10 people who won't be Romney's running mate
Gen. David Petraeus
/ AP Photo/Musadeq SadeqMitt Romney appears on the verge of selecting his running mate from a shortlist that is believed to include Rob Portman, Tim Pawlenty, Paul Ryan, Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal. There have also been other names mentioned as potential running mates - including Gen. David Petraeus and Michael Bloomberg - despite the fact that they almost certainly will not be tapped to run alongside Romney. The following is our list of people who won't be vice president despite the speculation:
10 people who won't be vice president
FEATURE PAGE: Romney's vice presidential choice
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 434 Comments
- Top IRS official to invoke 5th Amendment at congressional testimony 126 Comments
- Senate committee approves immigration bill
- Poll: Most think IRS targeting was deliberate 172 Comments
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK 1200 Comments
- Obama: "Full focus" is on recovery from Oklahoma tornado 85 Comments
- U.S. IDs several men possibly responsible for Benghazi attack
- Former IRS chief: "I can't say" what led to IRS targeting














Remember, Romney he was actively running for president in 2007 and 2008, and he KNEW he was going to be running in 2012. That means it's nearly certain those years should be able to withstand scrutiny. So why not at least release the last 5 years?
Because on October 15, 2009, this happened: "Wealthy U.S. taxpayers, concerned about an Internal Revenue Service crackdown on the use of secret overseas bank accounts as tax havens, are rushing to meet a 10/15/2009 deadline to disclose those accounts or face possible criminal prosecution. The concern was triggered this summer when Switzerland's largest bank, caught up in an international tax evasion dispute, said it would disclose the names of more than 4,000 of its U.S. account holders.
The decision shattered a long-held belief that Swiss banks would guard the identities of its American customers as carefully as they did their money, and it raised concern that other international tax havens might be next. Under an amnesty program, the IRS is allowing taxpayers to avoid prosecution for having failed to report their overseas accounts. As a result, tax attorneys across the nation have been besieged by wealthy clients who are lining up to apply even though they will still face big financial penalties."
We KNOW Romney had money in Switzerland - he has said so himself. Therefore, the logical conclusion is that Romney doesn't want people to know he was intentionally (and illegally) hiding money from taxation in Switzerland. There is no criminal prosecution because the IRS granted an amnesty, but it WAS ILLEGAL - and he knew it.
No wonder he is keeping them a secret - releasing them would destroy his candidacy.
The fact it WAS illegal and the IRS granted an amnesty is not a conservative or liberal issue - it is a fact in the public record.
I would say you should check your facts before your ignorance shows, but - TOO LATE. I know conservative extremists never allow facts to enter into the conversation, like the propaganda that Obama has "hidden his personal history" - which is nonsense.
Why isn't Romney reeleasing his tax returns like EVERY OTHER Presidntial candidate has done for decades?
A lender requires more tax returns than Mitt provides just to qualify for a mortgage.
Pathetic.
I'm thinking Reid is right. Mitt probably hasn't paid taxes in a decade and that's what keeps him from releasing the returns.
But I don't think Huntsman would have anything to do with Romney.
Huntsman has scruples.
Also please note that there is an enormous difference between knowingly partnering with drug cartels to launder their money (which DID NOT happen, even the DOJ has already stated that) and having small gaps in your process. The Nevada Gaming Commission has extremely strict rules to monitor for this kind of activity and it got by them as well, so it most likley not an actual criminal event.
Attack Romney for real things - there are more than enough of them. See my post above.
Seriously, anyone know how he did this? I'm sure it must be legal but how did he get around the max contribution? Anyone know?