Romney abortion view overrides Ryan in Akin response
AP Photo/Jason E. Miczek
(CBS News) MANCHESTER, N.H. - Vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan's strong views on abortion took a back seat to his new boss's view in a Romney-Ryan campaign response to a Missouri Senate candidate's controversial remarks about rape and abortion.
The statement on behalf of Ryan and presumptive Republican nominee Mitt Romney said the pair would "not oppose abortion in instances of rape."
Rep. Todd Akin suggested to St. Louis station KTVI on Sunday that if a "legitimate rape" occurs, "the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down." Even if a pregnancy did result, Akin said, "The punishment ought to be on the rapist and not attacking the child." He later said he has empathy for rape victims and acknowledged that rapes can cause pregnancy.
"Gov. Romney and Congressman Ryan disagree with Mr. Akin's statement, and a Romney-Ryan administration would not oppose abortion in instances of rape," the campaign said in a brief statement released on Sunday evening by Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul.
Romney rebukes Akin rape remark
Paul Ryan's anti-abortion rights record a target for Obama camp
Mo. Rep. Todd Akin: Rape rarely leads to pregnancy
Ryan, R-Wis., holds a 100 percent voting record with the National Right to Life Committee. As far back as Ryan's 1998 campaign, he is described as only finding abortion acceptable if the life of the mother is in danger, according to multiple articles in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that are referenced in a fact-checking article about Ryan's views. He also opposes any exceptions to a procedure known as partial-birth abortion, according to the article.
When asked earlier this month whether his views have changed since his 1998 campaign, a spokesman for Ryan told CBS News that Ryan does believe some exceptions can be made by families and their doctor when the life of the mother is at risk
Still, Ryan may have gone even further in his opposition to abortion last year when he co-sponsored the "Sanctity of Human Life Act" - also known as a "Personhood Amendment" - that sought to designate the start of human life at fertilization. The bill did not designate what exceptions, if any, would be allowed.
While Ryan's views on abortion appear to be longstanding and deeply held, they have not played a central role in his congressional career. Neither Ryan's official website nor his campaign website include a section on social issues. An essay Ryan authored for The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, in 2010 ties his views on the definition of life to the issue of economic freedom, an issue he discusses much more frequently.
"I write as an unswerving proponent of both free market choice and the natural right to life. It is unfortunate that 'life' and 'choice' were ever separated and viewed as alternatives. This is a false dilemma. Logically, each implicates the other," Ryan wrote. "I am deeply committed to capitalism, the 'system of natural liberty'... Free markets create unparalleled prosperity and have a moral basis in freedom and choice."
Popular in Politics
- Obama and Berlin: Faded echoes meet new realities
- FBI director acknowledges domestic drone use
- Senators: U.S. must take "more decisive" military action in Syria
- Smooth, on-time Obamacare rollout no sure thing: GAO
- House Republicans pass 20-week limit on abortions 276 Comments
- Obama renews push for a nuclear disarmament legacy
- Immigration reform would cut deficit, analysis shows 76 Comments
- GOP Sen. Murkowski backs same-sex marriage















Another thing, Romney/Ryan might be able to prevent low-income women from seeking an abortion. However, high-income women would just leave USA to seek a Vacation-Abortion. For example, Canada/Europe where women actually have rights. You ever wonder why Churches are showering Romney/Ryan with money? I wouldn't be surprised if Romney/Ryan think women should be subservient to men, they're nothing more than a couple of Male Chauvinist Pigs!
http://www.facebook.com/ChristiansForObama
http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2012/0730/Pass-a-Violence-Against-Women-Act-that-protects-American-Indian-women
I am sure that it is no coincidence that 1/6th of the much maligned ACA is reform to health care for Native Americans.
The battle over Wisconsin Assembly Bill 426 also demonstrates GOP disregard for Native American Treaties and the US Constitution.
@KPeters....I agree...the Tea Party is the absolute worst thing that could have happened to the GOP...along with the Evangelicals. They have become a bunch of irrational extremists who do not care about what is best for the majority of Americans. Their focus seems to be primarily on social and personal issues rather than how to fix the economy and other important issues we are facing.
---------------------------
I too agree. These people also don't have enough insight to realize they are the dupes of the plutocrats either. While they run around thinking they're "saving" the country and pretend they're "John Galt" they don't have a clue that they're creating the very society of stiffling government overreach and mediocrity run by a select few that the fictional character was struggling against. Sort of the ultimate irony, but Tea Party and evnagelicals aren't noted for their intelligence and insight.
I think you are all getting a bit paranoid.
---------------
The post about the "personhood laws" being used to prosecute women who've had miscarriages. Sorry, wish it was just paranoia. But its already been done! : (