Obama: No "excessive celebration" of bin Laden's death
President Barack Obama takes part in a joint news conference with Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda Monday, April 30, 2012, in the East Room of the White House in Washington.
/ APUpdated 4:29 p.m. Eastern Time
President Obama responded on Monday to criticism that he is engaged in a "despicable" "politicization" of the killing of Osama bin Laden, saying "I hardly think you've seen any excessive celebration taking place here."
"I think that people, the American people rightly remember what we as a country accomplished in bringing to justice somebody who killed over 3000 of our citizens," he said. "And it's a mark of the excellence of our intelligence teams and our military teams, a political process that worked. And I think for us to use that time for some reflection, to give thanks to those who participated, is entirely appropriate and that's what's been taking place."
Mr. Obama has come under fire from John McCain, Arianna Huffington and others for a video released on Friday in which former President Bill Clinton was shown lauding Mr. Obama for deciding to approve the mission to go after the terrorist leader.
"Which path would Mitt Romney have taken?" the ad asks, before pointing to an April 2007 comment from Romney in which he said of bin Laden, "It's not worth moving heaven and earth, spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person."
Speaking during a joint press conference with Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda, Mr. Obama said Monday afternoon that people should "take a look at people's previous statements in terms of whether they thought it was appropriate to go into Pakistan and take out bin Laden."
"I assume that people meant what they said when they said it," he continued. "That's been at least my practice. I said that I would go after bin Laden if we had a clear shot at him, and I did. If there are others who have said one thing and now suggest they would do something else, I'd go ahead and let them explain it."
Asked Monday if he would have authorized the mission Monday, Romney said, "of course."
"Even Jimmy Carter would have given that order," he added. Romney is set to mark bin Laden's death tomorrow in New York City, accompanied by former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani.
Mr. Obama has taped an interview to coincide with the one year anniversary of bin Laden's death which is set to air tomorrow. The interview, set in the White House Situation Room, is part of an effort to "present the definitive account of what took place leading-up to and during the tension-filled hours of the mission targeting Osama bin Laden," according to a release from NBC News.
As a candidate, Mr. Obama was mocked as naive by McCain and then-rival Hillary Clinton for stating that "If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and [then-Pakistani leader] President Musharraf will not act, we will."
In 2007, Romney said he does "not concur in the words of Barack Obama in a plan to enter an ally of ours...I don't think those kinds of comments help in this effort to draw more friends to our effort."
That same year, Romney was asked about "moving heaven and earth" to get bin Laden during a debate.
"We'll move everything to get him," he replied. "But I don't want to buy into the Democratic pitch that this is all about one person -- Osama bin Laden -- because after we get him, there's going to be another and another."
"It's more than Osama bin Laden. But he is going to pay, and he will die," Romney added.
Popular in Politics
- IRS' Lerner: "I have not done anything wrong" 456 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor
- Obama to view Oklahoma tornado damage Sunday
- Christie: Keep politics out of Oklahoma disaster relief
- Major immigration overhaul passes first big test
- Will tornado relief funding escape politics? 47 Comments
- Top IRS official to invoke 5th Amendment at congressional testimony 219 Comments
Agent-XXXX said, "... There were 17+ reasons for taking out Saddam. Nobody said they were resonsible for 9/11. They did harbor terrorist..and they were a threat to the region. And your bogus number includes the war in Afghanistan."
------
1. Bush failed to provide solid and compelling evidence Saddam was the danger to national security that he claimed to both congress and the American people. Essentially, Bush cooked the intelligence data and told congress, "Trust me, take my word for it, and sign the enabling legislation."
The wording and sense of that legislation actually reads like a plea for peaceful diplomacy. Yet, before the ink on the document was dry, Bush began to use its final, military option to the exclusion of all others-- his UN performance, notwithstanding. Bush turned the intent of the authority (to apply increased peaceful pressure on Saddam, chiefly through multilateral diplomacy) on its head, and rushed to invasion.
David Kay, the chief Bush arms inspector to enter Iraq after invasion, was unable to find any evidence to support the Bush administration claim Saddam had stockpiled weapons of mass destruction. Kay resigned in early 2004 after stating he doubted any stockpile ever would be found.
2. Contrary to the claim none said Saddam was responsible for 911, Cheney and his gang insisted to their bitter end that Saddam harbored al Qaeda, provided them training and facilities, and met abroad with an al Qaeda representative. No evidence was found to corroborate any of these Bush and Cheney claims.
To spin the Iraq allusion further, in a 2005 speech about Iraq, Bush commented, "No one asked for this war..." as though in reference to 911-- a conflict clearly imposed on the United States. But in fact, Iraq was not imposed on anybody. Iraq was Bush's War, a war driven by wealthy oil and gas backers who lusted about untapped oceans of crude in Iraq. Said Alan Greenspan in his memoir, "The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World", "Iraq was largely about oil..."
3. The figure of 4,486 Americans deaths in Iraq since March 19, 2003, is obtained from DOD, of which 3532 is combat fatalities. Surprisingly, the US military is terrible about tracking statistics on American wounded, and the estimate of actual wounded is as much as three times higher than the official figure.
Like 29 times in his speech at the war criminal's 2004 Republicon Convention in NYC. Just one speech.
Nothing like the GOP being against politicizing an issue. Not to mention that we've been kicking terrorist butt a lot better than under Bush's rule.