Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     -108.90
14000.51
-0.77%
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
Econwatch
February 27, 2009 12:04 PM

Ex-Bush Economist: Blame The Federal Reserve For The Crash

By
Declan McCullagh
Topics
Who's To Blame?
(CBS/iStockphoto)
Part of the problem in making sense of the Crash of 2008, and all this economic turmoil, is figuring out what really happened. What caused this? What went wrong? And the really big one: Who's to blame?

John Taylor, a professor of economics at Stanford University and a senior fellow at Stanford's Hoover Institution, answers that question in a new book published this week called Getting Off Track: How government actions and interventions caused, prolonged, and worsened the financial crisis.

As you might guess from the title, Taylor concludes that blame lies primarily with the Federal Reserve's unreasonably low interest rates for much of the last decade. He also points an accusatory finger at "the failure to rein in Fannie and Freddie" (meaning Rep. Barney Frank and other Democratic congressional enablers) and "the lack of clarity in the operation" of last fall's financial bailout plan (meaning the Bush administration, plus congressional leaders who drafted the legislation).

In other words, the blame is thoroughly bipartisan.

Taylor is in a unique position to make these judgments: he was a Treasury Department undersecretary in the Bush administration, has been vice president of the American Economic Association, and was a member of President Carter's and President George H.W. Bush's economic advisory boards. Perhaps more importantly, he published a landmark paper in 1993 with a formula -- called, of course, the Taylor rule -- that suggests how high or low central banks should set interest rates.

Interest rate policy sounds like a topic that only an econometrics geek might appreciate, but in reality central banks can cause horrific damage through bad decisions. Interest rates that are too low tend to encourage people to load up on debt, including adjustable rate mortgages, yielding a speculative bubble and then a crash. (This is why a small minority of economists and a few politicians such as Rep. Ron Paul would abolish the Federal Reserve.)

Taylor says that starting in late 2000, the Fed lowered interest rates far beyond what the state of the economy should have allowed. "This deviation from the Taylor rule was unusually large; no greater or more persistent deviation of actual Fed policy had been seen since the turbulent days of the 1970s," he writes. "This is clear evidence of monetary excesses during the period leading up to the housing boom."

To back up that argument, Taylor constructed a model simulating what would have happened if the Fed stuck to a normal policy. If that had happened, he says, "clearly there would not have been such a big housing boom and bust." Two European Central Bank economists who constructed an alternate model arrived at the same conclusion.

Taylor also takes aim at what the Bush administration and the Democrat-controlled Congress tried to do through new laws, bailouts, and regulations. He said last February's so-called stimulus legislation, which delivered tax rebates to many people, led to people spending "little if any of the temporary rebate, and thus consumption was not jump-started." Last fall's emergency steps by the Bush administration created "a great deal of uncertainty about what the government would do" and had "no basis in economic theory or experience."

Even worse, Taylor says, Washington politicians and bureaucrats incorrectly concluded that liquidity, rather than the inability to value deteriorating financial assets, was the problem. Whoops. He writes: "They prolonged (the crisis) by misdiagnosing the problems in the bank credit markets and thereby responding inappropriately, focusing on liquidity rather than risk. They made it worse by supporting certain financial institutions and their creditors but not others in an ad hoc way, without a clear and understandable framework."

Alan Greenspan, who was chairman of the Federal Reserve during that time, defended his ultra-low interest rate policy to CBS News in September 2007, saying: "It was our job to unfreeze the American banking system if we wanted the economy to function. This required that we keep rates modestly low."

Taylor's Getting Off Track serves as a timely reminder that central bankers are anything but omniscient, and that, given the steep losses on Wall Street, Greenspan and his Federal Reserve colleagues at the time may have some more explaining to do.

His little volume -- at just over 90 pages, the advance copy provided to CBS News reads more like an expanded version of an economics paper -- will not be the last word on the Crash of 2008. But it offers an useful and insightful starting point for future discussions, and it could hardly be more timely.

Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz didn't publish their classic history of the Great Depression until a generation later. Competing analyses, also taking issue with Keynesian explanations, didn't appear until the 1960s.

Fortunately for us, Taylor didn't wait that long today.

  • Declan McCullagh is the chief political correspondent for CNET. Declan previously was a reporter for Time and the Washington bureau chief for Wired and wrote the Taking Liberties section and Other People's Money column for CBS News' Web site.

Add a Comment See all 58 Comments
by bigsk8fan March 1, 2009 9:27 AM EST
these bushies never seem to conclude that things that happened on george w bush's watch are george w bush's problems.
Reply to this comment
by jsl45 February 28, 2009 7:14 PM EST
George W. Bush, the Herbert Hoover of the 21st Century....what a loser!!!!
Reply to this comment
by pensacola88 February 27, 2009 10:10 PM EST
I recall the events that were occuring at the time when interest rates went lower and amazingly lower. There was this war in Iraq that wasn't going very well. It was clear that if economic pictures were begining to spoil, the support for the war would erode on as accelerating pace. There was one leading indicator that few watched as interest rates went down - the Euro in the foreign exchange was gaining on the US Dollar at an alarming rate. Then, later oil began to go up at an alarming rate.

