Political Hotsheet
By

Lucy Madison /

CBS News/ August 2, 2012, 12:03 PM

MoveOn blasts "Rafalca Romney" as horse makes Olympic debut

Ann Romney, left, the wife of U.S. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney applauses after her co-owned horse Rafalca attends in the equestrian dressage competition, at the 2012 Summer Olympics, Thursday, Aug. 2, 2012, in London.

/ AP Photo/Markus Schreiber

(CBS News) Despite some Democrats' hesitations to criticize Mitt Romney for his wife's participation in the sport of dressage, the liberal group MoveOn.org is hammering the candidate over his association with the activity, suggesting in a new ad that the Republican presidential candidate cares more about his wife's horse "Rafalca" than the American people.

On Thursday, just as Ann Romney's co-owned horse Rafalca made its Olympic debut in debut in dressage, an equestrian event in which "horse and rider are expected to perform from memory a series of predetermined movements," MoveOn.org announced a three-state, five-figure ad buy for a spot called "Rafalca Romney," which targets the presumptive Republican presidential nominee for threatening to repeal President Obama's health care law while simultaneously paying $77,000 a year to care for a "pampered" horse.

The ad features a talking horse, purported to be Rafalca, suggesting that Romney would treat the American people worse than he treats his horse, and plays up the notion that dressage, a little-known sport in America, is elitist and ridiculous.

"After Mitt Romney repeals health care and ships your job overseas, I dare say your life will not be nearly as pampered as mine," says the horse, in a high-pitched voice. "After all, you're not one of his horses."

"In our ad, voters hear the truth about Mitt Romney straight from the horse's mouth: Romney seems to think many Americans deserve to be treated worse than a horse," said Justin Ruben, executive director of MoveOn.org Political Action, in a statement. "There's nothing wrong with taking good care of a horse, but there's something messed up about a millionaire who spends twice what most Americans make in a year caring for a horse, but wants to take away people's health care and offshore their jobs."

Both Rafalca and ads targeting her have been a source of controversy in recent weeks, as Ann Romney traveled to London to watch the horse compete in the games. Satirists and some Democrats have ridiculed Rafalca, while others have declared the topic off-limits on the campaign trail.

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) apologized earlier this month after releasing a video that featured the horse.

Meanwhile, during his visit to London last week, Romney raised some eyebrows when he said he did not plan to watch Rafalca compete in the event.

Political spectators on both sides of the aisle have been paying attention to Rafalca's Olympic participation for another reason, as well: Romney is not expected to announce his running mate until Ann Romney returns home from London, which could ostensibly give Rafalca some hand in determining the timing of is announcement.

After her Thursday performance, Rafalca earned a score of 70.213, putting the horse, along with her rider, Jan Ebeling, in provisional fourth place with a number of horses yet to compete, according to the Associated Press. Ann Romney watched attentively from the audience.

According to the AP,  the seven highest-scoring teams from Thursday's dressage event move on to a second competition on August 7. From there, the top 18 individual riders will compete on August 9 in a contest to determine individual medal scores.

