Political Hotsheet
By

Steve Chaggaris /

CBS News/ August 8, 2012, 6:33 AM

Bill Clinton denounces Romney welfare criticism

President Clinton in London, May 22, 2012.

/ Getty Images for Clinton Foundation Fundraiser
(CBS News) After Mitt Romney criticized President Obama for "taking the work requirement out of welfare", former President Clinton - who signed the 1996 Welfare Reform Act - came to Mr. Obama's defense.

"After the law was enacted, every state was required to design a plan to move people into the workforce, along with more funds to help pay for training, childcare and transportation. As a result, millions of people moved from welfare to work," Mr. Clinton said in a written statement sent late Tuesday.

Clinton explained that Romney's criticisms of Mr. Obama, where Romney suggested in a TV ad and on the stump that the president removed the work requirement from the welfare law, were "disappointing."

Romney has honed in on a memo issued last month by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that will allow states to apply for waivers from certain parts of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. The move, sought by several states, is meant to allow states more flexibility in meeting the work requirement. "The Secretary is interested in approaches that seek to improve employment outcomes," the memo says.

Romney accuses Obama of "taking the work requirement out of welfare"

"The recently announced waiver policy was originally requested by the Republican governors of Utah and Nevada to achieve more flexibility in designing programs more likely to work in this challenging environment," Mr. Clinton added. The Administration has taken important steps to ensure that the work requirement is retained and that waivers will be granted only if a state can demonstrate that more people will be moved into work under its new approach."

"The Romney ad is especially disappointing because, as governor of Massachusetts, he requested changes in the welfare reform laws that could have eliminated time limits altogether," the former president said.

The Obama campaign maintains that the new HHS policy does not remove the work requirement. It called Romney's statements untrue and hypocritical and noted that some Republican-led states had sought the new waiver policy.

For his part, Romney's campaign isn't backing down and released a new web video Wednesday hitting Mr. Obama for not supporting the 1996 welfare bill. It features a quote of then-Illinois state senator Obama saying "I was not a huge fan of the federal plan that was signed in 1996" along with clips of other Democratic senators, including Joe Biden and John Kerry, announcing their support of the bill.

"President Obama was a vocal opponent of the innovative, bipartisan welfare reforms that President Clinton and a Republican Congress passed in 1996," Romney spokesman Ryan Williams said in a written statement. "His administration has now undermined the central premise of those reforms by gutting the welfare-to-work requirement."

CBS News/National Journal reporter Sarah Huisenga contributed to this report.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
30 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
magicbymark says:
"The Romney ad is especially disappointing because, as governor of Massachusetts, he requested changes in the welfare reform laws that could have eliminated time limits altogether," the former president said.

Romney is a hypocrite and ads like this prove it. Has this man done anything right during his campaign?
reply
RollotheNorman replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Willard categorically denies ever being Governor of MA.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RCRawlings says:
Obama wants to enlarge welfare state by ending work-for-welfare
Government "transfers" or financial assistance is at its highest level on record, of more than $2400 billion a year. But if that POS in the White House has his way, that spending will go up even more, way more.

Our present welfare system is a result of a reform during the Clinton Administration, which requires able-bodied welfare-recipients to work or at least try to find work. But Obama means to undo that reform, which will put even more people on welfare.
reply
WHAT-IS-HE-SMOKING replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If you would read, the federal government moved the part of the work-for-welfare to the state where the republicans, including Mitty who signed a letter back in 2005 wanted it.
SilverBirds-RevSlappy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
What
That's a left wing Clinton lie and you believed it.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ammo17 says:
i just hope when the obamam`s leave the whitehouse in january they do not try to steal the glassware and silverware like the clinton`s did.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
audemus says:
There's nothing new about republicans promoting lies....after all, they have a rather stupid base to feed.
reply
nottblu replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Apparently you haven't seen any of the comercials aired by the democrat superpacs. Your ignorance to truth and fact proves who's base is stupid.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
michaelz06 says:
Another typical political back and forth....each side giving just whatever "facts" that support their slant to the discussion, while strategically ignoring the rest. It is a sad commentary on American politics that every election that I can remember has boiled down to a "lesser of two evils" choice. This go around, that choice is clear to me, but that doesn't mean that I am going to wildly embrace the guy I hope wins....
reply
RCRawlings replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Hey poindexter, that's what this comment site is for.
If you are so enlightened, why are you here?
Go hob nob with the other egg head wannabes
michaelz06 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RCRawlings, I was actually referring to the politicians, not the name calling clowns that make repeated derogatory comments to each other here, in lieu of actual intelligent discourse. Sadly, from some of your other posts, we are probably on the same side of the fence. Personally, I take no solace in that fact.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RCRawlings says:
So which is the biggest lying first "Black" president?
Slick Willie or Barry?
One said " I did not have sex with that woman'
The other says, 'You didn't build that'

Billy Boy is now back pedaling on what he did that was the complete opposite of the Food Stamp and Welfare President did.

How can you tell when Bill and Barry are lying?
There lips are moving!
reply
RCRawlings replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
'"Their" lips are moving'
linkicon reporticon emailicon
B_Erhart says:
World banksters & corporations WERE bailed out by US taxpayers who were

put 'on the hook' by the Federal Reserve for $30 TRILLION US.

ARE the bankster/corp types going to give us back some 'workfare'?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
OBAMA4ALLAH- says:
It looks like Bill's nose is growing more bulbous and bright red with every new lie he tells. It's looks like a boozers snoot.
He better watch it or it may explode on video.
reply
bilrobi1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It looks like President did his homework. Exactly how has he lied ? You can attack his appearance but it really means you don't have any facts so petulant adolescent comments comments do nothing to prove your point (or lack of)or enhance credibility. I think he looks okay for a man his age,but even if he didn't,It wouldn't make him wrong.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SilverBirds-RevSlappy says:
by Homeless-Person August 8, 2012 11:26 AM EDT
Good ol BJ Billy Boy. What's on her dress?



LOL!
Slick Willie ruined a blue dress.
Obama ruined America and has it in the Red in more ways than one.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
The Democratic Party wants the entire voter base on welfare, to guarantee they will vote for the Democrats, and no one else, to keep their welfare.
reply
liberalmike replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You sounf like an idiot!
liberalmike replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Oh wait you are a frekin' idiot!
See all 30 Comments