Florida judge blocks parts of "onerous" voter registration law
AP Photo
(CBS News) A Federal District judge in Florida placed a preliminary injunction on new Florida voter registration requirements on third-party organizations, calling parts of the law "onerous."
Judge Robert Hinkle said the law imposes "a harsh and impractical" metric for voter registration organizations, referring to record-keeping requirements and a 48-hour deadline to turn registrations in to the state. Failing to adhere to the "prompt" deadline could result in fines for organization.
The suit was brought by three third-party voter registration organizations: League of Women Voters of Florida, the Florida Public Interest Research Group and Rock the Vote.
Hinkle wrote in his 27-page order that the deadline makes voter registration efforts "risky business."
"If the goal is to discourage voter-registration drives and thus also to make it harder for new voters to register, the 48-hour deadline may succeed," Hinkle wrote.
Hinkle also blocked the part of the law that requires the voter registration organization submit the identification of its workers or employees signing people up to vote or handing out voter information pamphlets.
The new law was passed by Florida's Republican legislature and signed into law by Governor Rick Scott, who was elected in 2010. It is one of a wave of new laws passed in the past two years aimed at curtailing voter fraud.
According to The Palm Beach Post, Scott said he is "pleased that central parts of the voter registration law have been upheld by a federal judge," but he hasn't made a decision on how to move forward with the parts of the law struck down.
Groups working on increasing voter registration applauded the decision.
"Today's decision makes clear that laws that make it harder to participate in the political process should be rejected," said Wendy Weiser, director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center, which represented the voter registration organizations in the case.
Scott is also being challenged on efforts to purge Florida's voting rolls of non-citizens. Civil Rights groups say it violates the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits removing voters from the rolls 90 days before an election. Florida holds an election in August.
Popular in Politics
- For GOP, scandals could be an electoral plus - or minus 184 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 304 Comments
- IRS targeting overlooked biggest soft money groups
- Where is the Benghazi cover-up Republicans promised? 382 Comments
- Republicans use IRS scandal to tar Obamacare
- Ousted IRS chief: "I did not mislead" the American people 259 Comments
- FBI seeks anonymous source behind Menendez allegations
- Why Obama should worry that current scandals might impact 2016 226 Comments














ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO VOLATE--voters rights to privacy..
The re-THUG-li-cans..attempting to turn back the hands of history.. if for some reason..6 months OUT before the election..this law was implemented? WHY NOW? The reason is obvious..as a deterrent to discourage those voters who may be questionable> NOT to vote.
SHAME ON FLORIDA!!!.. the re-THUG-li-CONS..are playing the SAME HAND BOOK.. PLAYED in Florida-- when Gov. Bush and Senator Gore ran for the presidency ..which was voter intimidation & voter fraud accusations- at Florida voting polls as a deterrent to "said" Florida voters..
The Tea Party does not like the idea of the country being a democracy. In every discussion with the Tea Party I hear endless argument that the United States is not intended to be a democracy but a republic and the elected representatives should be elected by a small group of elites. The Tea Party supports returning the selection of U.S. Senators to the politicians of each state,with no popular vote allowed.
In any event, thanks to the Tea Party majority on the Supreme Court the importance of the individual vote is becoming ever more marginalized. The Supreme Court has ratified corruption in our government by removing all controls on money flowing to elected officials. The Court effectively said an individual can buy as many politicians as his, her or its money permits. With the demise of labor unions the only individuals with the money to buy politicians are corporations and the very wealthy.
So, in their battle against the non-wealthy the wealthy have already won the country. Bad news for the non-wealthy but the politicians don't care about the non-wealthy because the non-wealthy cannot provide the kind of money the wealthy can.
Within 20 years we will see the population of the United States consisting of a 1% wealthy class, 30% middle class and 69% poverty class. That is because we have exported our economic base to foreign countries and are doing nothing to replace it. As a nation we no longer support domestic innovation, preferring instead to utilize foreign educated engineers.
However, today's demographics put the Republican party at an increasing disadvantage. The only two ways they have to overcome that disadvantage (apart, of course, from offering candidates and platforms that appeal to more voters!) is to try to buy the elections state by state (and as we know they have the bucks to do just that), and to try very hard to eliminate the Democrats' advantage by nullifying Democratic voters.
They are doing both. The greatest service we could do for our country at this point is make sure the media continue to give both vote suppression and the vote-buying plenty of air-time and column-space.
What we need to do is demand, over and over again and in the media, for proof of illegal voting -- enough proof to make it sensible to prune the voter lists... legally. And we need to emphasize the extent to which Republicans depend on cheating and money to get elected. Because it's true. The party of the right are dependent, now, on blocking votes and on money from unscrupulous members of the financial elite, from the guys who brought us derivatives, from predatory lenders, and from the notorious US Chamber of Commerce.
At some point America is required to protect themselves against interests that will stoop to voting fraud. It has been well documented for the last 200 years that there are many ways to stuff the ballot. We need to be smart and legal about this, but it should happen.
The sooner the better!