Econwatch
By

Joshua Norman /

CBS News/ April 18, 2011, 10:53 AM

Report: Offshore tax havens cost U.S. $100B

Goldman Sachs is reportedly among the many offenders when it comes to large corporations sheltering their fortunes from the IRS in overseas tax havens.

/ Mario Tama/Getty Images
Adding insult to injury on the day American taxpayers are due to file their returns, a new report by the U.S. Public Interest Research Group states that many of the biggest U.S. companies who took advantage of government bailouts or rely on government contracts regularly hide their money from the IRS in overseas tax havens.

Overall, the U.S. loses approximately $100 billion in tax revenues every year as corporations and individuals shelter their fortunes in foreign bank accounts.

In 2009, President Barack Obama launched a major initiative against overseas tax havens with new tax laws, new reporting requirements and an army of 800 new IRS agents.

"I want to see our companies remain the most competitive in the world. But the way to make sure that happens is not to reward our companies for moving jobs off our shores or transferring profits to overseas tax havens," Mr. Obama said at the time, according to the Washington Post.

However, today's report by U.S. PIRG reveals that the president still has a long way to go.

Some of the report's key findings include:

  • In 2010, making up for this lost revenue cost the average U.S. tax filer $434. That's enough money to feed a family of four for three weeks.
  • The taxpayers who pick up the largest share of the tab live in Delaware and New Jersey. On average, tax filers in those states paid an additional $920 and $752, respectively.
  • Some of America's biggest companies - including many that have taken advantage of government bailouts or rely on government contracts - use tax havens. As of 2008, 83 of the 100 largest publicly-traded U.S. corporations maintain revenues in offshore tax haven countries.
  • Goldman Sachs, which reported more than $2 billion in profit in 2008, was able to use its 29 tax haven subsidiaries to reduce its federal tax bill to just $14 million. That means that Goldman Sachs' CEO Lloyd Blankfein, who made $42.9 million that year, earned more than three times the amount that the company paid in federal taxes.
  • General Electric appears to have paid no federal income taxes in 2010, despite reporting profits in the United States of $5.1 billion. The biggest company in the country, GE has lobbied hard for tax breaks and loopholes in the federal tax code, and shifted many of its profits to tax havens to avoid paying U.S. taxes. GE employs nearly 1,000 people in its tax department to help exploit those loopholes, but has laid off one-fifth of its U.S.-based workers since 2002.

Click on the video player below to watch a recent "60 Minutes" report by Lesley Stahl on tax havens.


© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
28 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
eklacycpa says:
$100B, not even remotely close to the monthly deficit spending or accumulated debt of Obama's DOOMSDAY economic policies.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
anothervoter says:
By David Kocieniewski
The New York Times
updated 6/20/2011 9:03:30 AM ET 2011-06-20T13:03:30

Some of the nation's largest corporations have amassed vast profits outside the country and are pressing Congress and the Obama administration for a tax break to bring the money home.

Apple has $12 billion waiting offshore, Google has $17 billion and Microsoft, $29 billion.

Under the proposal, known as a repatriation holiday, the federal income tax owed on such profits returned to the United States would fall to 5.25 percent for one year, from 35 percent. In the short term, the measure could generate tens of billions in tax revenues as companies transfer money that would otherwise remain abroad, and it could help ease the huge budget deficit.

I just thought this articles might be interesting. I would also like to keep some of my money home a 5.25 percent.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ammo17 says:
who do you think made these income tax laws so that these big companies can have these loopholes.if anyone out there believes our congress runs our country you better think again,our politicians are bought and sold like prostitutes by big money,you can see that by the influence the lobbyist have over them,they cannot make a decision without the OK from"K STREET"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ammo17 says:
gee i wonder who voted all these loopholes into our tax laws.
reply
justme2012 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
congress
linkicon reporticon emailicon
justme2012 says:
Can anyone tell me about this "generation skipping" tax break that Obama gets for his kids?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AttyFAM says:
And why do we have to protect the rich? Why do the rich not have any obligation to the USA? For the US to lose $100B in taxes, means that about $400B in dividends, interest, and capital gains must have been earned. To do that, the rich, the corporations, have to have at least $4 Trillion invested abroad. Invested abroad, not here, not in the USA, not creating jobs here. If anything such earnings should be more heavily taxed in order to encourage the rich to invest at home.

Breathes there the man with soul so dead. who ne'er to himself hath said, This is my home, my native land? Yes, and his name is Republican.
reply
justme2012 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So how much income did Obama invest overseas to get his 20k foreign tax credit?

And what did he do to earn the 820k from foreign countries? Kickbacks for "foreign aid"?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SplittingHairs says:
"What tax havens? We have no DIVINE RIGHT to tax profits earned from the citizens of other countries. That money came from the pockets of the people overseas and *they* have a right to tax it, not us. If that money is kept where it is earned and invested where it is earned then we have no right to *any* of it. There is no "tax haven" associated with this. In fact, it is a xenophobic view to think that people overseas have an obligation to support *our* government spending by sending part of the money from their pockets to our government"

You are literally out to lunch with your logic. The "citizens" of other countries did NOT earn this money and to call it xenophobic" is laughable. A tax haven is simply a paper shuffle, a slight of hand, a card trick so to speak. One simple setup is to create a basic pyramid or triangle scheme (though in the case of very large corporations it will be more of a maze). A holding company off shore (with next to ZERO employees and no accountability) will show the large profit (and hense no US tax payable), which allows the operating company residing in the US to show a MUCH smaller profit on their books. Almost ALL the earning and profits are in REALTY comming from the US (and from the backs of US workers and US economic system), but the paper trail shows the bulk of the earnings coming from an off shore companie(s), when in REALTY the profit is derived in the US and from US workers. Only the paper trail says otherwise. It is nothing more than a charade, "legalized" or loop hole driven stealing (unless you are one that believes US citizens or US business should not pay US taxes on their US generated profits).

The surprising part is not that corporations or wealthy individuals do this (human nature being what it is), but that that they are so brazen, ie, it is done to such a large scale with impunity.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
upside22 says:
What tax havens? We have no DIVINE RIGHT to tax profits earned from the citizens of other countries. That money came from the pockets of the people overseas and *they* have a right to tax it, not us. If that money is kept where it is earned and invested where it is earned then we have no right to *any* of it. There is no "tax haven" associated with this. In fact, it is a xenophobic view to think that people overseas have an obligation to support *our* government spending by sending part of the money from their pockets to our government. Citigroup earned more money in Latin American and Asia than it did in the US last year. If that money stays in Latin America and Asia to fund loans there then why should *we* have any claim on the money at all? It really *is* xenophobia to think the rest of the world exists to support us and to characterize all this as "tax havens".
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Bojax39 says:
Maybe a flat across-the-board tax of 10% would fix a lot of this tax dodging bullsh*t. It'd make less money for the government, but would perhaps force less superfluous government spending. Ahhh, who am I kidding?
reply
justme2012 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Actually a flat tax of 10% would increase government revenue, but it would decrease the "power" they have to control others.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ammo17 says:
i wonder who passed all these tax laws that allow these companies to get away with the screwing of america???
reply
justme2012 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Congress
thadcs replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Congress yes - who is bought by The American Taliban on Wall St. http://******/Mx9XI
See all 28 Comments