Romney advice to students: Take a risk to start a business
AP Photo/Jae C. Hong
Updated 8:15 p.m. ET
WESTERVILLE, Ohio -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney offered a group of college students this advice on Friday: If you want to start a business, borrow money from your parents.
Romney, a wealthy former investment banker who has struggled to soften his image as a member of America's super elite, was discussing ways of achieving the American dream at Otterbein University. He said, "We've always encouraged young people: Take a shot, go for it. Take a risk. Get the education. Borrow money if you have to from your parents. Start a business."
The presumptive GOP nominee focused his remarks to students in this important swing state on trying to show a more personal side. He talked at length about his work at Bain Capital on investment projects that fostered the creation of the Staples office-supply chain and other businesses. He also mentioned political supporter Jimmy John Liautaud, founder of the pizza business that bears his name, as an example of the American dream.
"He graduated from high school and he didn't want to go to college," Romney said. "And he said to his dad, 'Can I borrow some money? I want to start a business.' His dad said, 'You know what? I just don't think you've got the discipline to start a business and make it work.' And he said, 'I'll loan you the money, but if you can't pay it back, with interest, by the end of the year, I want you to go into the military, and sign up.' And he said, 'OK, I'll do that.'"
Today, Romney said, "He's got shops all over the country and thousands of people that work with him."
This story corrects an earlier version. An aide to Romney said he was referring to business loans when he suggested students borrow money from their parents.
Popular in Politics
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- Obama prom pictures surface 131 Comments
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen. 179 Comments
- GOP Rep.: Obama elected because of Reagan's immigration reforms
- Petraeus biographer regrets affair
- Pelosi ties bridge collapse to sequester
- Is President Obama ending the war on terror? 290 Comments
- Palin Image: Confident, Secure Play Video












Really, Mitt?
The reason kids (and parents) are taking out federal loans is because they don't have the money "lying around".
You take the risk that that higher education will allow you to make a decent salary in a field that you will want to work in for the next 50 years (since retirement is NOT an option any more....)
If people want Romney as a leader, the people should be demanding to hold him accountable, even now.
So what will Romney do differently, given Obama's hypocrisy is based on continuing any number of GOP desires:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3096434/vp/40575006#40575006
http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2011/10/11/how-mitt-romneys-health-care-experts-helped-design-obamacare/
And on the plus side, if this is one, Obama has the "chess defense", though in fairness fewer people are taking that belief at face value.
So what's that you say, about being "very, very, very stupid"? You call Obama a hypocrite, but what will your favored person do differently? With detail please...
we just had the deepest in more than a hundred years. Slow recovery is due to not enough stimulus- and the Republicans fought against any stimulus whatsoever. Trickle-down economics is also a proven failure- rich people like Romney put their money in banks off shore- they hoard their cash they don't put it into "job creation". That is another GOP fairy tale. Romney just told young people to borrow money from their parents to start new businesses. That is fine if your parents have enough money to lend - not possible for today's middle class families struggling to make ends meet. What can we conclude? Romney is a disconnected rich hypocrite who has not a clue about the real economy. Romney is Bush reborn, or worse, since he made his money firing people, sending jobs overseas and shutting down pension plans at government expense.
http://www.realitybase.org/journal/2009/3/10/the-american-dream-died-in-february-1973.html
(about wages/income for middle class people)
Also, if even entry level jobs require a Bachelor's degree and x years' of experience, a degree will do nothing. Especially given loan costs. Romney clearly avoids the issues and prefers gloss. We don't need people like that running this country.
And "austerity" is another word for "downward spiral; race to the bottom".
But people seem to prefer "little words" over "fair descriptions".
fail and ensure USA will at par with Russia soon. The country which does not have money
to educate young men and women, forcing them to borrow, work to repay the student loan
for rest of life will never succeed as a economic power in the coming decades.
Development needs peace of mind and environment. USA population is tense and
society is not at peace. For an elusive name USA is a super power USA allows the
kingdoms of petro land to scam US citizens by high prices of OIL. A small part of is given
as back as orders for armaments and protection money to US military. A society which
does not understand this simple economic theory is already in the level of colonial Africa.
What USA need is a president who things like a normal Human. People of USA should
think of a new candidate outside these two parties. Both apple and Google are founded
by persons who do not carry the regular DNA of past US heroes. there is nothing to show
USA has a no future with the current political setup.
Obama chose to continue some of them, however. And whether or not he was playing chess as means to show people how bad the system is, or if he's ignorant, out of touch, a sellout, a poor pastry chef, or any other excuse is up for debate.
Yes, Romney does seem to stem from the same cloth as Obama. And Bush. And Clinton. And Bush. And Reagan. And Carter (latter-end of his era gave some handouts to companies). And Ford. And Nixon (China). And corporate welfare started long before 1970 to be sure... even television of the 1970s pointed out corporate welfare (e.g. "All in the Family", 1972). Do shows point out corporate welfare now? Maybe in a passing reference by Lisa Simpson once every 25 years as so far she hasn't made any reference that I'm aware of, but people prefer Homer, it seems...
We do understand economic theory - but turning an economy from a symbiotic one to where one side (supply-side) is given handouts and bailouts and at the expense of the demand-side (lower wages that would mean low profits if the supply-side didn't get our money as forced handouts/bailouts)... especially when those getting the corporate welfare have used predatory practices to wipe out competition. If a large entity can lower prices, knowing that the competition will not be able to survive, that is what has happened.
Even giving money to companies that lay off or offshore...
http://www.ctj.org/html/layoffs.htm
In a true free market, ALL OF THESE COMPANIES would fall in the end.
http://www.progress.org/cwfedex.htm
The headline alone speaks volumes...
And no amount of lying would save them...
http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/2/7/184312/5388
http://hubpages.com/hub/HowH1BVisaFRAUDiskillingAmerica
Let's not forget that small businesses have a huge failure rate! It's not exactly a hot career path. But for those few who can ride it out, more power to ya!