The Tea Party's next big target: Texas
Republican Senate candidate Ted Cruz
/ www.tedcruz.orgIn the wake of Richard Mourdock's Tea Party-propelled victory over Richard Lugar in the Indiana Senate primary on Tuesday, the Tea Party is now shifting its focus to the next big battle on its agenda: The Texas primary on May 29.
That race features the man who Tea Partiers see as the potential breakout candidate of the 2012 cycle: Ted Cruz, the 41-year-old former Solicitor General competing in the crowded Republican Senate primary. Brendan Steinhauser, Director of Federal and State Campaigns for Tea Party-aligned group FreedomWorks, told Hotsheet last year that he sees Cruz as "the biggest Tea Party rock star in the class of 2012," and his organization has been working hard on his behalf.
Cruz - whose calls for auditing the Federal Reserve, eliminating the IRS and significantly reducing the size of government have brought him the support of Ron Paul - is seeking the seat held by retiring Republican Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison. His toughest competition appears to be the wealthy and well-known Texas Lieutenant governor, David Dewhurst. Which is why the Club for Growth PAC, which backed Mourdock and is backing Cruz, today announced it was spending $1 million on an ad characterizing Dewhurst as a moderate tax raiser. The spot doesn't mention Cruz, but encourages voters to "vote against Dewhurst on May 29th." (See at left.)
Cruz, whose father moved from Cuba to Texas at age 18, also has the support of the Tea Party Express. Many of his backers see him as the second coming of Marco Rubio, the Tea Party powered Florida senator being discussed as a possible running mate for Mitt Romney. If Cruz comes in second and can keep Dewhurst below 50 percent on May 29, there will be a runoff between the two men, giving Cruz more time to rally Tea Party support nationwide. (Dewhurst has been running attack ads against Cruz in an attempt to keep that from happening.)
With Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah looking likely to survive a Tea Party primary challenge, the Texas race offers the best opportunity beyond the Indiana race for the movement to assert its continued relevance in the face of perceptions that it has lost steam following the 2010 midterms.
FreedomWorks President Matt Kibbe argues that Mourdock's victory "will re-ignite the spark of the 2010 midterm elections and energize the movement across the nation" on behalf of Cruz and other candidates favored by the Tea Party movement. The Indiana results, he said, reflect "just one more example of the hostile takeover of the Republican Party that we've been working on since 2009."
If Cruz and Mourdock make it to the Senate, they will join five senators with clear Tea Party ties: Kentucky's Rand Paul, Utah's Mike Lee, Wisconsin's Ron Johnson, Kansas' Jerry Moran and South Carolina's Jim DeMint, who generally prefer the confrontational stance embraced by Mourdock to the more collegial posture favored by Lugar.
Popular in Politics
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington 264 Comments
- Adviser on White House scandals: "Partisan fishing expeditions" won't distract Obama 136 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 362 Comments
- Obama: Racism is no excuse for not excelling Play Video
- Where is the Benghazi cover-up Republicans promised? 422 Comments
- Republicans continue beating Benghazi drum
- IRS targeting overlooked biggest soft money groups 72 Comments
- For GOP, scandals could be an electoral plus - or minus 357 Comments














Maybe the whole southern tier? And no trading!
And who can forget Ted Nugent's rant about "chopping off their heads in November", or his colorful analogy of shooting a coyote for "pissing on your couch", or his best ones of all..."suck on my machine gun", and "we gotta kill the pig..." His little "tirade" got him investigated by the Secret Service.
Now we have a guy named Scott Boston, a Tea Partier saying, "We have to kill the Claire Bear...she's an evil monster...", referring to Missouri Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill, who's up for re-election. The authorities took these words so seriously, that they increased her security...they must know something these nut-jobs don't as yet understand.
At the very least, these fruitcakes should be charged with inciting violence, arrested, and forced to defend their psychopathic B.S. in a court of law. In a country where access to firearms is commonplace, and the heat of politics can so easily stir up insane reactions, why do we keep letting these idiots inspire this sort of madness ?
If the Republican party is indeed in the midst of a "hostile takeover" from the extreme right, the ONLY way they can preserve what's left of their rapidly diminishing credibility, is to renounce this lunatic fringe in no uncertain terms, and do everything in their collective power, ( what's left of it ), to discredit and destroy this movement of madness.
Before we have another tragedy....
Then they will blame it on everyone but themselves and the sheep will listen!
I haven't figured it all out yet. Do the mindless always become reps? Are they born that way or are they trained from birth?
If one starts thinking on their own are they eliminated or just torn to shreds with lies?
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-05-08/lugar-s-tea-party-loss-dims-republican-senate-prospects
=====
chevyhotrod: "You much be daydreaming....lol..Indiana is a solid Republican State"
=====
Hey chevette -- that line came straight from 'Business Week,' hardly a 'librul' publication, and just for you history-revisionist republicans, Obama won Indiana in 2008, and there were several teabagging extremists that lost even in 2010 running for the Senate!
by infantryman1968 May 10, 2012 11:18 AM EDT: "The Tea Party's next big target: Texas LOL!"
Looks like senility has hit the "infant.LOL!" very hard today, with identical posts two hours apart!
The absolute irony of the teabagging extremists and party purity!
LOL!
CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, NPR, and the W.H. Spokesman Robert Gibbs on the eve of the 2010 Midterms: "The Tea Party is irrelevent and will not make a difference in this election"
Since then, the TEA Party has chosen to fly below the radar like the Masons in order to avoid being crucified by "The Followers" and their Accomplices State Controlled Media. They have proclaimed them as "dead".
The general election in a presidential year is completely different!
=====
signseeker1717: "Ideological 'purity' is indeed a VERY dangerous concept, and is NOT the answer to our problems OR our future. Compromise is NOT a dirty word - in fact it is our national heritage; if the country's Founders had not been able to compromise, we wouldn't have a Constitution, and wouldn't even EXIST as a country."
=====
Sorry mr. teabagging extremist, but "signseeker" is absolutely correct, and you have no more of a chance of gaining a majority with your highly-partisan and far-right minority, than do far-left liberals in this highly-polarized country with changing demographics.
Isn't it ironic that those who cast themselves as the stoutest defenders of the Constitution and who promote the genius of the Founding Fathers are the same ones who can't accept that there is a Senate controlled by duly elected members of the other party, not to mention a House minority that opposes them? The Founders understood the political imperative and expressly designed a Congress that takes it all into account. To say that the opposition should roll over because Americans spoke clearly in the last election doesn't reckon for the fact that the Founders staggered elections for a purpose, and that voters have sent a Democrat to the White House and to the majority in the Senate in previous elections.