Political Hotsheet
By

Sarah Huisenga /

CBS News/ May 29, 2012, 1:37 PM

Romney says Obama policies have hurt coal-dependent areas

 Mitt Romney addresses the Latino Coalition's 2012 AP Photo/Mary Altaffer

UPDATED 2:55 p.m. ET

(CBS News) CRAIG, Colo. -- Appearing in Colorado's coal country, Mitt Romney on Tuesday sought to make the case that President Obama's energy policies have hurt communities like these - in the face of evidence indicating otherwise.

The former Massachusetts governor, who is expected to formally clinch the GOP nomination in Texas' primary later Tuesday, told a crowd of more than 800 people that Obama's policies have been responsible for the problems in Craig, located in the state's rural northwest corner.

"I'm not going to forget communities like this across the country that are hurting right now under this president," Romney said. "I'm not going to forget middle-class families that are asking themselves why is it that three and a half years after this president got elected, we're still in a tough economy like this."

In fact, Craig's recent economic situation has been largely positive, said the town's mayor, Terry Carwile. "Nobody's been laying people off or anything like that," said Carwile, a retired coal miner. "As a matter a fact, they've been hiring."

Coal production in Colorado and Utah rose 25 percent in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the same period a year earlier, according to a November 2011 Denver Post article.

The political website ColoradoPols.com also indicated that the problems Craig and other coal-producing communities have suffered are due to state and not federal issues. It said the biggest perceived threat to Craig's coal production is not Environmental Protection Agency regulations, but a bipartisan law signed in 2010 that aims to convert some of Colorado coal energy production to natural gas by 2017.

The Obama campaign chimed in with a series of statistics that it said refute Romney's arguments.

"Domestic oil production is at an 8-year high, our dependence on foreign oil is at a 16-year low, renewable energy production has nearly doubled, and natural gas production has increased every year under President Obama to an all-time high," spokeswoman Lis Smith said. "And under President Obama's leadership, investments in the clean energy sector have supported more than 200,000 jobs, employment in coal mining has reached a 15-year high, and the oil and gas industry has added tens of thousands of jobs."

In apparent anticipation of such criticism, Romney said that Obama can't take credit for any recent economic improvements.

"His campaign these days is trying to find a twig to hang on to, some little excuse they can grab and say, 'Look, things are getting a little better, aren't they?'' he said. "And the answer is yeah, things are getting a little better in a lot of places in this country, but it's not thanks to his policies. It's in spite of his policies. You see, every recession ultimately comes to an end, but you'd expect that this deep recession might come back to an aggressive turnaround, but it didn't happen."

Romney appeared in Craig at the invitation of motel owner Frank Moe, who reportedly sent Romney a video produced by a group called Energy for America. The video, "The Perfect Storm Over Craig, Colorado," highlights the community's economic dependence on the energy industry.

Introducing Romney at the event, Moe said that when he "cried out for help and relief from Obama's overregulation of the energy industry and his failed economic policies that are hurting out community, Mitt Romney is the one who answered the call."

Energy for America is a joint project of Americans for Prosperity, the American Energy Alliance, and the Institute for Energy Research. Americans for Prosperity is among the political groups that has received funding from wealthy conservative brothers David and Charles Koch.

In an interview with Colorado radio station KRAI, Romney elaborated on his energy-related plans if he's elected. He said energy industries deserve credit for proactively taking steps to reduce pollution and other problems.

"Our extracting industries have become so effective in remediating lands after they have been mined for coal, for instance, as well as making sure that we're not polluting the air," he said. "We really don't have to say to ourselves that we can't afford to have oil coal and gas as part of our energy mix."

Romney has criticized Democratic efforts to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from coal plants and other sources through a cap-and-trade program. He indicated that other countries need to do more to regulate greenhouse gases without the United States being forced to take the lead.

"I know there are some who are very concerned about carbon dioxide emissions, so-called greenhouse gases, and they feel that these sources are going to be contributing to global warming," he said.

"But you know, they call it global warming, not America warming, and the idea of America unilaterally saying we're not going to take advantage of these abundant energy resources, it would put us in at an enormous economic disadvantage relative to other countries," he added.

