Political Hotsheet
By

Rebecca Kaplan /

CBS News/ February 27, 2012, 11:22 PM

Santorum robocall seeks votes from Democrats

Rick Santorum

Republican presidential candidate, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum speaks during a campaign rally, Sunday, Feb. 26, 2012, in Traverse City, Mich.

/ AP Photo

As the GOP primary race comes down to the wire in Michigan, Rick Santorum's campaign has a last trick up its sleeve.

The campaign has launched telephone robocalls throughout the state slamming rival Mitt Romney for opposing the auto industry bailout in late 2008 and early 2009, and urging Democrats to show up for Tuesday's Republican primary and cast ballots for Santorum.

"Michigan Democrats can vote in the Republican primary on Tuesday. Why is it so important?" the voice on the call says. "Romney supported the bailouts for his Wall Street, billionaire buddies, but opposed the auto bailouts. That was a slap in the face to every Michigan worker, and we're not going to let Romney get away with it."

Special Section: Campaign 2012

The call urges listeners to "send a loud message" to Romney by voting for Santorum, even though Santorum, too, opposed the auto industry bailout. It ends with the line: "This call is supported by hard-working Democratic men and women and paid for by Rick Santorum for president."

Ryan Williams, a Romney spokesman, issued a statement late on Monday that said: "It is outrageous that Rick Santorum is inviting Democrats into the Republican primary to vote against Mitt Romney. Rick Santorum has moved beyond just 'taking one for the team.' He is now willing to wear the other team's jersey if he thinks it will get him more votes. We believe that Republicans will decide who wins Michigan, and we are confident that will be Mitt Romney."

A Santorum spokesman defended the attempt to turn out Reagan Democrats for Santorum, despite the fact that Santorum's position on the bailout was the same as Romney's.

"Any conservative message that reaches out, when it's about creating jobs for all Americans is going to be attractive to Reagan Democrats," Santorum spokesman Hogan Gidley said in an interview, explaining the rationale for the robocalls. "We're going to need those Reagan Democrats to win this election."

Asked about the contradiction in Santorum's robocalls criticizing a position Santorum himself took, Gidley said the content of the robocalls is justified because Romney supported the financial industry bailout while opposing the auto bailout, while Santorum opposed both, suggesting the issue is consistency.

"Governor Romney opposed the auto bailout for the workers of Detroit, but was fine pushing the bailout for his friends on Wall Street," Gidley said. "Either be all for the bailout or all against the bailout, but don't pick winners and losers."

However, the robocalls do not mention Santorum's opposition to the auto bailout, or the consistency issue, and in fact leave listeners with the impression that Santorum supported the auto bailout.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
34 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jimzien says:
If I were a Michigan Democrat I hold my nose and heed the call -- but only if it came directly from G*d. Come to think of it, it just might have, in as much as He seems to be solidly in Rick's retinue, having received promises of part time employment in a Santorum administration.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ProgressNow says:
I'll be voting for Ron Paul (only other choice) in the Mar 6 Virginia GOP primary. Doing my small part as a life-long Dem to F-over the GOP any way I can... XOXOXOOXOXXOXOXOXXOOXOOXXOXOXOXOXOXO
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jswiss1 says:
Over the last few weeks, I've found Romney to be be: 1) Very Rich.. and 2)Brutally honest. With Santorum: 1) Very "evangelical".. 2) Underhanded... and 3) Desperate. I'm a an Independant, and it frightens me to see to see the types of canididates you guys have offer as of late. First Palin. Now this. You guys have alot of work to do.
reply
nycnikato replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I've found Romney to be extremely dishonest and calculating. I have also found him extremely evasive on social issues and religious issues. think I saw his picture ini the dictionary when looking up "Flip-Flopper".
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ShashNahalin says:
Santorum has become Arelen Spector
reply
nycnikato replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
As a young Democrat growing up, I liked Arlen Specter A lot. Rational people find very little wrong with Specter. He worked hard, with a steady , fair hand to craft laws to better the country.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nycnikato says:
There are no dirty tricks here. A president has to be able to get support from both parties. I think Santorum can do that. I am a lifelong Democrat,converted to republicanism by Herman Cain. I don't agree with all of Santorum's policies, but I do agree with his moral stance. It would turn my stomach to have Romney as the nominee. I need someone I would feel comfortable calling "President" If Obama wins, I am comfortable. If Santorum wins I am Comfortable. Democrats need to get out and vote. It was very wise for Santorum to do this.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jswiss1 says:
Wow!! I can't believe the GOP is letting Santorum (expose) their party like this. I think we all knew they we're rather "shiesty" (as most politicians are) but this take things to an unseen level. With the election of Obama, and the then possibility of a woman (Palin) being in office, more people than ever are paying attention to what is (really) going on in politics.... and the media makes these things (way) more accessible than ever. Wow. These guys have alot of work to do. I don't think they stand much of a chance during this election, but for '16, they have a huge mountain to climb over in order to be competitive and trustworthy.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jdaryyl says:
This is manufactured drama

