Romney and Paul allege 'dirty tricks' by Santorum supporters
Republican presidential candidate former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum speaks as his wife Karen, right, listens during a primary night watch party Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2012, in St. Charles, Mo.
/ AP Photo/Jeff RobersonThe campaigns of Mitt Romney and Ron Paul have filed a complaint alleging "serious and prejudicial misconduct" by supporters of rival Rick Santorum at the March 17 Missouri caucus that they say amounted to "voter suppression."
The complaint, filed with the state Republican party and several caucus officials and dated Monday, demands that the state party refuse to recognize the delegates from Jefferson County, where the campaigns say the improprieties took place.
At that caucus site, the complaint says, Santorum supporters deliberately delayed the proceedings when they realized they were outnumbered by a combination of Romney and Paul supporters. After the Romney and Paul voters left in frustration, the proceedings were allowed to resume, and by that time, Santorum voters had the majority, the complaint says.
Complete coverage: Election 2012Ryan Williams, a Romney spokesman said, "Facing a likely defeat, Senator Santorum's supporters used dirty political tricks to marginalize conservative activists and suppress votes in order to elect their delegates. The serious misconduct committed by Sen. Santorum's cronies is appalling, and should be denounced by every candidate in this race."
The Romney and Paul campaigns are demanding that the delegates selected at the Jefferson County site be barred from participating at congressional and state party conventions in April and June, when the selection of actual delegates bound to specific candidates takes place.
The county selected 72 delegates to take part in the April and May conventions. Of those, Santorum got 65, Romney got seven. Rep. Ron Paul of Texas and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich got no delegates.
Popular in Politics
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- Petraeus biographer regrets affair
- The Ted Cruz conundrum
- As summer approaches, sequestration threatens holiday fun
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen. 197 Comments
- GOP Rep.: Obama elected because of Reagan's immigration reforms
- Obama prom pictures surface 131 Comments
- Is President Obama ending the war on terror? 344 Comments













Rick Santorum and his followers care about two things and two things only: Abortion and homosexuals. And they want to eliminate both of those entirely.
Which also explains why people just reprocess the media slants without full understanding the truth behind it.
Newsflash, to all the supporters of the media slant, they lie. They distort the truth. They are not under any legal authority to tell the whole truth, and they, like many here, would rather just project their opinions and anything that supports that opinion.... half of it coming from Press Releases from the "spin doctors" and same lobbyists that are buying out politicians.
Half a truth is still a lie... half the facts does not equal the whole truth...
Of course, now if they send away all the delegates from this, then Romney loses 7 delegates. Ron Paul is just playing the Devil's Advocate, at this point and has no stake in anything, other than to possibly ruin other's chances. Truth be told, it's down to Romney and Santorum, anyone else is just helping the media with a story.
Fraud is a purposeful disseption, like Obama's "Change", when all that changed was the date.
Had challege to this, and in the article above..
"After the Romney and Paul voters left in frustration". In other words, they got tired of waiting in line and they are blaming others for holding up the line. Not quite the definition of "suppression", unless they have some way of proving that someone laid in the doorway...
The whole story is theatrics... something to rally the sheep, and by the posts here, it worked like a charm.
Let's say Santorum does become President and is able to pass laws against abortion and gay rights. The women who is unable to terminate her pregnancy is forced to either give the child up or raise it. More then likely, if that woman has to keep the child, it will grow up in poverty or the woman would have no choice but to rely on public assistance (if he doesn't ban that too). If the child becomes a ward of the State, then that child would be subjected to many foster homes if that child is not adopted.
Then there is the gay issue. He wants to criminalize people for being gay. ***???
People don't realize that there would be an obscene amount of lives that would be destroyed by Santorum if he were to become President. I just hope that it NEVER happens.
People seem to have President mixed up with Monarch or Dictator, which explains the current state of the country.
As for the abortion issue, there have been 6 out of the last 8 Presidents who were pro-life, yet abortions still proceeded....
As for Gay Marriage, just because the President does or does not support a lifestyle has NEVER reflected the majority of Voters. The fact that the only way they have passed any laws in support has been to circumvent the vote. Which is odd, because the majority vote IS the final word in any laws, based on the Constitution...
So, let's recap. President can't make any laws, he would need a Super Majority to get the House of Representatives and Senate to pass any measures.