December 9, 2009 4:05 PM

Who Should Get Obama's Nobel Prize Money?

By
Brian Montopoli
Topics
White House
(AP Photo/Torbjorn Gronning)
President Obama will accept the Nobel Peace Prize In Oslo Thursday – an award that comes with roughly $1.4 million.

His speech will be closely watched, in large part because it marks the odd circumstance of a war president accepting a peace prize. Mr. Obama is accepting the Nobel just a week after he announced his decision to add 30,000 troops in Afghanistan, effectively recommitting the United States to a war that began more than eight years ago.

He plans to address the irony in the speech, which he is drafting himself. Norwegian peace activists have planned protests in conjunction with the address.

But there is another noteworthy issue tied to the president accepting the prize: namely, where will all that money go?

In October, shortly after the surprise announcement that the award would go to Mr. Obama, the White House said the president would donate the $1.4 million to charity.

"He mentioned specifically to me on Friday that the money would be donated to charity," spokesman Robert Gibbs said then. "There will be a process to evaluate that from his perspective. I assume it will be many different charities."

Since then, however, the White House has repeatedly declined to make clear which charity or charities might get the money. Wednesday morning Gibbs again said there has not yet been a decision.

Under the law, Mr. Obama can designate a charity or charities to receive the money and avoid any tax liability. There could be a complication to this, however, as CBSNews.com's Declan McCullagh noted last month: The Peace Prize is closely linked to the Norwegian government, and the U.S. Constitution limits gifts to government officials from any "foreign state." The White House has argued that the prize doesn't come from a "foreign state," even though members of the Nobel committee are current or former government officials.

Teddy Roosevelt won the prize but still asked Congress for permission to distribute the money to charity, and some lawmakers want Mr. Obama to follow suit.

It appears, however, that the White House is making its decision unilaterally. The politics of who to select are somewhat dicey, since the award will justifiably be taken as an endorsement. (As a reporter joked to Gibbs in October, "I assume we can rule out ACORN as a recipient?")

  • Quick Poll
Who Should President Obama Give His Nobel Prize Money To?
 The Red Cross
 The Salvation Army
 Habitat for Humanity
 CARE
 The United Negro College Fund
 The United Way
 Someone Else
There are three large charities that seem like obvious potential recipients: The Red Cross, Salvation Army and Habitat for Humanity. All three are widely beloved, though their roots as religious organizations could complicate the calculus. Habitat, which is dedicated to building "simple, decent, affordable housing in partnership with people in need," may be the best fit for a president trying to stress Americans rebuilding in the wake of the financial crisis. Mr. Obama also recently participated in a public service announcement for the United Way.

Last year the Obamas donated $172,050, or 6.5 percent of their income, to charity, according to White House figures. A tiny percentage went to faith-based groups; the biggest recipients were CARE, which fights global poverty, and the United Negro College Fund, which both received $25,000.

"Given the nature of the prize – it is a recognition of the work he is doing to ensure global peace – I would suspect that the donations will go to organizations very specifically involved in work to provide to bring peace around the world," United Negro College Fund President & Chief Executive Officer Michael L. Lomax told CBSNews.com. He said he would be "pleasantly surprised" if his organization were a beneficiary.

There is a potential awkwardness to Mr. Obama giving the money to an organization that works to "bring peace around the world," however – that group may not be too happy with the president's decision to increase the troop presence in Afghanistan. To give the money to a group whose leader opposes Mr. Obama's efforts would be a public relations problem for a White House looking to win skeptical Democrats over to its new Afghanistan strategy.

Add a Comment See all 35 Comments
by orgchart1 February 21, 2010 12:37 AM EST
Its 2010. When will we find out where the money went? I don't understand why its a secret. I expect the president to do what he says at all times.
Reply to this comment
by jnazium December 11, 2009 6:59 PM EST
The prize should go to the treasury. It is the property of the US government and therefore the people of the United States of America. It is not his to give away, no matter how worthy the charity.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/15/AR2009101502277.html
Reply to this comment
by antorjal December 11, 2009 12:30 PM EST
At least Obama's prize is in the full amount. Next year, the Nobel Committee might actually downsize the prize money (via Reuters)!

More details here: http://******/7ronHr
Reply to this comment
by maxcoffee-2009 December 10, 2009 1:18 AM EST
Rush Limbaugh is getting married again. He could send it to him as a weddding present. Fourth times a zinger!
Reply to this comment
by wtcmedicdidntforget December 10, 2009 12:24 AM EST
perhaps paying back the tax payers for his date nights?
Reply to this comment
by maxcoffee-2009 December 10, 2009 1:14 AM EST
You know? The President does draw a salary for the work he does. When he goes out on a date with his wife it?s not like he stops a big vault labeled ?tax payers money? and just takes a big handful and saunters off. Get over it all ready.
by DSR_57 December 10, 2009 1:52 AM EST
maxcoffee-2009, Um yes, it is pretty much exactly like that
by dakotaclark December 9, 2009 10:38 PM EST
Hmmm...

I think it would be more meaningful for President Obama to donate small amounts to all the food banks in the USA and territories.

Please note: The Society of St. Vincent de Paul works in the front line trenches of the war on poverty. Yet, article writers rarely mention the work done by this charity - helping people in need with rent, utilities, food and medicine.
Reply to this comment
by wtcmedicdidntforget December 10, 2009 12:25 AM EST
your kidding, right? you think any of those wealthy politicians will do that? your be better off with steven king, gates, jobs vs. a politician.
by PVperson2 December 9, 2009 9:38 PM EST
Answer me this you neo-con fatheads, when was the last time any of you refused an honor or gift, assuming any of you EVER had either?
Reply to this comment
by RatPackSixGun December 9, 2009 11:35 PM EST
The stomp stomp of your party line combat boots is drowning out your vaccuous rhetoric. Let me guess, you ACORN flunkies are sore that you couldn't slip in the back door at the WH with the other uninvited guests?
by wtcmedicdidntforget December 10, 2009 12:27 AM EST
and you got what? the hall monitor award in elem. school? If i spent money the way he does and especially tax payer money playing around youd better believe id donate it.
by nowhiningallowed December 9, 2009 7:35 PM EST
...the U.S. taxpayers...an early Christmas gift...
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage December 9, 2009 7:22 PM EST
I believe he needs to give the money back!
Because he's excepting it under 'false pretenses'!
He's NOT a 'peace' President!
He's done more to promote violence and war, than peace and harmony!
Reply to this comment
by mljohns00 December 9, 2009 6:28 PM EST
Donate it to Osama Bin Laden. When OBL comes to get his prize, we can arrest him. That's our best chance.
Reply to this comment
by nordeck52 December 9, 2009 7:20 PM EST
Wow, your comment is great. And the funny part is I agree completely. Its brilliant!
See all 35 Comments
.

Follow Political Hotsheet

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook