Does Obama elevate Earth above man?
Republican presidential candidate, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, takes questions from reporters after speaking at a rally, Tuesday, Feb. 14, 2012, in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
/ Ted S. Warren/AP(Commentary) Rick Santorum spent Sunday morning on "Face the Nation" explaining his statement uttered during a campaign stop in Ohio Saturday that President Obama espouses a phony ideal and a theology that is not based on the Bible.
Santorum said that his remarks about Obama's phony theology not based on the Bible referred to the president's environmental policies, not his religious faith. He argued that the Obama administration's environmental policies promote the ideas of "radical environmentalists," who he said elevate the Earth above man.
"This idea that man is here to serve the Earth as opposed to husband its resources and be good stewards of the Earth--I think that is a phony ideal. I don't believe that that's what we're here to do. That man is here to use the resources and use them wisely, to care for the Earth, to be a steward of the Earth. But we're not here to serve the Earth. The Earth is not the objective. Man is the objective. And, I think a lot of radical environmentalists have it upside down," Santorum told "Face the Nation" host Bob Schieffer.
From its first day in office, the Obama administration has had a kind of energy ideal, focusing on clean energy and energy independence, as well as the health of the planet. To say that Mr. Obama's environmental policies elevate the Earth above the needs of mankind and the health of the U.S. economy is, of course, more politically-induced rhetoric than reality.
In his 2012 State of the Union address, Mr. Obama said:
"... nowhere is the promise of innovation greater than in American-made energy. Over the last three years, we've opened millions of new acres for oil and gas exploration, and tonight, I'm directing my administration to open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources. Right now -- right now -- American oil production is the highest that it's been in eight years. That's right -- eight years. Not only that -- last year, we relied less on foreign oil than in any of the past 16 years.
"But with only 2 percent of the world's oil reserves, oil isn't enough. This country needs an all-out, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy. A strategy that's cleaner, cheaper, and full of new jobs.
"We have a supply of natural gas that can last America nearly 100 years. (Applause.) And my administration will take every possible action to safely develop this energy. Experts believe this will support more than 600,000 jobs by the end of the decade. And I'm requiring all companies that drill for gas on public lands to disclose the chemicals they use. Because America will develop this resource without putting the health and safety of our citizens at risk."
The Obama administration also wants to get rid of tax breaks for oil companies, which is radical to the oil companies. In the fiscal 2013 budget proposal, Mr. Obama asked to roll back oil and gas tax preferences, which are worth about $40 billion over a decade.
Santorum clarifies prenatal testing, theology statements
Popular in Politics
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- The Ted Cruz conundrum
- Petraeus biographer regrets affair
- Senators lack votes on immigration despite progress
- As summer approaches, sequestration threatens holiday fun
- Senator: Oklahoma "hit hard, but we're not knocked out"
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen. 204 Comments
- GOP Rep.: Obama elected because of Reagan's immigration reforms













As an independent I am deeply concerned about the GOP's position on women's right to access contraception -- this not the same as being anti-abortion but a step further, farther, and frankly off the cliff. The GOP, christians in general don't have a problem with Viagra or other male sexual meds -- is it me or is this just hypocrisy...And what is with the House hearings on this "contraception issue" without having women testifying?
Santorum, and the ultra-conservatives are hell bent on reviving the culture wars -- which I and many other independents could care less about. And even if Romney gets the nomination he will be hellbound to campaign on the ultra-conservative platform -- forget about fixing the economy, truly reducing the deficit (spending cuts alone will not do it), or bringing our troops home from Afghanistan or resolving the "war on terror," or the enviroment or health care -- they - the GOP - simply want to force everyone to live according to their world view.
I for one am tired of these so-called culture warriors, like Santorum and long for leadership that values comprimise and service to the nation as a whole and not the party!
The fact is that this is the most flawed set of candidates in my memory to run for the GOP nod and I can't see how any one of them could beat a sitting President, especially since the nomination process has given the oppositions so much ammunition to use starting in September. How much easier can it get than to campaign against a candidate whose own party members and leaders have thrown so much dirt and critisim.
I guess you don't believe that humans deserve to breathe God's clean air or drink His clean water?
I guess you think we should be thankful that you followers of false prophets allow us to drink water that causes cancer, polluted from your factories, so you can earn your 40 pieces of silver.
I guess you think it's your God given right to commit the sin of greed and gluttony and condemn the entire planet to degradation in the process.