Political Hotsheet
By

Lucy Madison /

CBS News/ February 7, 2012, 9:15 AM

Romney: Komen shouldn't fund Planned Parenthood

Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney talks during a campaign rally in Grand Junction, Colorado, February 6, 2012.

/ EMMANUEL DUNAND/AFP/Getty Images

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on Monday added his voice to the chorus of conservatives who say the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation, one of the nation's leading breast cancer charities, should not fund the women's health organization Planned Parenthood.

When asked by talk radio host Scott Hennen in an interview whether he thinks Komen should provide funds to Planned Parenthood, Romney said "I don't think so."

The candidate, who has in recent days taken a much more aggressive stance on issues like contraception, went on to call for the government, as well as Komen, to pull its funding from Planned Parenthood.

"I also feel that the government should cut off funding to Planned Parenthood," Romney told Hennen. "Look, the idea that we're subsidizing an institution that provides abortion, in my view, is wrong. Planned Parenthood oughta stand on its own feet and should not get government subsidy."

Planned Parenthood has in the last several years become a frequent target of congressional Republicans because it provides abortion services in addition to other women's health services while receiving government support. (The government support cannot be used to pay for abortions.)

Romney went on to tout his pro-life credentials: "I am a pro-life individual, I was a pro-life governor, I served as a pro-life governor, I'm a pro-life candidate," he said. "I simply do not want to participate in anything that takes the lives of an unborn child."

The remarks represent an ongoing debate over the breast cancer charity's short-lived decision, announced last week, to withdraw funding from Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screenings and preventative education. The charity had previously provided the women's health organization between around $500,000 and $700,000 worth of grants annually for those services, according to Planned Parenthood.

The decision, when announced, inspired a ferocious backlash from the left and women's health advocates, who accused Komen of caving to pressure from the right in what they cast as an ongoing assault on the reproductive rights of women.

Komen later reversed course, but the controversy has yet to abate completely. Some on the right have accused Planned Parenthood of using bullying and "intimidation" tactics in its efforts to publicize and protest the issue; many on the left, meanwhile, are dissatisfied with the change in Komen language, which leaves ambiguity as to whether or not Planned Parenthood will actually continue to receive grants from the cancer charity in the future.

Romney, meanwhile, is loudly touting his social conservative credentials ahead of three non-binding nominating contests Tuesday night - particularly with Rick Santorum showing signs of life among the socially conservative Republican demographics of Minnesota and Missouri.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
78 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BigJohn555 says:
Any charity that receives a gift from me and re-gifts it to a different charity will never see another gift from me.
If I had wanted my money to go to the second charity, I would have sent it to them.
I intend for my money to be spent directly on the causes advertized, with less than 20% deducted for fundraising and administrative expenses.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ChipTex says:
Cure breast cancer and put Komen out of business.

Vote for Anybody but Mitt and put The Mor(m)on out of business
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nearl451 says:
What is wrong with funding breast cancer screening - no matter what entity does it?

Nothing. Romney's position is pregnant with political connotation, but nothing else. Komen is not funding abortions.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ladyang says:
It's official ladies, Romney has declared war on women and our rights to our bodies! Votes for your bodies and those of your daughters!
reply
mjb89 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
He probably should have learned from Komen's mistake. There is nothing like a female backlash.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
royalstar05 says:
At this rate, Romney doesnt have a chance of winning.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
livingtxlife says:
They fund CONTRACEPTIVES so people don't have to get abortions!! The abortions (legal in case you forgot) are for people who didn't get to PLANNED PARENTHOOD in time to PLAN their PARENTHOOD.

(Think the caps help people who forget the main purpose of Planned Parenthood?)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Le1938 says:
I am a catholic and a pro life, but the contraception is better than abortion and I don't trust Mr FLIP FLOPPER
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
1988JAck says:
Tthis tells you exactly why one should never give to Komen again -- it is a right wing front that spends way to much on buildings and salaries, and then tries to tell everyone how to live.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
andrewjsacks says:
Reactionary. Right, just turn back the clock and take away rights and options for women. What else do you expect from a Republican?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
addict42 says:
If Romney thought it would get him votes, he would be all for abolishing all birth control including condoms, shipping all the homeless and poor off to internment camps and work houses, and vowing to making sure the wealthiest one percenters were given even more privildge and riches by eliminating all taxes on their ill-begotten gains.
reply
See all 78 Comments