The Republican Party is more pragmatic than you might think
Presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney campaigning in Pennsylvania with Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who is aligned with the Tea Party.
(CBS News) Over the past few years, it has hardened into something approaching conventional wisdom that the conservative/Tea Party wing is in the process of taking over the GOP. But while the right has certainly asserted itself - particularly in the 2010 midterm elections, with mixed results - the reality is that the Republican Party is now in the process of nominating an establishment figure with a moderate reputation for president. Again.
And just like in 2008, when Sen. John McCain was the nominee, there has not been a significant conservative revolt to the pending nomination of Mitt Romney. Indeed, this week brought an endorsement for Romney from self-anointed Tea Party champion Michele Bachmann, as well as a semi-endorsement from Newt Gingrich, who spent the primary season thundering that Romney does not represent his party. Conservative journalists and commentators, meanwhile, held an off-the-record confab with Romney, and while he reportedly didn't win them over completely, they certainly don't seem to be in the process of mutiny.
This isn't to say there isn't still resistance to Romney. Rick Santorum has notably kept his former rival at arm's length since leaving the race; the conservative media, meanwhile, is certainly not covering the former Massachusetts governor uncritically. But the reality is that despite all the talk of unflinching Tea Partiers, the Republican Party, on a national level, remains pragmatic. The goal, quite simply, is to beat President Obama in November, even if that means accepting a nominee many see as flawed; it's no surprise that the candidate overwhelmingly identified in Republican primary exit polls as the most electable went on to become the nominee. As one attendee at the conservative media meeting told Buzzfeed: "It was facing reality -- what are we going to do? Everybody agrees with Romney that, policy-wise, Obama is a disaster and a threat."
That's why the talk you hear about Romney needing to solidify support among the conservative voters who supported Santorum and Gingrich in the primary is overblown. Mitt Romney is not going to lose the Deep South to Barack Obama; if it were the GOP nominee, a cardboard box could handily defeat the president in the reddest states. There is no groundswell for a conservative third-party candidate to take on Mr. Obama, because conservatives don't want to split the vote and hand the president reelection. There may be a lot of Republicans who see themselves as to the right of their presidential nominee, but it's pretty hard to find any who are seriously looking for an alternative.
It adds up to the fact that while the old guard has lost some control over the party - for proof look no further than Sens. Rand Paul and Mike Lee, along with a number of House freshmen - the old rules still apply, at least when it comes to the presidential race. (The cracks are showing, but they're on a district- and statewide level.) The establishment wanted the nominee it wanted, and the base is learning to live with him. For a party that some have suggested is being torn asunder by competing factions, that sure looks a lot like unity.
Popular in Politics
- Obama prom pictures surface 103 Comments
- Obama: America at a "crossroads" in fighting terrorism 104 Comments
- IRS official Lois Lerner placed on leave
- Protester heckles Obama during counterterrorism speech Play Video
- Rep. Jo Bonner to resign from House for university job
- Obama announces steps toward Guantanamo closure
- Obama: The war on terror, "like all wars, must end" Play Video
- Obama to tour Jersey Shore with Gov. Christie
Kinda sounds familiar ... like the last 3 years. Except now there is unemployment the highest since Carter in '81. Even some Democrats have noticed and understand the buck stops in this administration. Nice try blaming others tho. That is noticed too.
Flawed? How about VULTURE CAPITALIST! He likes Rand Paul's budget with tax cuts for the wealthy while privatizing Social Security and Medicare where they skim 15% off the top. But he could change?
Sandman writes: "Republicans run under the color of religion when in fact their own policies are contrary to more holy books than I can count."
I agree. Historically, GWB was a Yale Skull and Bones Satanist. Claimed to get Jesus? But as President he started TWO off the budget wars, etc.
Jesus said, "By their fruits ye shall know them." James said, "Show your faith by your works."
Etch-a-Sketch Romney has already shown that he cannot be trusted to run a steel mill without bankrupting it for his own profit and profit of his financiers, so how can he be trusted to run the nation when he owes so much to his SuperPacs.
-----------------
I think that is the thing that makes me the angriest about Republicans! HOW DARE THEY act like they are the "religious right" the "Christians", the "Moral majority"....when they are against healthcare, couldn't care less about the poor, want to start wars just so they can profit off of death - that is NOT the Christianity I read about!
Http://www.directory.dooas.com
OBAMA 2012 : )
Surely, he is the choice of the top 1% for president, and that translates into being like the wolf in the Little Red Riding Hood story, whereas "pragmatism" in 2012 requires a Mother Theresa-type candidate! Nikos Retsos, retired professor
Besides, there is no way Romney can beat President Obama. The only one who CAN beat Obama is Ron Paul. Hello people, get your head out of the sand and wake up to reality. America is going down, and Ron Paul is our last hope.
PRESIDENT RON PAUL 2012!!!!