Obama camp doubles down on Bain attacks
The video, which runs nearly six minutes in length, focuses on a Bain-owned company, Ampad, which bought SCM, an office supply production plant in 1994. The video uses local news reports and SCM workers to tell a story of slashed jobs, reduced wages, and cut pensions after Bain took over.
"I understand if you gotta cut back, [conduct] layoffs, that's part of the business, but you don't come in and take everything everybody's got and destroy a business. That's what they did," former SCM worker Jerry Rayburn said in the video.
Ampad filed for bankruptcy in 2000 after Bain made $100 million dollars, the ad charges.
The Obama campaign's ad on private equity firm Bain Capital, which Mitt Romney co-founded in 1984 and led until he left to run the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympics, is a continuation of attacks the campaign began in earnest last week, where they highlighted GST Steel, a company that saw layoffs after Bain acquired it.
Romney used an interview with a conservative website to respond to the Obama campaign, saying that he had already left to run the Olympics when Bain acquired GST Steel.
The Obama campaign is attempting to discredit Romney's economic credentials as the Republican candidate tries to paint himself as better prepared to deal with a struggling economy than President Obama.
Speaking about Ampad in Ohio last week, Vice President Joe Biden said, "Laying on debt, laying off workers, doing what is good for those at top while everyone else fends for themselves? We can't afford that in the nation."
The Obama campaign has received some pushback on his focus on Bain, even from some in his own party. On NBC's "Meet the Press" Sunday, Newark Mayor Cory Booker said the attacks on Bain Capital show that "we're getting to a ridiculous point in America."
The Romney campaign referenced Booker's remarks in its response to the new Obama video.
"President Obama continues his assault on the free enterprise system with attacks that one of his supporters, Newark Mayor Cory Booker, called 'nauseating' and a former adviser, Steven Rattner, called 'unfair,'" Romney campaign spokesperson Andrea Saul said in a statement. "Americans expected a different kind of politics from Barack Obama but, sadly, this is just more of the same failed politics that dominates Washington."
Popular in Politics
- FBI director acknowledges domestic drone use 148 Comments
- Obama and Berlin: Faded echoes meet new realities
- Obama on NSA programs: Americans "not getting the complete story" 259 Comments
- Immigration reform would cut deficit, analysis shows 82 Comments
- Next up for Obama: Major effort on climate change
- House Republicans pass 20-week limit on abortions 596 Comments
- Smooth, on-time Obamacare rollout no sure thing: GAO
- IRS readying to pay $70M in employee bonuses, senator says













Maybe Romney and Obama can make a deal (to include all those out side groups) to not attack the other and instead talk about what they do do to solve the nation's problems and what they did in the past that would demonstrate thy had the ability to do so again. But you know that's just not going to happen. These people thrive on the mud they sling and are fearful of having to actually state what they would do and how those actions will affect (both positively and negatively) this nation.
Ironically what these two are doing is applying for a job, and we, the voters are the collective human resource department conducting the job interview. As the hiring manager I don't want you to tell me why I shouldn't hire the other guy. I want you to tell me what you will do for me and what previous expeiences you have that demsonstrate you can actually do it. The candidate that best does that will get my vote. Hopefully all my fellow hiring managers will conduct themselves the same.
Vote to complete the fascist takeover of the world by Wall Street and the Bankster criminals, vote for Mitler.
Again, I ask how many jobs has Romney created? Obama has put hundreds of thousands back to work without rescinding the tax cuts to people like Romney. He's brought the the unemployment rate down to levels not seen sice late 2007 or early 2008, years before he took office. Just imagine how much better off if those funds were used to pay down the deficit (caused by a fighting a two front war using borrowed money from China).
I would rather have Romney for President who maximizes profits than Obama who minimizes profits and maximizes expenses.
"No amount of political success on non-economic issues can compensate for failure in leadership on economic issues"
It was all a ruse. Because a business resume doesn't automatically make you good a running a system that's not geared to only worry about profits and minimizing expenses & headcount.
It's not going to change dem minds but it sure seems to be making a lot of reps switch sides!