Political Hotsheet
By

Lucy Madison /

CBS News/ March 6, 2012, 11:27 PM

Romney takes 6 Super Tuesday states, Santorum nets 3

Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney and his wife Ann attend a Super Tuesday Republican primary elections evening in Boston, Massaschusetts, March 6, 2012.

/ EMMANUEL DUNAND/AFP/Getty Images
Updated: 7:37 a.m. ET

(CBS News) CBS News projects that Mitt Romney will win Ohio's key primary contest Tuesday, after a neck-and-neck race with rival Rick Santorum in the pivotal battleground state. Overall, Romney took six Super Tuesday states, compared to Santorum's three.

With more than 99 percent of precincts reporting in Ohio, Romney has 38 percent support to Santorum's 37 percent. Newt Gingrich is in third place with 15 percent and Ron Paul follows with 9 percent.

Mitt Romney also won primaries in Virginia, Massachusetts and Vermont, as well as the Idaho and Alaska caucuses. Rick Santorum won primaries in Tennessee and Oklahoma, and the North Dakota caucuses. In Georgia, Gingrich clinched his first primary victory since South Carolina's January 21 primary contest.

Ron Paul did not win any contests on Tuesday, but he did finish second in four states: Vermont, Idaho, North Dakota and Virginia.

CBS News estimates show Romney now has a total of 361 delegates, Santorum has 112, Gingrich has 80 and Paul has 24.

Super Tuesday results by state: Alaska | Georgia | Idaho | Massachusetts | North Dakota | Ohio | Oklahoma | Tennessee | Vermont | Virginia

In remarks to reporters following the Ohio call for Romney, his campaign spokesman Ryan Williams said the campaign was "pleased" to have "gained the trust of Ohio voters."

"Nearly a week ago Governor Romney was behind in some polls by double digits. But Ohio voters responded to his pro-jobs and pro-growth message, and rallied behind him [in] the days before the primary and helped push him to victory tonight," Williams said.

Speaking out of Boston before his victory was projected in the Buckeye State, Romney was hopeful that his campaign was "going to get more" wins under its belt by the end of the night, and that by his count, the delegate situation "looks good."

"Tonight, we're -- we're doing some counting. We're counting up the delegates for the convention, and it looks good. And we're counting down the days until November, and that looks even better," Romney told an enthusiastic crowd.

With almost all precincts reporting in Massachusetts, Romney, who served as the state's governor between 2003 and 2007, was ahead overwhelmingly, with 72 percent support.

In his remarks, Romney went on to accuse President Obama of being "unresponsive" to the wishes of the American people, and blasted him for allegedly operating "by command instead of by consensus."

Super Tuesday sets up long slog to GOP nomination
How Romney won Ohio
How Rick Santorum won Tennessee and Oklahoma

"President Obama seems to believe he's unchecked by the Constitution," Romney said. "He's unresponsive to the will of our people. He operates by command instead of by consensus. In a second term, he'd be unrestrained by the demands of re-election. And if there's one thing we cannot afford is four years of Barack Obama with no one to answer to."

A win in Ohio would have been considered a huge boon for either Romney or Santorum on Super Tuesday. For Romney, the victory could signal a return to the so-called inevitability of his candidacy; for Santorum, it would have proven his ability to win in a crucial swing state with a large, diverse population.

Polls showed the two candidates neck-and-neck in the past several weeks, although the most recent surveys trended toward Romney.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Romney and his super PAC outspent Santorum four-to-one in Ohio, spending just over $4 million on TV and radio ads in the state. Santorum and his super PAC spent $968,000.

Speaking to supporters in Ohio, Santorum called Tuesday a "big night" for his campaign -- but emphasized that he was "up against enormous odds."

"This was a big night tonight, lots of states. We're going to win a few, we're going to lose a few, but as it looks right now, we're going to get at least a couple of gold medals and a whole passel full of silver medals," he said. "We went up against enormous odds, not just here in the state of Ohio, where -- who knows how much we were outspent -- but in every state. There wasn't a single state in the list that I just gave you where I spent more money than the people I was able to defeat to win that state. In every case, we overcame the odds."

Complete Republican primary results
CBS News estimated Republican delegate scorecard

According to exit polls, the economy was the top issue for voters in the primary states, while the ability to defeat President Obama is the candidate quality that matters most to voters.

In both Tennessee and Oklahoma, Santorum did well among the approximately 75 percent of primary voters who identified themselves as evangelical Christians, according to exit polls. He did particularly well among those voters who said it mattered "a great deal" to them that the candidate share their religious beliefs.

In Tennessee, with nearly all precincts reporting, Santorum led Romney with 37 percent to 28 percent. In Oklahoma, with all precincts reporting, Santorum bested Romney with 34 percent to 28 percent.

In Georgia, which Gingrich represented in Congress for 20 years, the former House speaker was ahead with 47 percent support with nearly all precincts reporting. Romney came in second with 26 percent. Santorum followed with 20 percent.

Exit polls out of Georgia showed Gingrich winning among men, women, and white evangelical voters. He also led among very conservative voters and those who said the economy was their top issue.

Gingrich's victory in Georgia could give the candidate a much-needed boost in momentum after a string of losses in recent nominating contests.

In remarks in Atlanta after the Georgia polls closed Tuesday night, Gingrich made clear that he plans to stay in the race, despite his recent struggles.

"Remember when it was Tim Pawlenty who was going to crowd me out? And remember then when it was Michele Bachmann? And then it was our good friend, Herman Cain the first time? And then, for a brief moment, it was Donald Trump almost," Gingrich told supporters. "And then it was our good friend, Rick Perry, then it was Herman Cain the second time, and now it's Santorum."

He continued: "You just can't quite get across to them: It's all right. There are lots of bunny rabbits that run through. I am the tortoise. I just take one step at a time."

In Virginia, Romney earned 60 percent to Ron Paul's 40 percent. But both Gingrich and Rick Santorum -- who could have posed a threat for Romney in Virginia -- failed to get on the ballot, leaving voters just two options.

Ron Paul gets boost from crossover voters in Vermont and Virginia
Home state ties key to Gingrich's Georgia victory
Gingrich fights for relevance after Super Tuesday

Romney also won by a significant margin in Vermont, where he was up 40 percent to Paul's 25 percent with most precincts reporting. Romney likely enjoyed an advantage in the state due to its proximity to Massachusetts.

With all precincts reporting in North Dakota, Santorum led with 40 percent to Paul's 28 percent. Romney followed with 24 percent.

In Idaho, with all precincts reporting, Romney won with 62 percent, and Rick Santorum came in second with 18 percent. Paul came in third, also with 18 percent, but just 29 votes behind Santorum.

In the Alaska caucus, with nearly all precincts reporting, Romney holds a 33 percent to 29 percent lead over Santorum, with Paul in third at 24 percent.

All 10 states are awarding their delegates proportionately - allocating them based on the outcome in congressional districts, a candidate's percentage of the statewide vote, or a combination of the two.   

This weekend, there are caucuses in Kansas and the Virgin Islands, and the Wyoming caucuses will end. On Tuesday, Alabama and Mississippi will hold primaries, and Hawaii and American Samoa will hold caucuses.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
67 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
A fight between the sleazebag Robmee and the fake Christian Sanitorium. I love it.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RonPaulLibertyForAll says:
I am not a supporter of Obama, but he will beat Romney. Republicans are just not very thrilled with Romney. Most people I know will not wont vote for him. I personally see little difference between Obama and Romney so I will not vote for either one. I refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils.
reply
noloyalisti replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
There is a HUGE difference between the slimy, lying job killing Robmee and the job creating, intelligent Nobel Peace Prize winning Obama.

All we have to do is get rid of the influence of the giant corporations and the evil, greedy, top 1% who run America (into the ground). Then we can get some good stuff done.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hlmelsaid says:
Near end line.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hopetrumps says:
Mitt says it'll take an "act of God" to deny him the nomination. Well since money and power seems to be what's controlling the Republican party these days (and not the Lord Almighty!) we can bet that ole Romney has the Republican nomination in the bag----but Obama will cream him in the general
reply
littleoldguy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Does Romney bet $10,000 on this?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ReckonedTruth says:
by arthanyel March 7, 2012 11:34 AM EST
Obama (contrary to conservative rhetoric) is not a left wing extremist - he is a rational pragmatist. I actually like that. That said, Obama has not used his most effective skill (public speaking) well at all, and his administration is much more insular and opaque than he promised. He is a good politician, and plays the partisan game well, but he is not the visionary leader we thought we were electing.

Obama has done a solid job, even a good one under the circumstances of Republican stonewalling and a disastrous economy handed to him by those same Republicans. And I will vote for him again. But what I want in an IDEAL president is someone that will be a visionary leader ready, willing and able to lead the re-engineering of the US Government for the modern era, and able to enroll the majority of the nation into that better vision, and Obama just isn't that man.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

@arthanyel...

I share your sentiments with regard to PRESIDENT Obama .. you're on point... and I'm starting to believe most independent american voters echo as you stated with regard to PRESIDENT Obama. I for one-- do also see the president as a rational pragmalist and not a flaming liberal as depicted by his opposition..what the oppositon has done is inflammatory at their lack luster points against the President.

..the one FACT is certain.. this president has extended a bi-partisan approach to congress..I have NOT liked how the "House of Rep" have conducted their operations as a " MEAN SPIRITED House of REP".. not even considering in a spirit to be sincere to work honestly with the PRESIDENT(as we have seen)..which speaks VOLUMES of their OUR interest and contempt for and to INTENTIONALLY disrespect the President with GLEE..