Neither the DNC nor the Romney campaign commented to CBS News on the propriety of the ad.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
39 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jimzien says:
Polls show that most horse owners favor a single-hayer type health care system with no crapitation.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cubscout09 says:
Who would dope up a lame dressage horse on four different tranquilizers so that they could sell the horse to an unsuspecting buyer for six figures? A normal human being would put the poor horse out to pasture, to live out its life in peace. I'm not so sure that I would want to be one of Romney's horses.
reply
nygurl1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Where on earth did you get that blurb from?
I'd like to see that info first hand!
And I am not a mitty fan!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lindag20 says:
This stupid horse is typical of the Romneys. I don't care if they own a horse, but how on Earth can anyone call the upkeep of it a "medical expense"? It really hits a nerve with me as my ex-husband used to whine and complain about paying child support, calling it "theft" while he had NO problem supporting his current wife's horse.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sandy 1027 says:
I have no problem with the Romneys having the horse, but it seems like a stretch to take a $77,000. write off for it on their income tax return in 2010.It may be legal as a medical deduction, but this wasn't a wheelchair , a special bed, nor anything of that nature, but a horse that's used in a leisurely way, although possibly therapeutically.The question becomes "Should we all just write off Persian cats because they help lower blood pressure or visits to spas because of backaches"?Seventy-seven thousand dollars is nothing to the Romneys, and it really seems like an abuse of the system.
reply
Digitalcamotim replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
writing off expenses for comfort animals has been accepted by the Service for well over two decades===and that includes cats best that you dont talk about things you dont know anything about in order to further your racist attacks on Governor and Mrs Romney
nygurl1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If this is a therapeutic horse, why isn't SHE riding it?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Dressage4SmartPeople says:
Mr. Ruben from MoveOn.org should do a little homework before he speaks on what he does not know. There are many of us, middle class, liberal/independent thinkers who find Dressage anything but elitist or ridiculous! What a sexist comment to make. A married woman can not have an invested interest separate from her husband?! Many Dressage riders husbands share the same lack of interest in Dressage as Mr. Romney does. To incorporate him in the comment about treating Americans worse than he treats "his" horse is invalid and irrelevant. It isn't his horse nor does he participate in the sport. Your ignorance in this article makes me lose respect for your organization. Stick to the facts!
reply
Digitalcamotim replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nazi censor, your anti-Mormon racism is showing Governor Romney does not have plural wives his family is much further away from polygamy than obama whose muslim pappy was a polygamist btw, if you want to use his proper LDS title, it would be President Romney as he was a Stake President after he was a Bishop
linkicon reporticon emailicon
EdThesled says:
How eff'ing STUPID is THIS?! At a time when we are being bombarded day and night with ads in every form of media, telling us to support our olympic efforts, Romney is a bad guy for owning one of the horses that competes in an Olympic event?!?
reply
Digitalcamotim replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hey nazi censor, this horse is in the US 77,000 includes much money paid to Americans for working
nygurl1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The horse is his wifes.
.
The horse is an expensive luxury that mast cannot afford.
.
Dig - I'm not sure what you are talking about. The horse is in England. IT cost $77,000. No one got a job out of it unless mitty hired a barn hand.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wfw3536 says:
How sad Obama and his backers resort to such a desparation attack on Mrs Romney and an event that horse and many animal lovers enjoy. I guess when you can't run on a failed economic record you will go into the dirt.
reply
EdThesled replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
To ZionistCensorship

You comment on something you know nothing about.
You make assertions that are completely false.
You advertise your vile anti-semitism through your nickname.
You experience the "thrill" of being a leftist toady while ignoring the fact that fellow leftist toadies Bruce Springsteen and Steven Spielberg are part of the rich-guy horsey-owner set.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
nygurl1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wfw - Since the President has no control over the PAC your argument is stupid.
.
Sory Z - they don't use jockeys in dressage. The rider is just as well trained as the horse.
.
ed - YOU have been commenting you know nothing about - so?
.
What are the falsehoods?
.
No antisemitism except what your twisted mind sees.
.
What thrill? ...You on drugs?....do you see either one of them parading their wealth all over the newspapers and running for president because they can?....Has it occurred to you that THEY may be a better candidate than mitty-richie!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TimeToEvolve says:
Why does anyone want to support RobMe who has pledged to RAISE taxes on 95% of Americans to pay for tax cuts for himself? Or RAISE the national debt by $5 trillion.

I thought these were big issues for conservatives and Republicons. All they have been doing in whining about these things for YEARS about Obama and the Democrats.

And does anyone have any clue about any plan RobMe (or any other Con for that matter) has to help American workers? Did they not run in 2010 on job creation? Anyone? Anything?
reply
EdThesled replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Do you have a clue about anything you are commenting about? Every one of your assertions about Mr. Romney is completely and totally false. Perhaps you should change your nickname to TimeToLearnHowToReadSomethingOtherThanTheOfficialDNCTalkingPoints.
nygurl1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ed - no matter how much you say he's lying....he has the proof to back up his statements.

Where are yours?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TimeToEvolve says:
Whether RobMe earned the money immorally or not is not the point. If he paid what he should have in taxes and what he owns and hides IS the point. Especially since he extracted that wealth from America and it's citizens. In other words, we ALL had a stake in his business.
reply
EdThesled replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You REALLY don't know what you are talking about, do you?
EdThesled replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ZC: Citing a CBS/NY Times Poll?!?! LOL!!!!!!!!!! Look up the word objective please.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
audemus says:
There's nothing wrong or inherently evil about being successful and filthy rich, nor spending $ 77,000 a year on a horse's care ( although I think there are more important things to spend that kind of money on, but that's just me ), ...and neither you or me have the right to impose our own morality on anyone else....but if the combination of extreme wealth and extravagance is coupled with anything more than simple dis-connectedness from reality, say tax-evasion, then we have a problem.
reply
EdThesled replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jack Kennedy was richer than Romney. Does that mean he was a bad President?
nygurl1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
What's the matter ad? You don't feel the love?

No ed - he wasn't a bad president, but he wasn't as rich as mitty either.
See all 39 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right