February 26, 2010 2:27 PM

Four Dems Call for Rangel to Give up Chairmanship

By
Stephanie Condon
Topics
Congress
(GETTY IMAGES/Mark Wilson)
Updated at 5 p.m. ET.

Some House Democrats are reportedly calling for Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) to give up his powerful chairmanship of the House Ways and Means Committee in the wake of an admonishment from the House Ethics Committee, but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi today sidestepped questions about whether she also wants to see Rangel step down from his post.

The ethics committee accused Rangel of accepting corporate money for trips to Caribbean conferences in violation of House rules, but it could not determine whether Rangel knew about the financing. The committee determined that Rangel's staff did know about the financing and said Rangel was responsible for learning the truth.

Rangel is the subject of another larger ethics investigation that is looking into his use of official stationary to fundraise for a college center in his name, as well as his late disclosure of previously unreported assets.

At a press briefing today, Pelosi emphasized to reporters that the ethics committee said Rangel did not violate any rules of the House.

"That's an important statement that they made," she said.

"Obviously, they have other issues to deal with," Pelosi added, referring to the ongoing investigation into Rangel. "I hope that they will have other action soon, but they did not take action against him... We'll just see what happens next, what comes out of the ethics committee next."

Other Democrats, however, think party leadership should make Rangel step down now from his chairmanship.

Democratic Reps. Paul Hodes (N.H.), Gene Taylor (Miss.) and Bobby Bright (Ala.) all said Rangel should step down from his committee post, Politico reports

"Washington must be held to the highest ethical standards," Hodes reportedly said in a statement. "Regrettably, with the finding of ethics violations, Charlie Rangel should step down from his leadership position."

Taylor told Politico that Rangel "should step down, or at least step aside until all this is resolved."

Rangel said last night at a news conference that "common sense dictates that members of Congress should not be held responsible for what could be the wrongdoing or mistakes or errors of staff unless there's reason to believe that member knew or should have known, and there is nothing in the record to indicate the latter."

His office released a statement today saying that Rangel participated in the trips to the Caribbean after the ethics committee approved them.

"The committee found that the Chairman did not have actual knowledge that the trip could be in violation of house rules," the statement said. "Having now learned that the trip reimbursement was made erroneously, Congressman Rangel will of course refund the funds in question."

The National Republican Congressional Committee also told Politico Rangel should step down.

Pelosi "promised the run the 'most ethical congress in history' and instead the voters got an out-of-touch, tone-deaf majority that appears to be belly flopping into the very swamp they promised to drain," NRCC spokesperson Ken Spain said.

Update: While Rangel said he relied on information from the House Ethics Committee in deciding to attend the Carribean trips, the ethics committee says that Rangel's aides tried at least three times to show him his trips had corporate sponsors, the Associated Press reports.

Rangel reportedly denies seeing any of these written communications, which included two staff memos sent to him in 2008 and a letter addressed to him in 2007. The committee's report says investigators could not determine whether or not Rangel actually saw them.

Add a Comment See all 88 Comments
by dwilson59 February 28, 2010 11:23 AM EST
Just one Question?

How does this story have anything to do with Bush and the War?

I mean the guy did not pay his taxes and other stuff. He should step down.
Reply to this comment
by babooph February 28, 2010 8:31 AM EST
How can this be-the propaganda system says these guys are "public servants" I did not understand that meant crook,[also thought a mercenary & contractor were a bit different-also thought lie & spin were....also thought journalist & groveling propagandist were..]
Reply to this comment
by wfw3536 February 27, 2010 11:14 PM EST
The democrats will not do anything when it is one from their party. I am surprised the press even wastes their time reporting this. The whole thing will be covered up and this crock and tax cheat will be allowed to stay in congress and chair the finance committee in the HOuse of Rep that establishes our tax laws.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt February 27, 2010 11:07 PM EST
by jschmidt27 February 27, 2010 10:35 PM EST
guess you really are blind. Too much kool aid, pal.
--
No.

Just an objectib=ve look at the facts.

Blix was investigating WMD's in Iraq for the UN.

Dubya called for the invasion before Blix and his team finished their mission.

ALL FACTS.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt February 27, 2010 9:43 PM EST
by jschmidt27 February 27, 2010 9:31 PM EST
-"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear
---
If, being the operative word. pal.

Bush invaded before Blix determined that there were no WMD's.....
Reply to this comment
by jschmidt27 February 27, 2010 10:35 PM EST
guess you really are blind. Too much kool aid, pal.
by formrusmcsgt February 27, 2010 8:38 PM EST
by jschmidt27 February 27, 2010 8:24 PM EST
doI really have to publish the quotes from all of the Democrat leaders, Clinton(both), Pelosi, Reid, Kerry, Gore, that said we had to go in after Saadam?
--
Go ahead.

None of them called for invasion.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt February 27, 2010 8:49 PM EST
Well go ahead..what are you waiting for?
by formrusmcsgt February 27, 2010 9:16 PM EST
Well, after 45 minutes to do so and nothing from jschmidt27.....I rest my case.
See all 4 Replies
by platteman February 27, 2010 8:11 PM EST
There is a saying that voters should have to pass ain intelligence test! then the other statement says, You don't have to be intelligent to vote. The next question is, what if there are more stupid people than intelligent people. Answer is The Democrat Wins. Seems Stupid people vote for Old Charlie and will continue to do so and Queen Nancy has spun this so much that Bill O'Rielly is having a hard time unspinning this whole mess. Queen Nancy needs to man up and tell Charlie, it is over. But she won't because she needs to keep Old Charlie in his place so she can weave more corruption into govt. Time to drain the swamp Nancy.
Reply to this comment
by jxknowles February 27, 2010 9:59 PM EST
I have to agree with you. Look at how many stupid people it took to elect Bush once, then turn around and make the same gaffe four years later! I mean seriously, how stupid can you get?
by jxknowles February 27, 2010 7:28 PM EST
When you are taking Carribean vacations as an elected official, it is imperative that you do everything in your power to make sure it is on the up and up. Rangel did not. It was a dumb thing to do. When you do dumb things you have atone and take your punishment. Rangel should step down from his Chairmanship. The voters can decide if he deserves another term.
Reply to this comment
by jschmidt27 February 27, 2010 8:27 PM EST
What about the tax evasion on not reporting rental income? Why aren;t we seeing Holder going after him? Because he is a Democrat.
by jxknowles February 27, 2010 10:11 PM EST
I believe those investigations are continuing and he is making reparations as required by law.
by formrusmcsgt February 27, 2010 7:12 PM EST
by jschmidt27 February 27, 2010 6:58 PM EST
Blame Bush for what?
--
Surely you jest....
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt February 27, 2010 7:06 PM EST
by jschmidt27 February 27, 2010 6:58 PM EST
Blame Bush for what? You'd have to indict all of the Dems in Congress as well.
---
Considering that the repubs held a majority in both houses for 6 of dubya's eight, I hardly think so....
Reply to this comment
by jschmidt27 February 27, 2010 8:24 PM EST
doI really have to publish the quotes from all of the Democrat leaders, Clinton(both), Pelosi, Reid, Kerry, Gore, that said we had to go in after Saadam?
See all 88 Comments
.

Follow Political Hotsheet

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook