A slow death for No Child Left Behind?
Ten other states and the District of Columbia have also requested waivers; their applications are currently under review. Just 14 states have not sought waivers from the law, and they are eligible to do so in the future.
In a press release announcing the latest waivers, the Department of Education made clear the Obama administration's dim view of the law. The Department said that NCLB's "rigid, top-down prescriptions for reform, while well-intentioned, proved burdensome for many states."
No Child Left Behind, which was signed into law in 2002 by President George W. Bush, was designed to provide greater accountability in schools when it comes to student achievement. Its most controversial provision was requirements for annual testing of elementary, middle, and high school students in reading, math and science. States were required to make every student "proficient" in reading and math by the 2013-2014 school year. The law also mandated that schools get annual "report cards" of their progress.
Critics said the law led to a misguided focus on "teaching to the test" and deemed the requirement that all students be proficient by the 2013-2014 school year unrealistic. The also noted that nearly half of schools in the country were being branded as failures under the law for not meeting targets for achievement on standardized tests.
In exchange for the waivers, states must put in place new plans to prepare students for college and their careers and focus on progress for low-income students, among other requirements.
President Obama announced last September that Washington would begin granting the waivers, the first of which were granted in February. The Obama administration has portrayed its decision to grant the waivers as a reaction to a lack of action by Congress, which has failed to reauthorize the law despite its coming up for reauthorization in 2007. While Democrats and Republicans largely agree the law needs to be changed, they differ on how to do so. Republicans have criticized the administration for using the waivers to push its education agenda.
Education Secretary Arne Duncan said the administration's action was a necessary stopgap measure until the law is reauthorized.
"It is a remarkable milestone that in only five months, more than half of the states in the country have adopted state-developed, next-generation education reforms to improve student learning and classroom instruction, while ensuring that resources are targeted to the students that need them most," he said. "A strong, bipartisan reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act remains the best path forward in education reform, but as 26 states have now demonstrated, our kids can't wait any longer for Congress to act."
As the New York Times points out, states that have been granted waivers are still required to tie evaluations of teachers and schools in part to student performance on standardized tests. Joshua Starr, superintendent of the Montgomery County schools in Maryland, told the Times that the administration's action thus ultimately amounts to "moving around the chairs on the Titanic." Starr said he would prefer a focus on helping students learn in ways that can't be measured on standardized tests.
Popular in Politics
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington 171 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 349 Comments
- IRS targeting overlooked biggest soft money groups 66 Comments
- For GOP, scandals could be an electoral plus - or minus 327 Comments
- Republicans use IRS scandal to tar Obamacare 36 Comments
- Ousted IRS chief: "I did not mislead" the American people
- Why Obama should worry that current scandals might impact 2016
- Immigration deal reached in House














That being said, some students are never going to be skilled critical thinkers regardless of school (and in some cases, parental) teaching, and schools should not be penalized for being unlucky enough to have a lot of this sort of student. Like most laws, most of its problems lies in its rigidity.
- transporting kids
- feeding kids
- making sure kids feel good about themselves (everything has to be politically correct and all kids have to win everything)
- keeping the kids out of the parent's hair for a few hours a day (or as one commenter on another site said - "breeding couples")
- writing a different curriculum for every student because they are all "special" now (no such thing as a "normal" kid anymore)
- social engineering, nobody is different - this seems to conflict with all the kids being special
- constantly increasing taxes and less educated kids
In my opinion the schools are as bad as they are because of teachers. Yes, there are some good ones but they bear equal responsibility because they ignore the fact that most of their counter parts range from just average to terrible.
It became a "teaching for the test" exercise rather than bringing up the education system to a consistently high level.
This shows what happens when a good idea gets high jacked for political gain. Privatizing public education would be a gold mine for the greed mongers, but it would take us to a fast food level of education.