Political Hotsheet
By

Lucy Madison /

CBS News/ July 16, 2012, 10:33 AM

Pro-Romney super PAC earns $20 million in June

Updated: 12:40 p.m. ET

(CBS News) Less than two weeks after Mitt Romney's campaign announced a fundraising haul of $100 million in June, shattering its own record and trouncing the Obama campaign by some $30 million, the pro-Romney super PAC Restore Our Future confirmed to CBS News Monday that it raised $20 million in the same month.

The group's June earnings represent a new monthly fundraising record for the group. It's also more than three times the amount brought in by its pro-Obama counterpart, the super PAC Priorities USA Action, which on Friday announced a $6.1 million haul in June.

"It is no surprise that wealthy Republicans from Wall Street and the oil industry are investing millions in false and misleading attacks on President Obama," said Bill Burton, co-founder of Priorities USA Action, in a statement. "Millionaire Republicans have high stakes in this election -- they know that in a Romney administration, they will make millions when their industries are deregulated, regardless of the devastating impact on the middle class."

The latest numbers reflects a recent struggle among pro-Obama forces to compete with Romney advocates' abilities to bring in enormous monthly fundraising totals.

(Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said "angry old white men" buying 2012 election in the video on the left.)

June was the second month in a row that the Romney campaign outraised the president's re-election campaign. Restore Our Future, meanwhile, has consistently topped Priorities USA in its fundraising efforts.

Still, June's earnings were significant for the pro-Romney PAC: In May, it earned just a fraction of last month's haul, at $4.6 million, and $20 million is more than twice than it had earned in any previous month alone.

The consistently staggering monthly earnings brought in by advocates of both parties are indicative of the increasingly expensive nature of the 2012 political cycle. According to an analysis by Kantar Media's Campaign Media Analysis Group (CMAG), the volume of presidential spending on campaign ads in a number of crucial campaign territories is much higher than it was at this point in 2008. For instance, the group's analysis shows that presidential ads in Columbus, Ohio have doubled since this point in the 2008 campaign.

Moreover, super PACs, which can spend unlimited funds to support a candidate as long as they do not directly coordinate with the candidate's campaign, are not the only outside groups making political contributions via sometimes-shadowy methods: A recent Wall Street Journal report showed that unions, which skew heavily Democratic, are spending approximately four times more on politics and lobbying than is generally assumed. And the GOP-friendly U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which has said it plans to spend $50 million on the 2012 election, recently announced a new strategy that will allow it to continue to invest heavily in political spending without disclosing the identities of its donors, as the Washington Post reported in May.

Last month, Romney and billionaire industrialist brothers David and Charles Koch held a hush-hush three-day retreat with wealthy donors designed to bring in contributions. The semi-secrecy of the retreat mirrors the secrecy that currently exists in the world of campaign financing. The Romney campaign, unlike the Obama campaign, refuses to disclose its bundlers, which makes it more difficult for the public to assess what his biggest donors might expect in exchange for their money.

In a memo sent out by the Romney campaign Monday,  Romney campaign pollster Neil Newhouse argues that the race between Romney and Mr. Obama is "narrowing," as evidenced, in part, by the contention that "Barack Obama V. 2012 is not keeping up with Barack Obama V. 2008."

"Four years ago today, candidate Barack Obama led John McCain 47.0%-42.5% (+4.5%) in the Real Clear Politics average of polls. Today, the race is even tighter for now President Obama. The most recent Real Clear Politics average puts the race at 46.8% Obama-44.4% Romney (+2.4%)," Newhouse writes.

The Obama campaign, meanwhile, continues to hammer Romey over his history at Bain Capital, and is turning up the pressure for the Republican candidate to release more information about his financial history.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
5 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
abby_del_abbey says:
Our democracy is being purchased by the uber-rich. The 1% want their man in the White House. Then they can reach their goal of utter and complete control of America.

America, the United States of Corporations -- government of, by, and for the 1%
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jrarch says:
This election is a test of our democracy. Obscene amounts of money channeled to Romney from the yacht set in order to gut regulations which safeguard our water, air, financial assets, and access to education and health care. If Romney buys the presidency, this country will end it's slow continued growth. The poor and middle class will work harder for junk made in other third world countries and the owning class parties on as though we don't exist. Most of us can look forward to a diet of cheap affordable junk food, toxic toys and gadgets made elsewhere - but plenty of profit for wall street until the pyramid collapses. Vote Obama to stabilize the economy into the future and protect the country and it's citizens.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
littleoldguy says:
Just one question: How will Romney pay the super PAC doners back if he were elected? (Same question for Obama, although in a smaller scale since his super PAC is way behind Romney's in raising money)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dragontats says:
Romney is a lying, lowlife cultist. What does that say about the people who support him?

One point- He and his handlers and the sycphants talk about how much Romney gives to charity. The extremely large majority of that so-called charity money is going to the Mormon church. Just because he writes it off as a donantion to chairty doe not make it so. He is giving millions of dollars per year to help promote a cult of whackadoos....and you want him to be president? Y'all are an embarrassment to thinking humans everywhere. The fact that he can get any support at all is pretty good evidence of the dumbing down of America...or was that Amercia?
reply
BillyBonebrake replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
@dragontats- Look up LDS Humanitarian Services sometime. Regardless of how much you (obviously) hate Mormons, the LDS charity system is a benchmark charity supporting the needy regardlesss of nationality or religion.

You must be one of those "tolerant, non-judgemental" liberals, right?
Scroll Left Scroll Right