Bayh: No Chance I'll Switch Parties

(AP Photo/AJ Mast)
"I've had a growing conviction that Congress is not operating as it should. There is much too much partisanship and not enough progress," he said yesterday, announcing he would not seek reelection this Fall.
CBS News Congressional correspondent Nancy Cordes reports Bayh becomes the 9th Senator to announce he's retiring at the end of this term: Four other Democrats — Roland Burris, Ill; Christopher Dodd, Conn.; Byron Dorgan, N.D.; and Ted Kaufman, Del. — and four Republicans — Kit Bond, Mo.; Jim Bunning, Ky.; Judd Gregg, N.H.; and George Voinovich, Ohio.
Watch Evan Bayh's Announcement from Monday
GOP Smells Opportunity over Bayh's Exit
Bayh said he was bitter over the bipartisanship he's seen, but said he held no grudge against the Democrats.
"I'm not angry at my party," Bayh said on CBS' "The Early Show" this morning. "I wish Washington would work better.
"What we need to do is to come together as a people and solve the problems facing our country. And unfortunately Washington is just not doing enough of that these days."
Bayh disputed the suggestion that his announcement blindsided the Democratic Party leadership. "I had discussed with Senator Reid as long as a year ago my growing feeling that Congress was just not working as well as it should, that there is much too much partisanship and too much ideology, not enough practical progress. And so with several of my colleagues, including the leadership, I'd shared that opinion, and you know, in the hurlyburly of making these announcements, sometimes phone calls get delayed."
Bayh, who had never lost an election and who comes from a family which has long served in public office, was reportedly ahead in the polls against major names competing for the Republican nomination.
When asked if his late announcement (the deadline for submitting petition signatures to get one's name on the ballot is this week) hurts Democrats and might hand his seat to the Republicans, Bayh responded, "Those critics must not know my state very well.
"Hoosiers are very independent. There are five Republicans running, they're going to have a vigorous primary. I don't know who their nominee will be. And I am highly confident that we will have a candidate for the United States Senate who will be very competitive and have an excellent chance of winning this seat in November."
He also dismissed the suggestion that he might switch parties and run against President Obama in 2012. "No possibility whatsoever," Bayh told "Early Show" anchor Maggie Rodriguez. "As a matter of fact, I talked to the president yesterday and said I was looking forward to working with him over these next 11 months to try to make the progress I know that he so desperately wants.
"And let me say this: I think the president, you can disagree with his policies if you want to, but he is making a sincere effort to try to bring the two sides together, to try and find some common ground, to forge that practical progress that Americans are so yearning for. And I want to help him over the next 11 months to make that kind of progress."
Bayh did admit that he has no future plans. "I would tell you, but I don't know. I'm going to — what we call in Indiana, in basketball — I'm going play until the final second ticks off the clock, and then think about what's next.
"But if I could create one job in the private sector by helping to grow a business, that would be one more than Congress has created in the last six months. If I could help educate our children at an institution for higher learning, that would be a noble thing. If I could help a charity, cure a disease or do something else worthwhile for society — that's what has motivated my life and that's what I think Congress needs to focus on, things that will help the American people meet the challenges they face in real ways in their daily lives. That's what I want to do with my life. And if you'll invite me back on your show in 11 months, I'll be able to tell you!"
Watch the interview below:
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 422 Comments
- Poll: Most think IRS targeting was deliberate 160 Comments
- Obama: "Full focus" is on recovery from Oklahoma tornado 76 Comments
- Top IRS official to invoke 5th Amendment at congressional testimony 92 Comments
- Former IRS chief: "I can't say" what led to IRS targeting
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK 1131 Comments
- IRS scandal highlights leadership vacancies
- Letter to a young scandalmonger














<a href=?http://www.flightstosydney.com.au? rel="dofollow">whats on in Sydney</a>
<a href=?http://www.flightstosydney.com.au? rel="dofollow">whats on in Sydney</a>
...clearly you do not understand how our government functions and the definition of certain terms....the Republicans have NOT filibustered so much as 1 single bill since Obama was elected..do a little research. What don't you understand about filibuster proof Senate (until a week ago).
_________________
Above:
Example of someone who is so incredibly misinformed about how our government works, but completely convinced they do know.
And then they have the temerity to call out another poster using their oen lack of knowledge. chillycat should be ashamed of this hypocrisy, or at the very least embarrassed by their ignorance and arrogance.
=========
The Republicans have filibustered an unprecedented number of times during the previous (110th) and current (111th) Congress with Democrats in the majority. A filibuster proof majority does not mean the tactic can't be used.
It is true, due to procedural rules passed in order to not inconvenience our "kings and queens" of the Senate, they no longer have to actually hold the floor for hour after hour -- they merely threaten the action and a vote for cloture must be taken in order to end debate and move a Senate action forward. This vote for cloture needs 2/3 of the Senate to pass.
The "super majority" (2/3) is necessary to end debate, AKA invoke cloture. Filibuster and cloture are procedural steps leading up to Senate action. The [threat of] filibuster is used to delay getting to an actual vote (what is called an "up and down vote"). It takes 60 Senators to invoke the vote for cloture and advance a bill to where it can be voted on (or a nominee confirmed). The actual action-passage/confirmation needs only 50 votes (plus the VP tie-breaker vote) to pass.
Learn something about your country -- especially before you call someone else out for not knowing the facts.
The whole system is rotten and needs to be radically changed. We need to unite against the top 1% and stop big corporation rape and pillage.
Every day there are stories like this that shows how blatantly corrupt our entire system is. We all need to unite against the top 1% and take down the rich, greedy big corporations that have taken over our government, Mafia style. These folks are the REAL ENEMY!!!!!!!!!
As for Congress--it is broken and people are too stupid to see that first and foremost those who intentionally obstruct should all be voted out--that would be the mainstay Dems and the loud mouth always saying No Republicans.
We ought to vote all those who have had over one term out and tell the new ones:
1. You no longer get to name your own salary
2. You no longer get to give yourself raises
3. You no longer will get health care for life at tax payers expense
4. You will no longer be pensioned for life at tax payers expense.
give them a nice salary for the term they are in and do not allow people to try for re election--this is a sure way to stop favoritism, lobbyist interest and prevent career politicians and cronyism it also means people can start caring about their real principles and ideas and voting their conscience since they would only get one shot and one term at the job.
the workers money.