this comment
by nojoy01 May 15, 2009 8:39 AM EDT
This shows how gullible Libs are. Anyone with an ounce of common sense would realize that nobody would "drive erratically" with all that stuff in the truck! It was a fabrication designed to cast Obama as a "victim". As everyone knows, there is nothing Libs love more than a "VICTIM"!!! LMAO
Posted by allylic at 4:08 PM : May 14, 2009

Actually, "drive erratically" is copspeak for "he looked hinky" & is a probable cause reason after the fact.
Reply to this comment
by mountaingirllll May 14, 2009 5:21 PM EDT
well im not buying a chrysler unless its on sale anyway and if i dont have enough money theyll give me a payment plan.....federal control? right on man,..........ill get some credit now
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 May 14, 2009 11:31 AM EDT
"...AHAHAh just a hollow stuffed shirt." Posted by louiville2

Still irrelevant.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 May 14, 2009 11:28 AM EDT
"... The man of Somali descent may ...cbs4denver.com/local/burnsley.hotel.death.2.794241.html - 66k" Posted by louiville2

Still stuck in irrelevant city, it seems.

The bottom line is that in reality, our oil, gas, even our metals are taken from public land, in essence we give corporations the materials they use to manufacture their product, so we really should have asserted control earlier, but at least if we now give our money, then by capitalist conventions, we do own the shares, and as such have the right for our representatives to determine the companies' direction.

Like I said, don't like it? then don't take the money.
Reply to this comment
by louiville2 May 14, 2009 11:26 AM EDT
Elected, annointed, same thing. Funny how it is the neos who are the only ones using such outdated terms.
Posted by brianbwb-2009 at 8:15 AM

AHAHAh just a hollow stuffed shirt.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 May 14, 2009 11:23 AM EDT
"One example is the attempt to find ways to regulate pay in the financial services industry -- even at companies that accepted no federal bailout cash. Then there's Mr. Obama's pressure on the health care industry to cut costs (which may be difficult to measure), and the administration's unusual legal assault on Chrysler creditors. "

McCullagh seems to believe that these measures are not necessary to create workable, profitable companies. Simple math, Mac, if you don't pay megabucks to CEOs, that is that much more money available as dividend, or that much less operating cost. I wonder what part of that he thinks is not good?

As far as the health industry, they either cut costs, or the government, whose role it is to protect its citizens, would be moved to create a public health care system, against which these gouging companies must then compete.

If we do so on a profit-neutral basis, neither making, or losing money, the private concerns won't be able to compete, Mr Obama is trying a last ditch appeal to the greedy, before having to resort to such measures.

I say enough cajoling, lets set up the public system, if they han't hang, then tough titz.
Reply to this comment
by louiville2 May 14, 2009 11:17 AM EDT
Like I said originally, you neos should think before posting BS, because it can easily be checked.
Posted by brianbwb-2009 at 8:07 AM

What an Idiot, see:

The 29-year-old was a Canadian citizen from Ottawa who arrived there as a Somali refugee in the 1990s, The Ottawa Sun reported Wednesday.

Dirie left town three weeks ago in a rental car to drive relatives to Toronto. A week or so ago, he told family members he was going on to Denver for a vacation, the paper reported. http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_10194730

Or

Authorities say they found about a pound of sodium cyanide in a Denver hotel room where the body of a Canadian man was discovered. The man of Somali descent may ...cbs4denver.com/local/burnsley.hotel.death.2.794241.html - 66k
Reply to this comment
See all 63 Comments
.

Follow Econwatch

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook