Political Hotsheet
By

Lucy Madison /

CBS News/ September 24, 2012, 11:43 AM

In Massachusetts, Senate race takes negative turn

(CBS News) With several recent polls showing Democrat Elizabeth Warren with small leads in her Massachusetts Senate bid, Republican incumbent Sen. Scott Brown is out with a new attack ad targeting Warren's character, marking a new negative turn in the closely-watched race.

The ad, entitled "Who Knows?", rehashes claims that Warren improperly identified as Native American in order to further her career. Using a montage of television news clips explaining the controversy - in which it was revealed that Warren in the past listed herself as Native American on some professional forms without documentation proving her heritage - the Brown campaign targets Warren's personal credibility. Featuring a clip from a previous interview, the spot features Warren responding to a question about whether or not there was anything else about her "that's going to come out about you that we don't already know?" "You know, I don't think so, but who knows?" she says, laughing.

With three polls last week showing Warren pulling ahead in the race - although one poll from last week showed Brown in the lead - "Who knows?" is the first of the Massachusetts Senate campaign to go after a candidate on personal terms. The Brown campaign points out that Warren was the first to start airing attack ads, although those ads, "Fighter," and "Too Often," released on September 13 and 18 respectively, go after Brown's record, not his character.

Brown has hammered Warren over the Native American claims for months, but the issue had recently fallen out of the headlines somewhat after months in the spotlight. In a debate with Warren last week, however, Brown aggressively targeted Warren over the allegations, calling on her to release personnel records from Harvard, where she was a law professor, to prove she did not receive an advantage for being a minority.

"I don't know and neither do the viewers know whether she got ahead as a result of that checking of the box, but the only way that we'll be able to find that out is to have her release her personnel records, have Harvard release their personnel records to make sure that she did not have an advantage that others were entitled to," Brown said last Thursday. "When you are a United States Senator you have to pass a test, and one of character and honesty and truthfulness. And I believe, and others believe, that she has failed that test."

The Brown campaign says the issue matters, and points to last week's Suffolk poll, which had Warren with a 4-point lead over Brown and indicated that "liar" is one of the top words voters associate with Warren's candidacy.

Even as Brown casts himself as a moderate Republican who is willing to work with President Obama, Warren has repeatedly tied him both to Wall Street and to national Republicans, essentially arguing that a vote for Brown is a vote for a GOP takeover of the Senate - and the policies that could result from a Republican majority.

Democrats are fighting to hold on to their slim majority in the Senate, and a Warren victory in Massachusetts could be critical to that effort.

"Sen. Brown is saying, 'I'm going to go to Washington and I'm going to help put the Republicans in control. I think we oughta think about what the implications of that are," Warren told Politico in an interview published Monday.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
54 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
audemus says:
Brown's feeble attempt at trying to pass himself off as anything but the Tea-Party Boot-Licker he is would be laughable if it weren't so indicative of the sorry state of affairs American politics has fell into. One of these "mutants" claiming to have character, honesty and truthfulness, is like Joseph Goebbels claiming to be a realist.

As for Warren's assertions of being Native American, a great many people in this country have Native American ancestors, and are extremely proud of that heritage. Simply because Warren doesn't possess a piece of paper saying she is an Indian, or a CDIB (Certified Degree of Indian Blood) Card, doesn't mean or prove anything other than the FACT that a great many Americans of Native descent were not included on the genocidal so-called "final rolls" of the various tribes compiled by the U.S. government. In my particular case, being of Tsalagi descent, Cherokee...my Relatives of the Eastern Band of Cherokees in the 19th century, fled to the hills of North Carolina to keep from being forced marched to Oklahoma on what came to be called The Trail of Tears...and a great many of these brave souls do not appear on any list of Native Americans compiled by the American government. Nor do they wish to.

The Democrats are not only going to maintain control of the Senate, but they are going to keep the Presidency, and regain the House. America has seen thru this Angry White Man's Party, and it's made most of us sick. RIP Republicans...and GOOD RIDDANCE.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pinetreewest says:
Such explicit slime by Brown, so irrelevant, has a greater chance of landing on him than her. Bye, Bye, Mr Nice Guy because to the greater number of people you and your party really suck. Enjoy retirement with that other great Republican from your state, Willard M. Romney aka "Son of the Boss".
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
Massachusetts, is a mindless state, that only knows Democratic Party dictatorship.

They will accept nothing else. They have been assimilated. The political machine, is all that remains.
reply
nygurl1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
And that was a totally mindless post.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AOCGUY says:
What Warren did was claim that she had native American heritage (which was true, albeit small) which was perfectly within the rules and did most likely give her a leg up over others she was competing with at the time. Whether one likes it or not it is no different that Romney taking perfectly legal measures to avoid paying more taxes than the government required him to do. May not pass the "I want to brag about it" test but also hardly reason to dosqualify either candidate.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Dancing-in-the-Streets says:
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012

Hillary/Elizabeth 2016 : )
reply
Dancing-in-the-Streets replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Theres an empty chair talking to you Barry!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Paul_I says:
"When you are a United States Senator you have to pass a test, and one of character and honesty and truthfulness." Really Scott?!? The Senate is certainly full of characters but really, really short on honesty and truthfulness.
reply
Dancing-in-the-Streets replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
When he posed in the magazine, did that add to his character?
Dancing-in-the-Streets replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/celebrity/news/scott-brown-nude-in-cosmo
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jaylah54200 says:
Let's try not to forget that Elizabeth Warren was the person who attempted to blow the whistle on the whole derivatives scam. But the stock market just kept going up and up (based entirely on smoke and mirrors) and the TeaPublicans didn't want to own up to what was going on, so the Bush administration essentially gagged her. Re-wrote her job description to where she couldn't do anything and just let the free-fall continue.
reply
RollotheNorman replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yep, the RepubliCON Senate wouldn't approve her as head of the CPA. LOL, she'll get to spit in Mitch's eye!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stormerF69 says:
Elizabeth Warren practiced law from her office at Harvard,with out a license,that alone is against the law.
reply
signseeker1717 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Warren TAUGHT law; you don't need a license for that.
RollotheNorman replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
People who argue cases at SCOTUS do have to have judicial credentials to argue before the Supremes, but necessarily be admitted to the MA Bar. She would not have been allowed to represent clients before the SCOTUS is she were not properly credentialed.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jaylah54200 says:
Ah, typical TeaPublican. When ya got nuthin', haul out the personal attacks.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ThatSkepticGuy says:
You know where you're not hearing much about Elizabeth Warren's mythical momentous lead over Scott Brown?

In Massachusetts, where the people who will actually be deciding the issue are elocated.

SHUCKS, it's almost as if the bulk majority of Warren's support -financial and otherwise- comes from out-of-state and seems to be centralized within the confines of elitist Hollywood, mainstream media and her political bedmates instead of the actual people who will be deciding the issue.
reply
retmw1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Guess brown is't any financial aid from the rnc super PAC's. Last I checked none of those super PAC's are from Mass.
reasonableargument replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If you want to talk about fundraising in this campaign, check your sources first. Brown has collected a much higher percentage of his funds from big-money donors, as well as from PACs. There's money flowing in from out of state on both sides of this race, because it's of national importance. The numbers show that Brown's campaign is at least as colored by that as Warren's. Here on the ground in MA, Warren has stirred up a huge number of volunteers; I can't remember ever knowing as many people who were excited about a political race and actively working to support a particular candidate.
See all 54 Comments