It has been long felt that the Bush administration wanted to keep the country anethesized through manipulation of the interest rates. "Making people feel rich, even when they aren't, always helps your popularity in the polls when election time comes."
Reply to this comment
by ioweign February 27, 2009 9:35 PM EST
4) Congress - forcing banks and mortgage companies to make loans to the wrong people. It may sound noble and wonderful, but forcing banks and mortgage companies to make loans to some of the borrowers the last few years was not a smart move

Posted by independenti at 1:10 PM : Feb 27, 2009

And just how did Congress force banks to make bad loans ?

Read below:

The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 seeks to address discrimination in loans made to individuals and businesses from different areas or neighborhoods, and mandates that all banking institutions that receive FDIC insurance be evaluated by the relevant banking regulatory agencies to determine if the institution has met the credit needs of its entire community in a manner consistent with safe and sound operations. The law does not list specific criteria for evaluating the performance of financial institutions. Rather, it directs that the evaluation process should accommodate the situation and context of each individual institution. The law emphasizes that an institution's CRA activities should be undertaken in a safe and sound manner, and does not require institutions to make high-risk loans that may bring losses to the institution. An institution's CRA compliance record is taken into account by the banking regulatory agencies when the institution seeks to expand through merger, acquisition or branching. The law does not mandate any other penalties for non-compliance with the CRA.
Reply to this comment
by dj292009 February 27, 2009 8:59 PM EST
so, Don't blame the way we governed the country as the reason it is ruined?
Posted by dragonwagon5

Nope because there were democrats who refused to listen just like you are doing now. See this Government is made up of Democrats and Republicans, and just like the Republicans, the Democrats did nothing. That Pelosi chick does not want to take on Bush, she knows damn well she is going to loose
Reply to this comment
by vietvet06 February 27, 2009 8:58 PM EST
If the Fed is to blame for the crash, then the military is to blame for September 11, 2001. I say not so on both accounts. The blame rests squarely on the shoulders of George W. Bush, the 'man' at the helm. Even now as republicans desperately clamor for some small glimer of past recognition, Bush is not mentioned for fear of association. In the lexicon of many, certainly Texans, George Bush, that dog just don't hunt.
Reply to this comment
by sockpuppet4 February 27, 2009 6:53 PM EST
What caused this? What went wrong? And the really big one: Who's to blame?

The Bush/Cheney Republicans helped by Corker/Shelby pillaged and plundered what was left of America on the Bush/Cheney exit.

Bush/Cheney, Elite Rich Republicans, and all the Corporate Puppets and Lobbyist Brown Noses should be jailed permanently, and their citizenship revoked.

The best that us remaining true Americans can do to prevent chaos is stimulate the economy in a controlled crash dive into the ground. Purely out of mercy for the millions of innocent.

The chessie cat smirking fat cat carpetbaggers Bush/Cheney Republicans left a desolate America for dead.
Reply to this comment
by lexern February 27, 2009 6:45 PM EST
This book and all comments fall short of what really happened. Does anyone remember the Feds being worried that the stock market was overvalued and their dramatic interest rate increases in early 2000 aimed at slowing down the market. They over cooked the rate increases and crashed the market , remember the dot.com bust. This is where it started, then this book picks up with the Feds decision to correct it's mistake by lowering rates to all time lows which led to the mortgage crisis. If Allan Greenspan and his cronies had not tried to slow down the stock market we never would have seen a market crash and a mortgage crisis. He should be forced to give all of his book proceeds to charity.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey February 27, 2009 6:33 PM EST
[Don't bother to read the links behind it Obama Worshipper. You are as ignorant as they come. By all appearances you are related to what you claim you'll clean up with the WSJ. ]
[Posted by speakinup at 2:08 PM : Feb 27, 2009 ]

is this it? i'm a worshiper? i'm as ignorant as they come? by all appearances ... blah blah blah.

seems to be coming from someone who does some worshiping of his own ... you've got to be kidding ... the wsj op-ed page?

what flavor of their cool-aid do you like the best?
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey February 27, 2009 6:27 PM EST
[Why would they 'deliberately' cause a financial bubble ? ]
[Posted by speakinup at 2:03 PM : Feb 27, 2009 ]

to keep the economy rolling when there was nothing else left to fuel it.

and according to you ... i'm the ignorant one?
Reply to this comment
See all 58 Comments
.

Follow Econwatch

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook