Foster Friess: In my day, women "used Bayer aspirin for contraceptives"
Updated 8:05 p.m. ET
Foster Friess, a prominent backer of Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum, raised eyebrows Thursday when he offered up his own idea for a possible contraceptive method: "This contraceptive thing, my gosh, it's so... inexpensive. Back in my days, they used Bayer aspirin for contraceptives."
Friess's implication is that if women hold aspirin between their legs, they won't open them.
"The gals put it between their knees, and it wasn't that costly," he told MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell.
Mitchell was visibly taken aback by the suggestion.
"Excuse me, I'm just trying to catch my breath from that, Mr. Friess, frankly," she said, after a pause.
Following the remark, the president of the National Organization of Women, Terry O'Neill, said Santorum and Friess should both "apologize."
In an interview with Talking Points Memo, O'Neill said Friess' comments were "deeply offensive" and that "[Santorum] should clearly apologize to the women of this country." She added that "Mr. Friess should apologize" as well.
Friess was a major contributor to Santorum's campaign in the days before his victories in the early nominating states made him a serious contender for the nomination. According to Federal Election Commission filings, Friess gave the Red, White and Blue Fund, a pro-Santorum super PAC, $331,000 in 2011. It's not yet publicly known how much Friess has contributed to the super PAC in 2012 so far.
Santorum has said in the past that he is "not a believer in birth control" and believes it is "harmful" to both women and society. And in October, Santorum discussed the "dangers" of contraception with an evangelical blog.
"Many in the Christian faith have said, 'Well, that's okay. Contraception's okay," he said. "It's not okay because it's a license to do things in the sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be. They're supposed to be within marriage, they are supposed to be for purposes that are, yes, conjugal, but also [inaudible], but also procreative. That's the perfect way that a sexual union should happen."
In a Tweet following the interview, Mitchell continued to express her disbelief over Friess' comment.
"Im still trying to get my head around this," she wrote on Twitter. "Tweeps what should i have said?"
Leigh Ann Caldwell contributed to this report.
Popular in Politics
- Obama and Berlin: Faded echoes meet new realities
- Senators: U.S. must take "more decisive" military action in Syria
- House Republicans pass 20-week limit on abortions 266 Comments
- Smooth, on-time Obamacare rollout no sure thing: GAO
- Immigration reform would cut deficit, analysis shows
- Obama renews push for a nuclear disarmament legacy
- GOP Sen. Murkowski backs same-sex marriage
- Bill Ayers: Obama should be tried for war crimes















A bump in the birth rate for sure, but these new children would be born underweight or with other physical or mental deficits due to the lack of prenatal care and proper nutrition, or even vitamins. Of course, these children will not be able to get into the educational system that would be totally private pay under a Republican administration. And, of course, since there would be no social security or any programs to aid the poor, we will soon have poor, uneducated children, some of which may also have the burden of physical or mental deficits.
Doesn't ANYONE see the dangers of this at all? Or is it that people have finally reverted back to the animal (a phrase used in an earlier post) and just doesn't care about anyone but themselves anymore. A group of hyenas will fight over food and don't care that the smallest or weakest gets a share of the carcass. So this is what we have become? Somehow I don't think that Jesus would approve. But, oh yes, Jesus only loves "certain" people according to some clergy.
I'm so sorry to see that humanity has turned to this. As an older American I can only hope to meet my Maker soon and not be forced to witness the destruction of all REAL Christianity in this country.
1. Write coherent headlines (it's not the legs which are shut by holding an Asprin between the knees!); and
2. Grow up. First, as the author of the quote points out, this bon mot has been around forever. Second, it makes the perfectly valid point that tightly pressed-together knees do pretty much eliminate the need for another form of contraception.
None of which, BTW, has anything to do with the Admministration's dictatorial attempt to override personal conviction.
You may not take offence to his statement but your statement is also offensive. <strong>Your childern</strong> may be fat and lazy, but mine certainly aren't.
I'll bet you a dollar the YOU are fat and lazy compared to me.
BUT WOMEN DON'T GET PREGNANT ALONE!
MEN ARE THE ONES WHO MAKE THEM PREGNANT!
MR FREISS IS A MAN WHO SHOULD KEEP HIS MOUTH SHUT!
"The vatican has finally approved a new contraception method. It is a aspirin held firmly between the knees."
The political silly season is in full force.