Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     -108.90
14000.51
-0.77%
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
Econwatch
March 17, 2009 3:15 PM

Report Says 163 Banks Could Be At Risk

By
Declan McCullagh
Topics
Housing Crisis
4847845Caption: FDIC head Sheila Bair says no taxpayer dollars are at risk in bank failures

Bad loans are causing more and more serious problems for U.S. banks, according to a new analysis of Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. data that points to another wave of bank failures.

U.S. banks registered a 149 percent increase in troubled assets from December 2007 to December 2008, and 163 banks ended last year with more troubled loans than capital, according to an analysis by MSNBC.com and the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University in Washington, D.C. That's up from only 13 banks that found themselves in such an upside-down position a year earlier.

Wendell Cochran, an associate professor at American University, set up a Web site with more details called banktracker.investigativereportingworkshop.org. Cochran wrote that although most banks remain reasonably strong, "it is clear that a year-long, and deepening, recession has taken its toll on many banks, especially those that are deeply involved in real estate lending."

The information is detailed enough to let customers look up the troubled asset ratio for their own bank and decide whether or not to shift their money elsewhere. The FDIC currently insures deposit accounts up to $250,000 -- but an individual or business holding more than that in a single account could lose money in a bank failure.

Some examples: BankUnited in Coral Gables, Fla., an epicenter of the housing crash, boasts a remarkable ratio of 251.6, which means the bank has 2.5 times as many troubled assets as capital. Vineyard Bank in the housing-depressed area of Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. has a similar ratio of 213.1.

Meanwhile, banks in areas like Missouri (Scottrade Bank, ratio of 0) and Utah (CIT Bank, ratio of 1.1) that never experienced a wildly inflated housing bubble are in fine shape. (The journalists devised the ratio by summing loans past due 90 days or more, foreclosed properties owned by the bank, and so on, and divided the total troubled assets by the bank's capital and loan loss reserves.)

These data sketch a picture of banks that are struggling under a growing weight of bad loans, bad mortgages, and -- perhaps soon -- an increasing number of bad credit card loans and bad auto loans as well.

FDIC head Sheila Bair told CBS News recently that: "We are funded by insurance premiums that are assessed on banks. So, no it's not taxpayer money." On the other hand, Sen. Christopher Dodd, the Democratic chairman of the Banking Committee, has proposed allowing the FDIC to borrow as much as $500 billion in taxpayer money from the U.S. Treasury.

Perhaps those dollars would eventually be paid back. But with a popped real estate bubble that shows no sign of re-inflating anytime soon, and more bad loans on the horizon, another wave of bank failures would make that much less likely

  • Declan McCullagh is the chief political correspondent for CNET. Declan previously was a reporter for Time and the Washington bureau chief for Wired and wrote the Taking Liberties section and Other People's Money column for CBS News' Web site.

Add a Comment
by wilbursandersjr March 18, 2009 12:23 PM EDT
The FDIC is as poorly underfunded as The FSLIC was in 1989. We better hope that the big banks stay afloat or we will have to bail out the FDIC ala the Big Three in Detroit.
Reply to this comment
by perk235 March 17, 2009 9:07 PM EDT
DEREGULATION by the Gram/Leach/Bliley Act and the Commodities Modernization Act created these problems.

The five top holders of derivatives are JP Morgan, Citibank, Bank of America, HSBC Bank USA, and Wells Fargo. They reported almost $600 billion in losses from derivatives by December 31, 2008.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti March 17, 2009 5:55 PM EDT
This disaster is the direct result of Reaganomics and the crazy right wing wackos who think that corporations are good citizens. Well, we can see how well they did for America.

This is the second great Republican depression in the last 100 years, when are we going to learn? Almost everything the right wingers say is exactly the opposite. They say they care about America, they say they are for the common folks. They say they want peace and freedom. They say they are for rights and freedom of choice. It is all ONE BIG SLIMY REPUBLICAN LIE.
Reply to this comment
.

Follow Econwatch

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook