Political Hotsheet
By

Mark Knoller /

CBS News/ September 3, 2012, 7:36 PM

Obama attacks Romney with extended football metaphor

Barack Obama

President Barack Obama waves to supporters after speaking a campaign event at Scott High School, Monday, Sept. 3, 2012, in Toledo, Ohio.

/ AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais

(CBS News) TOLEDO, Ohio -- In what may be the longest football metaphor ever spoken by a presidential candidate in American politics, President Obama on Monday portrayed Mitt Romney as a "losing coach" whose game plan should be "punted away."

At a Labor Day event sponsored by the United Auto Workers Union, Mr. Obama seized on a comment Romney made in Ohio after the Republican Convention that "he's gonna be the coach that leads America to a winning season."

Actually, Mr. Obama left out the part of Romney's football analogy that targeted him. It was a swipe at the number of unemployed and underemployed on Mr. Obama's watch.

"If you have a coach that is zero and 23 million, you say it's time to get a new coach," said Romney last Saturday at a rally in Cincinnati.

Nevertheless, Mr. Obama downplayed Romney's chances of delivering a winning season for the economy, saying, "Everybody's already seen his economic playbook."

And then, as if he were the play-by-play man on the presidential gridiron, Mr. Obama began his call of Romney's game:

"On first down - he hikes taxes...by nearly $2,000 on the average family with kids in order to pay for a massive tax cut for multi-millionaires."

"Sounds like unnecessary roughness to me," said the president to cheers from his audience of union members.

"On second down: he calls an audible and undoes reforms that are there to prevent another financial crisis and bank bailout. He wants to get rid of rules that are there to protect our air and water and workers' rights and protections that are there to make sure health care is there for you when you get sick."

Democratic Convention 2012: complete coverage

"Then on third down, he calls for a Hail Mary - ending Medicare as we know it - by giving seniors a voucher that leaves them to pay any additional costs out of their pocket."

Then - as if a whistle sounded:

"There's a flag on the play! Loss of up to an additional $6,400 a year for the same benefits you get now."

"That's their playbook," said Mr. Obama of the Romney-Ryan ticket. "That's their economic plan."

His post-game advice to football fans/voters, when it comes to the Romney-Ryan game plan: "Punt it away. It won't work. It won't win the game. You don't need that coach. That's a losing season."

The four downs described so pointedly by Mr. Obama clocks into the record books at two minutes and 13 seconds. And to hear the president tell it, Team Romney has no chance of scoring and if his game plan were implemented it would amount to a massive political fumble.

It remains to be seen if we'll hear Romney offer a play-by-play on Mr. Obama's leadership as if it were a round of golf.

But Mr. Obama had more to tell his UAW audience jammed into a local high school gym.

Trumpeting his administration's bailout of the auto industry, he said that if America had turned its back, GM and Chrysler wouldn't exist today. Its suppliers and distributors would have suffered "and that even Ford could have gone down as well."

"In communities across the Midwest, it would have been another Great Depression," the president said.

"I stood with American workers. I stood with American manufacturing. I believed in you," the president said, raising his voice to a crescendo as he does when trying to close the deal in his campaign speeches.

"I bet on you. I'll make that bet any day of the week. And because of that bet - three years later - that bet is paying off for America."

Reminding his crowd that Romney opposed the auto bailout and once said he would let Detroit go bankrupt, Mr. Obama portrayed the other party as anti-worker and anti-union.

"What they're saying is - the problem is that you - the workers - made out like bandits in this whole thing. That we did what we did because it was all about paying back unions."

The president said "even by the standards of political campaigns, that's a lot of you-know-what" - an apparent reference to a barnyard epithet.

He told rank-and-file union members and their families that he didn't understand how the Romney-Ryan team had "the nerve to talk about you like you're some greedy special interest that needs to be beaten down."

And whenever his audience booed its opposition to something said by Romney, Mr. Obama reminded them: "Don't boo - vote."

Union leaders preceded Mr. Obama's speech - telling their members in crucial Ohio that Mr. Obama showed he had their back and now is the time to have his.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
36 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GOP-R--Con-Men says:
Why aren't reporters or Democrats asking republicans if America would be better off if they had not obstructed every bill the president and democrats proposed to help struggling Americans?

In other words no honest discussion can be had on the lack of progress of the economy and President Obama without also talking about the role obstruction of bills, legislation by republicans has played in that lack of progress
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
eroteme2 says:
A rather mild criticism if compared to accusing Romney of being a murderer, a felon.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
john-27 says:
Obama is right. Romney wants to help his kids have a better life, in other words, he wants things better for the rich. Greedy republicans. They would take money from old people by getting rid of medicare, just so the rich could have more money and have a better life. Nobody should vote republican, even the prejudice.
reply
eroteme2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Do not believe Romney is inerested in his children having a better life, he most likely hopes his children will lead an honorable life.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wfw3536 says:
Obama is so out of touch when two thirds of folks in our country believe we are headed in the wrong direction. But I guess it explains why Obama keeps saying, his plan is working.
reply
Minton100 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Hey Amigo, if you're correct, 2/3 of America doesn't support the President of these great United States, why is he on the verge of being re-elected for four more years?
john-27 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Have his plans been fully implemented, or have the republicans 'adjusted' his plans to fit their agenda more? That's why Obama's plans haven't worked. This is proof that Americans need to think before they vote.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
John_Merritt says:
I am not real fond of chumps. If I don't like a person I don't even speak about him. If I have a platform with a prepared speech I march on. If I have key campaign strategies I elucidate. If that is all this campaign to going to bring, America is in worse shape than we could ever imagine. This campaign will get uglier, but it is post victory by whomever that will be marked with more partisanship, maybe more than ever before. Woe is us.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GOP-R--Con-Men says:
Why aren't reporters or Democrats asking republicans if America would be better off if they had not obstructed every bill the president and democrats proposed to help struggling Americans?

In other words no honest discussion can be had on the lack of progress of the economy and President Obama without also talking about the role obstruction of bills, legislation by republicans has played in that lack of progress.
reply
askagain replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So that explains why the President hasn't given us a Federal budget in three years. How low is your IQ?
GOP-R--Con-Men replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
askagain,

Republicans have admitted to sabotaging America and President Obama and you think that unpatriotic, subvertive party deserves to run our great nation?

Hell No!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erichsh says:
Obama just loves football metaphors, doesn't he? He's out there "spiking the football" every day regarding Osama - despite his assertion shortly after the mission that he would not.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
E_In_Houston_TX says:
Come on, people!
What genius in Team Romney advised him to go anywhere near any sport metaphor in attacking the President? Romney knows absolutely nothing in sports. Give him a fighting chance. Play to his strength. Let him stick to economic, marketing, sales and financial metaphors.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
guyfrompa46 says:
Wouldn't it be nice if Obama could actually show what good his administration has done over the past 4 years then use football coach analogies. It's pathetic. 20 million without jobs a 16 trillion deficit and this is what he comes up with? What a joke
reply
iamproteus replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Another idiot! Are you related to DawnGurl?
debbyt1-2009 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wow..you don't even know the numbers. if you can't count, don't vote. And if you would care to look, there are many wonderful things that have gotten done despite the Republican blockade. If you ask people what they don't like about The Affordable Healthcare act, and yes most don't even know the real name of it, they will tell you things that aren't even in it. If you can't educate yourself to facts, don't vote. If you can only listen to the liars out there and don't have time to seek the truth, don't vote.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DawnGurl says:
Perhaps the dumbest metaphor ever. We need to loose this loser ASAP. He is as dumb as a box of rocks. Jimmy Carter looks like a genius compared to this buffoon!
reply
iamproteus replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You cons have only insults to contribute to the conversation. Hell, you don't even know the difference between "lose" and "loose". Allow me to enlighten your stupid a$$: you have a LOOSE screw and you will LOSE the debate. Idiot!
erichsh replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If I had to rank my displeasure between a liberal, a grammar Nazi, or someone who doesn't know the difference between "lose and "loose" (all three bug me), I'd put a grammar Nazi. I can deal with opposing political opinions (when done respectfully) or common innocent grammatical mistakes. But those who snidely and condescendingly correct the mistake, and use said mistake to either ignore or sneeringly dismiss the underlying point - I have no use for you. That snotty arrogance is just loathsome, regardless of your point of view.
See all 36 Comments