Goldman Sachs: No More "Sh**ty" Deals
Sen. Carl Levin quoted an internal Goldman Sachs email which referred to a security the company was selling as a 'sh**ty deal' back at a Senate hearing in April.
/ AP Photo/Charles DharapakGoldman Sachs might still be able to sell a bad mortgage-backed security, but there'll be no more "sh**ty" deals.
The Wall Street firm has told its employees that they can't use profanity in emails, text messages or instant messages anymore, not even ones with asterisks, The Wall Street Journal ($) reports Thursday.
That's 34,000 traders, investment bankers and other employees suddenly seeing their arsenal of four- and five-letter words out of reach. The company will even screen the messages with computer programs to prevent ones that might slip by.
The term "sh**ty deal," if you remember, provided the touchstone moment at an April Senate hearing featuring Goldman executives. Sen. Carl Levin repeatedly - and to comically indignant effect - invoked the phrase in a memorable 10-minute period during which he questioned Daniel Sparks on whether the company was pushing a bad mortgage security called Timberwolf on clients. He quoted an email sent to Sparks, which read: "Boy, that Timberwolf was one sh**ty deal."
Levin then asked: "How much of that shi**ty deal did you sell?"
And "you didn't tell them that you thought this was a sh**ty deal?"
And "should Goldman Sachs be trying to sell the sh**ty deal? Can you answer that one, yes or no?"
There were even T-shirts made.
No word on whether this applies to shorthand forms like "WTF."
Popular on MoneyWatch
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- Chrysler expected to make Jeep recall refusal official
- Chrysler agrees to recall of Jeeps at risk of fire
- 6 ways to pay off your student loans
- Why geniuses don't have jobs
- The Internship: 6 real-life lessons from the movie
- Chrysler continues its refusal to issue a Jeep recall
- Top 10 professional life coaching myths
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- Limited communication skills clearly define the individual without prejudice. The spewers of linguistic fecal matter have simply exchanged speach from the intended exit point to the posterior. The voice is changing but the breath is still the same.
- reply
-
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- spewers of "linguistic fecal matter"... holy sh#* ! By the way, learn to spell.
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- well damn.
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- Congress, specifically Senator Levin, should watch his mouth with everything being televised and goes without saying so should our current administration. Talking like that makes you less of a person that people can look to for leadership. As for Wall Street etc. everyone should have a bar of soap at their desk, ready to shove in when tempted to speak foul because other workers have to sit and listen to it.
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- I'd like to see members of Congress and the current administration also adopt this ban. Using profanity or crude language verbally or in writing merely underscores a lack of intellect and proper breeding.
- reply
-
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- The previous administration was well versed in the use of what some people call profane language. I guess they thought they were in a barroom
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- Wall Street will NEVER be a good citizen!
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- When the doors and windows of goldman sachs and morgan stanley are boarded up the United States will be well on it's way to economic recovery.
- reply
-
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- I can't believe that G/S is even in business, they blew all of their cash, gambled on bad debts and got an economic bailout over politics so they could all be Joe's.