DeLeGaTeS

If you think Rick Santorum won Iowa, Minnesota, and Colorado, you're wrong.

Let me explain: Santorum did win the caucus votes in all those states. But because none of those states have bound delegates, that means the state's delegates to the national convention could theoretically vote for someone besides Santorum for the nomination, someone like say, Ron Paul, whose campaign is aggressively working to control as many state delegates as possible. In Minnesota, where Paul nabbed 27 percent of the caucus vote, the Paul campaign estimates that 75 percent of the current delegates are Paul supporters. In Colorado, where Paul got 12 percent of the vote, 50 percent of the delegates are Paul supporters. Now delegates face elimination rounds, so it's unclear if the Paul campaign will be successful or not in maintaining these percentages. But the campaign is hoping to pull it off. From my piece today:

The campaign refuses to worry about backlash from the party if its plan succeeds, and Paul's percentage of delegates at the convention is significantly higher than his percentage of votes.

"We think that's the way a party should really pick its nominee," [Paul national campaign chairman Jesse] Benton says. "We think that the activists that are most tuned in to the issues, most engaged in the process should be the ones selecting the nominee."

It's true that most states have bound delegates (or at least the vast majority of delegates are bound), so this strategy has limits. But if there is a brokered convention — which is not out of the realm of possibility this cycle — it will matter if most or a significant chunk of delegates are Paul supporters...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
grumpas says:
I have never seen such pathetic candidates!!! A religious lunatic and a plastic corporate raider trying to become President of the US!!! It's a toss up which is the worst!
reply
RobAla replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
At least none of them have the "religious" poor judgment to sit in a racist and radical church under Rev. Wright for 20 years; and at least some of them understand how businesses work. At least these people are not President Obama.
thechooch1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RobAla ok now roba which is it? "sit in a racist and radical (Christian) church under Rev. Wright for 20 years" or is he a radical Muslim? You can't have it both ways.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RobAla says:
I am liking Santorum less and less. It is wrong for him to ask Democrats (who will be voting for President Obama in November) to vote in the Republican primary. If any Democrat or independent (I am a conservative independent) wants to support a Republican in November, then fine. Otherswise, it is wrong for Santorum to ask Democrats to skew the primary outcome. Democrats a free to vote, but it is wrong for Santorum to encourage it just to stop Romney.
reply
thechooch1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RobAla I got a good laugh out of you saying you are a "conservative independent", your posts are about as far right as they come.
AOCGUY replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thechooch1 - I rarely agree with Rob but being conservative doesn't make one a republican any more than being liberal makes one a democrat.
See all 5 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dman6015 says:
Ahhhaaaa...haaaaa.....haaaaa...ha. The Master Plan is working! VOTE FOR 'SLICK' RICK SANTORUM. Let's get the GOP to put up their worst candidate EVER. A true nut case if there ever was one. GO 'SLICK' RICK! GO 'SLICK' RICK!!
reply
See all 34 Comments