Marco Rubio: We Should Obstruct Democrats' Agenda
(AP)
"2010 is a referendum on the very identity of our nation," Rubio said at the opening of the annual Conservative Political Action Conference. "Many of the old rules of political engagement will not apply."
The former Florida House Speaker is an upstart candidate challenging Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, who has been stigmatized in large part by a picture of Crist embracing the president at an event in support of Mr. Obama's stimulus package.
Rubio told a supportive CPAC crowd that Democrats are not trying to improve America as the country attempts to come out of recession, but rather change it -- and that conservative voters want candidates who stand in the way.
Candidates, he said, who will operate like the giant piles of compact, dirt-splattered snow that still stand tall along the streets of Washington, after a week of record-breaking snowfall.
That snow, Rubio said, was "the best thing to happen to the American economy in 12 months."
Washington was brought to a halt by the storm.
"The Congress couldn't meet to vote on bills," Rubio said to cheers. "The regulatory agency couldn't meet to set new regulations. The president couldn't find anywhere to set up a teleprompter to announce new taxes."
While voters want politicians to work together, Rubio said, "that comes with a very important caveat: it depends on what they're trying to do."
"America already has a Democrat party, it doesn't need two Democrat parties," he added.
One of Rubio's most high-profile supporters, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), said obstructing the Democratic agenda will pave the way for a new Republican majority and help the GOP regain the public trust.
"I would rather have 30 Marco Rubios in the Senate than 60 Arlen Specters," he said.
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Communications Director Eric Schultz released a statement following the speech knocking it as a rehash of "the same old, worn-out Republican talking points that led to economic collapse in the first place."
More Coverage from CPAC:
Dick Cheney Urged to Run for President at CPAC
Mitt Romney: Obama's Agenda Is "Reckless"
Washington Unplugged: Sen. Jim DeMint On CPAC, Tea Party Movement
Popular in Politics
- Obama to view Oklahoma tornado damage Sunday
- IRS' Lerner: "I have not done anything wrong" 670 Comments
- Christie: Keep politics out of Oklahoma disaster relief
- WH says criticism of its handling of IRS story is "legitimate"
- Former Miss America might challenge McConnell
- House passes GOP bill to speed Keystone XL pipeline approval
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor 121 Comments
It took me all of 30 secconds to learn that you plagerized Barry Goldwatter. All you have to do is give him credit for the statement to make it legal
We outlaw our farmers from growing America's number one cash crop in the US. Of course it keeps all this money underground, and no taxes collected. Sheer stupidity and irresponsible waste of tax dollars.
Amen!
23% of all Americans over the age of 18 have Registered to Vote. Of this number, an average of 52%, over the last 35 years, do walk out to vote.
Therefore, 12% of Americans, over the age of 18, do actually bother to vote.
Shame on our Democracy and WE THE PEOPLE!
I know it is very sad that so many Americans don't take their right and responsibility to vote seriously (but hey sure as he!! will gripe and moan..) but, your numbers may be off.
If the country has a TOTAL population of [roughly] 306 million, 12% equals about 37 million people. About 129 million voted in the last presidential election.
You may have gotten the stats wrong...?
So far, this Obstruction is paying big Dividends to Republicans. Only fools expect an incentive for Republicans to work with President Obama.
ex-President Ronald Reagan started our Debt.
ex-President Ronald started our Division. I remember clearly every time Ronald Reagan spoke in public, he would never miss the opportunity to say "...see, there goes the liberals again...". This started the Partisian game that president Obama is trying hard to cool-down.
We all know perfectly well that Americans have NO (ZERO) savings.
We all know Perfectly well that Americans have Reached the Maximum limit on their Credit Cards.
The only thing left to Spend is to convert our Assets such as our house which we re-mortgaged with Equity in order to buy that nice Expensive HDTV, iPhone, Nexus One and all the other 'Made in China' electronic gadgets and toys which nobody needs.
Still, American blame their Government. Like my grandfather always said to me "government is the Rear-View-Mirrow of WE THE PEOPLE".
Our country has REPRESENTATIVE government. People who want to blame the government for all their problems need bigger mirrors!
Our Country is falling deeper in debt. It's falling ever deeper under the control of special interests. It's bogged down in two wars that it can't seem to bring an end to, and, it's "enemies" in these two wars realize the best thing they can do to hurt our country is to keep us there, bogging ourselves down ever deeper. While all of this happens, WE continue to give ourselves two choices: "Democrat" or "Republican", "Liberal" or "Conservative", The Same or The Same. It's time we threw both of these failures out by their ears! Demand better! This idiot "Rubio" is no different than the people he condemns, like "Obama", "Reed", and "Pelosi". We don't need any of them!
"I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution ... or have failed their purpose ... or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is 'needed' before I have first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible. And if I should be attacked for neglecting my constituents' 'interests,' I shall reply that I was informed that their main interest is liberty, and in that cause I am doing the very best I can."
November is quite a ways off when you consider the mercurial pace of politics. And, there is this story we all heard as children, the one about the tortoise and the hare. I put my money on the tortoise, it remains to be seen whether the turtle wears a (R) or a (D), yep. But I have feeling, just a deep feeling....
Oh well. We'll see -- when the voters come out of hibernation.
So, yes...elections will decide it. But, the elections so far havent been good for Obama.
While a Senator (MA)or a House Rep (NY) does have a national result, the politics during "off season" elections is also primarily local -- though both MA and NY had national interest.
President Obama couldn't sink the ball for the (D) candidates, yep. But clear evidence exists that he did help. Frankly, in my opinion Jesus and Moses appearing with two of the three couldn't have gotten them elected.
My point concerns the "regular season" national elections. I'd like to see more interest, that is for sure.
An example: Senator Brown won his MA seat with less than 30% of the registered voters. President Obama won the presidency with the votes of approximately 33% of voting age Americans across the country (of course, with the Electoral College, a Presidential race is entirely different than a Congressional race.)
I like the idea of people being involved in the country's future.
My biggest complaint to the Conservatives is they never share why they are Good or Great or Better. Instead, I read the opposite. I am still waiting patiently.
The people I know who are truly conservative want limited government, fair tax rates and reduced spending with a balanced budget, enhanced national security and a commitment to both the US Constitution and the idea of US greatness in the world.
Why any of these people vote for Republicans is beyond me? History tells us that any three or four of these specific points are quickly jettisoned as soon as the votes are counted. Of course, people will say -- well, Democrats are no better. True, when you use the conservative measurement criteria... but, then Democrats are not the ones that tout "conservative values".
I was sort of hoping a real capital "C" Conservative Party would spring up from all the energy that's been spent (tea parties, etc) -- but it looks like they are just going to fold their tents into the Republican umbrella...again! Sad and too bad.