Native American issue continues to dog Warren
Elizabeth Warren
/ Chuck BurtonUpdated: 4:28 p.m. ET
(CBS News) Nearly a month after questions were first raised surrounding Elizabeth Warren's past claims to Native American lineage, the Democratic Massachusetts Senate candidate continues to be dogged by a debate over whether or not she improperly identified as Native American in order to further her professional career.
Despite attempts by the Warren campaign to downplay the controversy, a new report Friday by the Boston Globe calls into question the veracity of Warren's recent claim that she had been unaware Harvard Law School touted her as a Native American employee during her tenure there.
"I think I read it on the front page of the Herald," Warren said in late April, when asked about Harvard's having promoted her purported minority status.
According to the Globe, Harvard reported for six years during Warren's tenure at the school that a Native American woman was among its senior law professors. "According to both Harvard officials and federal guidelines, those statistics are almost always based on the way employees describe themselves," writes the Globe's Mary Carmichael.
The story also alleges that Warren fails to meet both federal and school-wide standards that would qualify her to formally list herself as a Native American.
Generally speaking, the federal government does not officially recognize a person as an American Indian unless he or she has had status conferred upon them by one of 566 federally recognized tribes. A Certificate Degree of Indian Blood (CDIB) can also be obtained to prove that a person has Native American blood, though it does not confer tribal status.
According to the Globe, Harvard characterized a Native American as "a person having origins in any of the original peoples of North America and who maintains cultural identification through tribal affiliation or community recognition.''
"I am proud of my family and I am proud of my heritage," Warren told reporters on Thursday, according to MassLive.com, after being questioned repeatedly on the issue.
When asked how she knew she had a Native American background, Warren cited family lore.
"Because my mother told me so. This is how I live. My mother, my grandmother, my family. This is my family. Scott Brown has launched attacks on my family. I am not backing off from my family," she said.
Warren has also spoken of "the stories that my grandparents told me that my grandparents told my parents and my parents told my brothers and me," with regard to her heritage, and has cited a photo of her grandfather, who she said "had high cheek bones like all of the Indians do."
But despite having listed herself as a Native American in a directory of law professors for several years between the 1980s and 1990s, Warren has failed to produce evidence substantiating her Native American lineage.
Brown, the incumbent Republican senator, said in a statement Friday that he was "offended" by the accusation that he had attacked Warren's family "when I have done nothing of the kind."
"To make that kind of wild and baseless charge is disturbing," he said. "This Native American controversy is a problem of Elizabeth Warren's own making. She falsely described herself as a minority and some of the schools where she worked relied on that information to misrepresent the diversity of their faculty."
Brown called on Harvard to "correct the record" regarding Warren's heritage.
"The Boston Globe today has a story that states that Harvard may have violated federal guidelines in the reporting of diversity information because of what Elizabeth Warren told them. I call on Harvard President Faust to immediately correct the record with the relevant federal agencies and uphold Harvard's 400-year-old tradition of abiding by the truth," the statement said.
In an e-mailed statement to Hotsheet, Warren spokesperson Alethea Harney argued that Warren has already "answered countless questions" about her heritage and that "it's time to focus on the important issues."
"Over the past month Elizabeth has answered countless questions openly while the people who recruited her have made it clear it was because of her extraordinary skill as a teacher and a groundbreaking scholar," Harney said. "She is proud of her family and her heritage, and it is something that her family talked about often when she was growing up."
Harney added: "The fact that Elizabeth noted her heritage in a professional publication has been made public and addressed by Elizabeth on multiple occasions. It's time to focus on the important issues facing Massachusetts. Republican Senator Scott Brown is trying to distract people from his record voting for Wall Street, big oil and big increases in student loans. There are real issues middle class families are dealing with every day and that's where Elizabeth is focused."
Despite the ongoing controversy, a recent Suffolk University/7NEWS poll shows the Democratic candidate locked in a neck-and-neck race with Brown.
Popular in Politics
- Michelle Obama decries "slander" that educated blacks are "trying to act white" Play Video
- Both parties vow to "get to the bottom" of IRS scandal 86 Comments
- Benghazi-disciplined diplomat a prolific poet
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington 244 Comments
- Republicans continue beating Benghazi drum 186 Comments
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK
- Adviser on White House scandals: "Partisan fishing expeditions" won't distract Obama 193 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
This issue illustrates why we should eliminate racial preferences altogether. They may have made sense at one point, but we've thankfully moved beyond that point. Instead of helping, they now only serve to cast doubt on the legitimate, unaided success of many minorities. In todays society, any preferences should be based on socio-economic factors, not race.
But nearl451 is absolutely right: this entire issue is about as dumb a waste of time as I can remember in any race. Massachusetts has two major candidates. Look at their records; see what they say they want to do in the Senate; choose the one you prefer.
My choice would be easy: Elizabeth Warren!
If the Mass. electorate thinks that whether or not Warren is Cherokee or got some advantage from it is what the election is about, then they deserve whatever they get.
The discussion should be about (of course) who will best represent the interests of Massachusets. Nothing else. Look at the views and acheivements of Brown and Warren and choose.
Come on Molly. Really?
What's the clincher? After years of never being invited to a free lunch by people like herself, she never considered that she should organize a Native American Student Association to sponsor such a lunch.
She's just too sleazy for politics.
There are people ( believe it or not, you right wing nut-jobs ), that are proud to have Native American ancestors....it seems a lot of people posting here think that that's something to be ashamed of.
and i see that most comments are choosing
to make fun of this subject .
so many Americans can not trace their ancestry .
because in order to survive , ... their ancestors
had to hide their true identity .
even as late as world war II , many states had laws
to prevent Indians [ native Americans ] from owning land .
or voting or ever holding public office .
and because of these restrictive laws , most mixed blood
Americans were forced to change their names .
and hide their ethnic identity .
so you will find very few court house records that list an
American as a Cherokee ?
if you wanted to own and keep your land , you had better
pass for white !!
so my family , like millions of others can not show documents .
but our history has been passed down .
in the 1800's one of my great-grandfathers at the age of 52
lost his wife in child birth .
there were no stay at home dads back then .
so he purchased a wife , remember you could buy people then ?
he purchased a 14 year old Cherokee squaw .
she gave him more children , one being my grandmother .
i have no papers to document this .
just don't call my grandmother a liar !!
Personally, I think Warren should take a DNA test. I know it may sound degrading to her heritage, that she should have to stoop to such levels to prove her family history. But it's essential this issue be put to rest. Because if by chance, Warren has no Native ancestry, she brings to light an ip