Political Hotsheet
By

Scott Conroy /

CBS News/ March 27, 2012, 8:59 AM

Santorum's willingness to fight to the end comes with risks

Rick Santorum

/ AP Photo/Charles Dharapak

This article originally appeared on RealClearPolitics.

Almost no one expected Rick Santorum to get this far.

After all, the former Pennsylvania senator spent the first six months of his bid for the Republican presidential nomination as an under-funded, under-organized, and under-polling sideshow, someone who was discounted privately by his Republican rivals and the media alike.

But with 11 states now in the win column, Santorum has made Mitt Romney scrap for nearly all of his victories and surely has caused more than a few sleepless nights at the front-runner's campaign headquarters in Boston.

Nonetheless, Romney has amassed a substantial lead in the delegate count as April nears, a month that offers several opportunities for him to take a major step toward becoming the nominee. And conservatives who had long been skeptical of him are beginning call more loudly for the party to unite around the former Massachusetts governor.

This dynamic is an unpleasant one for Santorum, not only because of its implications for 2012 but because it raises an important long-term question for him: Is he risking his future in the party by continuing to run an aggressive campaign against the likely nominee?

South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint threatened to open the floodgates against Santorum last week when he heaped praise on Romney and said that his remaining GOP opponents should assess whether they can still win.

"If they can't, the best thing they can probably do is to help the one who is going to win," DeMint said.

On Sunday, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour -- who, like DeMint, has not endorsed Romney -- upped the ante by suggesting that the front-runner would become the nominee "unless he steps on a landmine."

The inevitability argument is one that Santorum argues is hollow, insisting that he can still win the 1,144 delegates required to seal the nomination on the first ballot. "We have just as good a chance of getting to [the delegate threshold] as he does," he told the National Review.

But Santorum is finding fewer prominent Republicans who defend that view.

While many political observers have circled April 24 as the date on which a Santorum loss in his home state would leave him little choice but to step aside, a more immediate day of reckoning could come next Tuesday when Wisconsin, Maryland, and Washington, D.C., hold their primaries.

Santorum has little chance of victory in the latter two contests, and has recently downplayed his chances of winning in Wisconsin; an 0-for-3 showing that day will surely increase the calls for him to step aside, or at the very least to tone down the rhetoric against Romney.

Former Iowa Republican Party Chairman Steve Grubbs, who helmed Herman Cain's campaign in the nation's first voting state, said that Santorum's future in the GOP will be enhanced if he goes into the convention as a vital player but warned that he must be careful to avoid perceptions that he is "hanging on for his own ego."

"I think it's important that it does not appear that he's making it personal," Grubbs said. "At the convention, he has to show a unified front. That's pretty difficult if it draws to a bitter end, so being more positive and issue-oriented will improve his stature."

Neutral Republicans are concerned that Santorum is diminishing Romney's chances of beating President Obama in the fall, a concern that has grown given Santorum's combative posture after winning Saturday's Louisiana primary.

In Wisconsin the next day, Santorum called Romney "the worst Republican in the country to put up against Barack Obama." And during an appearance Monday on the steps of the Supreme Court, he said the Republican front-runner was "uniquely disqualified to make the case" against Obama's health care reform law.

"Sen. Santorum's presence in the race isn't as big of a problem for the party as his tactics," said one officially unaligned Republican strategist. "He has long since stopped consistently offering a positive vision and instead focused on the most childish and counter-productive attacks possible on the likely nominee. I get running hard to the finish line, but people aren't going to forget the manner in which he did it."

Whenever Santorum has been asked about his ambitions beyond 2012, he has insisted that his entire focus is on winning this time around.

But unlike 68-year-old Newt Gingrich, Santorum is expected to remain in the thick of the fray in the coming years. Only 53, the former senator has proven his tenacity as a campaigner and earned a strong following within the conservative movement.

Despite his refusal to acknowledge the steep odds posed by the delegate math, Santorum has become increasingly open about at least one fallback plan.

Asked in an interview Monday with David Brody if he would consider being Romney's running mate, Santorum responded that he would "of course" do so.

The only problem: Romney has publicly downplayed the prospect of tapping Santorum for VP, and the deep Republican bench further underscores the unlikelihood of such a move.

But with more than 250 delegates to his name already and a solid claim to the title of chief Romney alternative in the 2012 primary fight, Santorum still wields plenty of clout.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • Scott Conroy On Twitter »

    Scott Conroy is a National Political Reporter for RealClearPolitics and a contributor for CBS News.

10 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dng888 says:
The LDS Church does believe in God the Father, Jesus Christ his son and the Holy Ghost. The Mormon (which is a nickname) Church's true title is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Mitt Romney should be allowed to follow his faith. We have the 1st amendment and there should be separation between Church and State. The LDS religion supports no political party period. I am sure Thomas Jefferson and James Madison felt the importance of this amendment by having it as our first. They did not want state sponsored religion nor did they want to be beholden to the Church of England. Let's leave all aspersions and false doctrine to be read with the comic books and leave those who wish to choose their religion that right.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cbsnews_viewer says:
"But people aren't going to forget the manner in which he did it.", Scott Conroy quotes an unidentified Republican strategist. This is supposed to be the 'risks'. The Republicans have a machine, just like the Chicago Democratic machine injected Mr Obama into the White House. This story is all about unnamed Republicans rallying around Romney. From the start, Romney has been their Golden Child. Romney is weaker than these establishment Republicans like. Scott Conroy's "prominent Republicans" should be further named. I suspect these are the same prominent Republicans that allowed Mr Obama to violate the War Power Act against Libya. One wonders what payoffs these establishment Republicans are getting and why they don't like to follow the Constitution of the United States.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ajp40503 says:
Santorum said given a choice between Romney and Obama we should just stick with what we have. In other words the country should reelect Obama. Rick Santorum forfeits his standing in the Republican Party for spouting such nonsense. A right wing ideologue with a hard edge like Santorum would lose to Obama in a landslide.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightontarget says:
"Asked in an interview Monday with David Brody if he would consider being Romney's running mate, Santorum responded that he would "of course" do so."
************************************

Yeah, right. I'm sure the Mitster would LOVE to have Ricky as his sidekick. Especially after some of the comments that Rick has made. Oh what the heck, they deserve each other. LOL!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
boatdocster says:
The more Santorum opens his mouth, the more one see's how irrational and desperate he really is. It's no wonder why the citizens of Pennsylvania sent this loser packing.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
IonOtter says:
You don't put your reproductive organs in crazy, and you don't put your votes in crazy, either.

And Santorum is pure, unadulterated, grade-AAA, USDA-approved, all-natural, organic, cage-free crazy.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
retiredgustav says:
Santorum proved that Romney can not win in the southland. Santorum also knows that Romney will not win in November. Santorum knows he will be in the cat-bird-seat come 2016, in which he will be soundly trounced.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bth8446 says:
Two things
1)
Should all racers quit because someone else is in first place in the middle of the race?
2)
believe me, anything Santorum brings up during this period of campaigning is good. If all candidates knocked out of picture, then any issue won't be brough up until Romney is going up directly against President Obama. If its brought up then, and its enough to turn tides against Romney, then Obama wins. If Santorum brings up something that turns tides against Romney, at least we have the Santorum alternative to send to November Election.

Consider this a vetting process, making sure Romney is the one everyone wants BEFORE there are no other alternative candidates to step in
reply
littleoldguy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Or making sure Romney is the one everyone NOT wants AFTER there's no other alternatives?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
WHAT-IS-HE-SMOKING says:
Will someone PLEASE read this to Rick and explain what it means.
reply