Harry Reid Says GOP Should "Stop Crying" About Reconciliation

(AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
Reid said reconciliation had been used 21 times since 1981, mostly by Republicans when they were in control of the Senate for the passage of items like the Bush tax cuts. (Here's a handy chart of when the procedure has been used.)
Under reconciliation, Democrats would need a simple majority in the Senate to pass legislation, as opposed to the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster.
"They should stop crying about reconciliation as if it's never been done before," Reid said.
Following Senate Democrats' weekly luncheon, Reid said "nothing is off the table" but that "realistically, they should stop crying about this. It's been done 21 times before."
"The question is: Is reconciliation the only way we can do health-care reform?" he said. "The answer to that is no. But I've been told that my Republican friends are lamenting reconciliation, but I would recommend for them to go back and look at history."
"It's done almost every Congress, and they're the ones that used it more than anyone else," he added.
In his own press availability Tuesday, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said "it appears as if the administration has already made up their mind to go forward with a beefed up Senate version and to try to jam it through under a seldom-used process that we commonly refer to around here as reconciliation."
Republican Whip Sen. Jon Kyl told reporters that "it's hard for us to quite understand why, with reconciliation being planned, we're having a meeting [Thursday] which is allegedly designed to engender some bipartisan agreement for a way forward."
"It seems to me at least that, until the Democratic leaders take reconciliation off the table, it'll be very hard for Republicans to believe that they intend to engage us in good faith," Kyl added.
Will Obama Health Care Plan Pass Via Reconciliation?
A War of Words Before the Health Care Summit
Obama's Health Care Plan at a Glance
Popular in Politics
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- The Ted Cruz conundrum
- Petraeus biographer regrets affair
- As summer approaches, sequestration threatens holiday fun
- Senators lack votes on immigration despite progress
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen. 201 Comments
- Senator: Oklahoma "hit hard, but we're not knocked out"
- GOP Rep.: Obama elected because of Reagan's immigration reforms













I'm a racist? No, I'm not, I'm a realist.
Since they were the party that held the majority in the first 6 years of the last 8 year debacle. They squandered their chance to make change in this country and are now trying to lay the blame of the entire country's problems on this President's shoulders.
If this process fails, it will be Democrats and this President who will be looking for a new address out of Washington DC.
1. Block everything in Congress
2. Midterm election claim government does not work, obviously Dems fault (enough idiots will believe it bcuz they love to HATE something)
3. Win back House and Senate, then WH in 2012 because Obama did not lead
4. Then go back to cutting taxes for only the wealthiest and for largest companies, cut regs for banks and insurance
Who pays them to do this? Coal, Oil, Insurance, Bankers... all the wealthiest... nice investment for them, too.. will become even filthier rich as the middle class disappears
How has all that worked out for the economy and for We the People?
Republicans are the enemy within our borders, they're doing everything in their power to stop our government from functioning, they root for and cheer on domestic terrorism and hope for destruction and distaster to hit our country. All so they could have a political advantage in the next election.
It's funny how Republicans who claim they love America so much suddenly want to destroy her when they're not in power.....
"Reconciliation was only supposed to be used for Budget issues and was never intended to be used for legislation (Healthcare)"
---------------------------------
Proof that you republiCONS have a serious need to re-write history.
Reconciliation has been exploited by both sides to make policy changes without facing a filibuster:
What is the precedent for using reconciliation to enact major policy changes? Much more extensive than the architects of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 had in mind-or than Senate Republicans are willing to admit these days. Reconciliation was designed as a narrow procedure to bring revenue and direct spending under existing laws into conformity with the levels set in the annual budget resolution. It was used initially to cut the budget deficit by increasing revenues or decreasing spending but in more recent years its primary purpose has been to reduce taxes. Twenty-two reconciliation bills were passed between 1980 and 2008, although three (written by Republican majorities in Congress) were vetoed by President Clinton and never became law.
Whether reducing or increasing deficits, many of the reconciliation bills made major changes in policy. Health insurance portability (COBRA), nursing home standards, expanded Medicaid eligibility, increases in the earned income tax credit, welfare reform, the state Children's Health Insurance Program, major tax cuts and student aid reform were all enacted under reconciliation procedures. Health reform 2009 style would be the most ambitious use of reconciliation but it fits a pattern used over three decades by both parties to avoid the strictures of Senate filibusters.
I watched the health care summit today. It was a bunch of rich folks who have socialist health care in a socialist building. They go there on our socialist roads and were being protected by socialist police and security forces. They were using stuff they got through the socialist post office using wood products from our socialist forests.
Oh no, socialism. Be afraid. Be frightened.
1. There's no point in debating those who don't have the capacity to recognize when they're dead wrong.
2. Shaking hands with a rabid dog will only get you bitten.
3. If you were confronted by a crazy person on the street, babbling nonsense, would you engage that person in conversation on our health care needs? No, you politely ignore them, and GO ON ABOUT YOUR BUSINESS.
It's time to stop wasting our breath on those that are too stupid to see what a mess the republicans have made of this country.