BUT we can't forget the democrats HAD THE HOUSE OF REP- and could have moved thru more legislation than they did before mid terms elections.. before the TEA PARTY politicians took the HOUSE from the demcracts.. so the demcrats are at fault as well on so many fronts..

..its time for the american voter to be adamant..and if after one term as an elected politician..the voters should NOT re-elect the politician based upon promises not fulfilled on behalf of "WE THE PEOPLE".. and put term limits on Senators..

So I view this cngress (mainly house of Rep)...not interested in "WE THE PEOPLE".. and so be it upon their MEAN SPIRITED attitude and sometimes RACE BASED demonstration presented as such ..

The polls results this November may be a BIG surprized to the GOP.. and you know who is going to be the lead voters to changed this infectious disease that surfaced last mid- term elections?..The american women's voter block across america ..who will hand the re-election bid to President Obama as a simple FACT alone...because of what the GOP are insidiously stating and taking RIGHTS away from american women and their rights as women over their own womb..

..I didn't vote for Senator Obama for president..but I'm coming closer to the realization of voting this time in favor of President Obama for re-election as an independent voter..
reply
arthanyel replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Thanks, and I agree. This is the Hobson's Choice we face - that neither side is a "great" choice, but we still have to make the best choice we can.

As for the race to move the country forward, I have decided I would rather ride a lame horse (the Democrats) than a dead one (the Republicans). But I would much rather see some healthy horses available and break the deadlock between the two parties, which are both goverened by their respective extremists. We don't have much time to make an impact on the 2012 election, but we MUST work to change the game for the 2014 and 2016 elections if we want anything to improve.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
arthanyel says:
I believe that what we are seeing is the logical conclusion of having media constantly narrowing it's focus to gain an audience share, no matter how bizarre the audience, and the disaster of campaign finance. It becomes a vicious cycle - politicians become ever more partisan to raise money (because moderate independents don't donate) and media becomes ever more partisan to gain audience.

Conservatives are living in a bubble - or more precisely, an echo chamber, where their own delusions are heterodyning. And the more the lunatic fringe hears its own insanity repeated back at increased volume and with better graphics, the more insane they will become.

And moderate independents and fiscal conservative, socially liberal Americans (who together make up the MAJORITY of Americans) have nowhere to turn. We will vote for Obama because the Republicans are far worse choices, not because Obama represents our ideal president.
reply
arthanyel replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Obama (contrary to conservative rhetoric) is not a left wing extremist - he is a rational pragmatist. I actually like that. That said, Obama has not used his most effective skill (public speaking) well at all, and his administration is much more insular and opaque than he promised. He is a good politician, and plays the partisan game well, but he is not the visionary leader we thought we were electing.

Obama has done a solid job, even a good one under the circumstances of Republican stonewalling and a disastrous economy handed to him by those same Republicans. And I will vote for him again. But what I want in an IDEAL president is someone that will be a visionary leader ready, willing and able to lead the re-engineering of the US Government for the modern era, and able to enroll the majority of the nation into that better vision, and Obama just isn't that man.
Zann-Zel replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
People who run for President are human. You aren't going to find a perfect one. But I think Obama's pretty danged close! : )
linkicon reporticon emailicon
daffy64 says:
If Romney does get the nomination, there's going to be a lot of flustered teabaggers either not showing up to vote or writing "Ron Paul" or "Non of the above" on their ballots.

This is going to get really ugly.
reply
will_tyndale replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I am not sure if you have noticed yet, but Ron Paul is not going to win the Republican nomination, nor the White House. Romney is our best shot at winning both, and with that, a lot of Republican congressmen win as well. And the economy? Oh my word. Who can help the economy more than a man who understand finance.

Whether you think Romney understands what it's like to earn $7/hr or not, he understands how to get the economy rolling so your $7 buys more. That is important.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mari1963 says:
Romney's wife and Santorum's wife are both ugly and creepy. I don't want either one as first lady. Ewwww ! Go Obama !
reply
Zann-Zel replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Republican wives always remind me of the "Stepford Wives"! Scary!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
esq777 says:
Poor Willard "mitt" Romney. All the money and organization and Willard still can't win decisively. Guess Willard needs to spend some more. Tap into his offshore loot or sell some of his Cadillacs. Or maybe bust up another American company, raid the pension fund, and use that for some more advertising.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
occupy_cbs says:
AnewPerspective: "4-more years of obama and the United States will be under communist regime"



Hey "insane_perspective" -- your ability to parrot the same fox/rush republican talking points and propaganda only proves you have lost the 2012 battle, but hey, keep spewing those frank luntz "buzz" words to incite the far-right extremists like yourself.
reply
daffy64 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
by occupy_cbs March 7, 2012 9:51 AM EST
AnewPerspective: "4-more years of obama and the United States will be under communist regime"

-

Oh. Come. On.
See all 67 Comments