Matthew Shelley contributed.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
48 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lucky12345678 says:
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."- Winston Churchill
Governments redistribute wealth among its citizens. Sometimes they spend it on roads, but the actual work is done by private companies. Sometimes they nationalize private companies to extract their wealth and then find other private companies to do the actual work. And other times they control airlines, but again have private firms run the company. Matters not, governments simply extract money from its citizens and when that's not enough have the central bank print it...
I'd vote for "cool" and "funny" anytime! Why elect a boring president who just spends his time talking with other members of the Federal government to resolve legislative issues? We really need four more years of the "big stick" and "slow jamming"... Does that mean the president makes homemade jelly, just somewhat confused by that term, but hey I'll vote for him anyway!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
euge005 says:
I wish Obama was doing what he could to eliminate thew coal industry. It is the 1800's fuel of choice, dirty, out dated and non-renewable. Time to stop sending men and their sons to die underground. Time to stop supporting coal with the bogus clean coal subsidies and make them pay the costs of their pollution with the carbon tax. Watch the lies from this group on TV nightly that pretends the economy depends on them. They intentionally confuse coal with jobs and industry, when both can be obtained for a sustainable future that does not poison tyhe air or water. No turning back the clock, end the pollution and support Obama.
reply
sjc_1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
We will continue to use coal, but in cleaner ways like IGCC as soon as we mandate it. Companies will choose the cheapest and most profitable way, as long as they do not have to pay the health bills associated with their expediency.
Lucky12345678 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
and I wish upon a star!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Nocults says:
NEWS FLASH!!!!!!!!!!!

Romney says Obama's policies have hurt Amish buggy whip manufacturers.

Film at 11:00 on Faux Nooz.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
feralferal says:
Last weekend during the mid-day hours, Germany was getting half its electricity from solar power -- the equivalent of 20 nuclear reactors' worth.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/international-news/european/germany-sets-solar-power-record-institute-says/article2445414/

But keep chanting that alternatives aren't feasible -- the coal companies like that tune, and the Koch's will supply the lyrics.
reply
slownewsday_6000 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Anything which changes our dependence on fossil fuels will endanger the reasons for occupying the Middle East.

The military-industrial complex simply won't stand for that...
sjc_1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Thorium Power Inc. has a way to retro fit exiting nuclear plants to use thorium, which is much safer and can use material from spent fuel rods already sitting at reactor sites. The waste product is less radioactive for a much shorter period of time than present reactors.
See all 6 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sjc_1 says:
Mitt would like to win Pennsylvania and Ohio, he will have to do a lot more than this to do it. We still mine plenty of coal and power plants will continue to use it.

Natural gas combined cycle are much cleaner and more efficient, but Rick Perry in Texas wants to build 12 more old style coal fired power plants. Must be some money in there for someone to be so dead set on that.
reply
nygurl1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No brains involved. Rikki gets the dough, the people get the shaft. Same as always.
Nocults replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Why hasn't the Bishop been pimping for natural gas???????

April 9, 2012
So much natural gas is being produced that soon there may be nowhere left to put the country's swelling surplus. After years of explosive growth, natural gas producers are retrenching.
The underground salt caverns, depleted oil fields and aquifers that store natural gas are rapidly filling up after a balmy winter depressed demand for home heating.
The glut has benefited businesses and homeowners that use natural gas. But with natural gas prices at a 10-year low — and falling — companies that produce the fuel are becoming victims of their drilling successes. Their stock prices are falling in anticipation of declining profits and scaled-back growth plans.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
slownewsday_6000 says:
Coal is outdated and terrible for the environment.

Our electrical grid should be run on nuclear plants powered by thorium.
reply
sjc_1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Thorium is the way to go, but the usual suspects profiting from no change will work against it.

The health care bill for coal fired power plants is estimated to be $100 billion per year in the U.S. This is a cost that is not levied on the coal industry.
nygurl1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
There ARE ways to make the coal safer.
They just can't be bothered!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BuckeyeChuck says:
If it wasn't for lies the whole republican party would be mute.
reply
slownewsday_6000 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
In 2008, Obama said under his administration that the coal industry would go BANKRUPT.
---
I don't see any problem with that, other than that he didn't keep his promise.
retm-w replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Barry

The coal industry will go bankrupt because the coal users don't want to pay for enviromental equipment(Scrubbers) they claim are to costly to maintain. It takes manpower(Jobs)to maintain them, and these companies sure don't want hire anyone.
See all 5 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cubscout09 says:
Believe in the Bull - Mitt Romney's Plan for Cowpie Creation in America
reply
nygurl1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rain - what have you been drinking, smoking chewing???
Yes he is historic! He is historic for accomplishing what he did in spite of the reps who said no, no, no to EVERYTHING!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
werntrouble says:
Romney is totally out of touch. I'm feel sorry for the Republican Party having to nominate him. He's not a viable president - way out of date and not at all creative or appealing.
reply
Lindag20 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
by rainontehm May 29, 2012 8:08 PM EDT
As opposed to the first president to declare war on his own people the cow pie Obama?
--------------
Are you some sort of Fox/Rush parrot? Oh I get it, you just HATE Obama for whatever reason.
nygurl1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Rain - go shoot yourself! You are stupid, bigoted and need to be put down!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Raptorsmasher says:
If more safety regulation means less profits and less deaths, so be it!
reply
See all 48 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right