Romney: Obama has made it harder to get permanent immigration solution
"I believe the status of young people who come here through no fault of their own is an important matter to be considered and should be solved on a long term basis so they know what their future would be in this country," Romney said after an ice cream social on the first day of a five-day, six-state bus tour. "I think the action the president took today makes it more difficult to reach that long-term solution because an executive order is of course just a short term matter. It can be reversed by subsequent presidents." He was asked if he would overturn the order if he's elected, but he did not answer the question.
Romney's sentiments echoed those expressed Friday by a number of Republicans, including Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who has proposed a law similar to what Obama put in place by executive order; Arizona Sen. John McCain, who once led a drive for comprehensive bipartisan reform dealing with all undocumented immigrants, and Ohio Sen. Rob Portman, who told CBS and National Journal at an appearance in North Carolina, "I wish the president would work with us in Congress."
Romney said that "I happen to agree with Marco Rubio" that we need a long-term solution that provides "certain and clarity to the people who come into this country through no fault of their own by virtue of the action of their parents." However, he has not embraced Rubio's particular solution, which is similar to what Obama is doing via executive order.
Rubio may not introduce his immigration legislation after Obama's announcement
Will Obama's immigration decision be a game-changer in November?
Reporter interrupts Obama during immigration statement
In a taped television interview with WMUR in Manchester, Romney said it is unfortunate that immigration came up now and that Obama should have dealt with it years ago, according to a tweet from an assignment editor at the station.
Romney doesn't oppose executive orders in general. He has said he would issue one on his first day in office giving all 50 states waivers from the Affordable Care Act, should the Supreme Court uphold it.
Rebecca Kaplan contributed to this report.
Popular in Politics
- Obama prom pictures surface
- Drones, Gitmo part of broad Obama counterterrorism speech
- IRS' Lerner: "I have not done anything wrong" 689 Comments
- House passes GOP bill to speed Keystone XL pipeline approval
- Christie: Keep politics out of Oklahoma disaster relief
- Amid scrutiny of commerce pick, White House confident about her fate
- Former Miss America might challenge McConnell
- Obama to view Oklahoma tornado damage Sunday














His lack in doing so does not make him an effective or convincing leader.
He's hiding.
Especially when his comrades McCain and Reagan both have supported amnesty. Lest you forget:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jan/14/sen-mccain-and-illegal-immigration/
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128303672
Best immigration solution is to allow anyone from Mexico and Canada to come here, no visa necessary. 99% of our immigration 'problem' solved.
The net effect of what you propose would be no different than the status quo, as reflected by:
http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/hiring-illegal-immigrants.html
(Summary: Companies that utilize people here illegally then lower wages on those here legally, which in turn extends the recession since we have less money to spend. Economics 101. More demand for a supply of jobs that doesn't exist, meaning wages go down because demand is so plentiful... actually, if jobs were valued and there were so few, one would think their value would go up, but if everybody can do the work one needn't assign value to it... isn't it nice to know that your time and life are valued so little by those who take the most in welfare (corporations, since they get total bailouts at our expense too...))
I wonder how long it would take Mitt to take the call, in the middle of the night, that some country was attacking the United States?
By the way President Obama was forced to make that decision after the Republican House refused to act on the Immigration Bill, for over two years.
Meanwhile, all Obama and DHS are doing is what EVERY administration inevitably does: setting PRIORITIES.
Who should be at the TOP of the list for deportation? I think folks who've been convicted of felonies or serious misdemeanors are pretty good candidates. Does anyone on this thread disagree?
Who should be at the BOTTOM of the list for deportation? I think people between 16 and 30 who were brought here as infants or toddlers or kids (and often don't even know the language of the country they came from), who've graduated from high school and/or college and/or served in the military, and who HAVEN'T been convicted of a felony or serious misdemeanor are pretty good candidates. Does anyone on this thread disagree?
I support the DREAM Act, which would give those young people a path to citizenship. But the Republicans (not the Democrats, Juliatime; remember the filibuster rule!) refused to pass that, because it might have helped Obama. So the ONLY part of what Obama and DHS did that isn't a simple matter of setting priorities is allowing those young people to qualify for work permits. And that's a good thing, which allows our society to benefit from their contributions.
I need to know more about the DREAM act, which I thought had to do with getting people back to college since Obama is on record saying we need more college educated here for the tech field (amongst others) but until the jobs that pay enough that allow student loans to be repaid in a fair manner (never mind jobs that allow people to use their learned skills and build on them before 'skill rot' sets in), and I've posted a dozen or so links on this issue and its direct tangents alone in the past...
Which means Obama needs the help of Congress and the private industry. Private colleges seem more keen on inflating grades and giving other excuses to private companies to make excuses as to why they offshore jobs (few of which I believe anymore since the one the mass media never correlates speaks for itself)...
Everything is so out of hand that Obama really needs to put his foot down. The working class, consumers, etc, are being shafted from both ends...
This is his desperate act to get sympathy votes--both legal as well
as illegal.
http://wp.me/p28mLX-ir
Bingo.
Rubio was planning on offering some immigration reform bill discussed during the election cycle.......but of course it doesn't have widespread Republicansupportand would not have passed. SO the intention is just to soften the view of the Republican Party with Hispanic voters. All the President has done is beat Rubio to that discussion. You can see that Romney wants to excoriate Obama for this, but is trapped trying not to alienate someone. So now it's a separation of Powers issue.
The order is a move in the right direction on policy, however. I just don't know if America will ever be enlightended enough to legislate something similar.
Others try to look at the whole when possible, and someone had:
http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/hiring-illegal-immigrants.html
(Summary: Companies that utilize people here illegally then lower wages on those here legally, which in turn extends the recession since we have less money to spend. Economics 101.)
"I'm not concerned about polls," the candidate responded to one reporter's question. "In truth, I'm not concerned about my wealthy backers, the so-called 'little guy' or even the voters themselves. My only concern is for the will of God and the fulfillment of that destiny."